Team:Kyoto/Humanpractice/Data

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Data)
 
(163 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
=Data=
+
{{Template:Kyoto/header}}
 +
<div id="kyoto-main">
 +
<div class="texts">
 +
<div id="ankeito">
 +
===Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?===
 +
<br>
 +
[Yes / No]<br><br><br>
 +
<p style="font-size:10px">
 +
[[File:Q1 generation.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig1.A(10~19 N=92 20~29 N=68 30~39 N=26 40~59 N=32 60~=33)<br>
 +
Comparison by generation.<br>
 +
The number of 20s to 50s people who chose yes is larger than that of other generation.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
-
アンケートは選択肢形式にし、質問の初めに性別、出身国、年齢、宗教、職業を応えてもらい、それぞれの要素が回答にどのように影響してくるのかを調べた。また、外国人へのアンケートは、現地で実際に取ったほか、京都に来ている観光客からも集めた。(どこでやったか書く)
+
[[ File:Q1 male vs female.jpg]]<br>
-
アンケートは以下のものを使用した。<br><br>
+
Fig2.(male=111 female=141)<br>
-
'''Questionnaire!!!!'''<br>
+
A comparison between male and female.<br>
-
Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?<br>
+
There does not seem to be much difference.<br>
-
1 Yes
+
<br><br><br>
-
2 No<br>
+
 
-
+
 
-
Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible?  Please give X as many as you think it is permissible. <br>
+
[[File:Q1 Religion.jpg]]<br>
-
1 check
+
Fig3.(Believe particular religion N=126 Not believe particular religion N=126)<br>
-
2 no check<br>
+
A comparison between people who have specific religion and people who do not.<br>
-
Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease. <br>
+
There does not seem to be much difference.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
===Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible?  Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.===
 +
<br>  
 +
[Check / No Check]<br><br>
 +
Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br>  
Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br>
Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br>
Q2.3 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can save people in disease.<br>
Q2.3 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can save people in disease.<br>
Line 22: Line 41:
Q2.10 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.<br>
Q2.10 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.<br>
Q2.11 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can advance science.<br>
Q2.11 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can advance science.<br>
-
Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.<br>
+
Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.<br><br>
-
+
 
-
+
 
-
Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?<br>
+
 
-
1 I know well.
+
[[File:Q2 Religionist vs Irreligionist.jpg]]<br>
-
2 I know only its name.
+
<p style="font-size:10px">Fig4.(Believe particular religion N=126 Not believe particular religion N=126)<br>
-
3 I do not know at all.<br>
+
A comparison between people who have specific religion and people who do not.<br>
-
Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?<br>
+
People who do not have specific religion permit using living things for experiments than people who have specific religion.
-
1 Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene.
+
<br>
-
2 Partly yes, some can be but others are not.
+
 
-
3 No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.<br>
+
 
-
+
 
-
+
[[File:Q2 generetion.jpg]]<br>
-
Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible. <br>
+
Fig5.(10~19 N=92 20~29 N=68 30~49 N=45 50~ N=46)<br>
-
1 check
+
A comparison by generation.<br>
-
2 no check<br>
+
20s permit using living things for experiments than other generation.<br>
-
Q5.1 Bacteria  Q5.2 wheat Q5.3 honeybee Q5.4 killifish  Q5.5 frog
+
 
-
Q5.6 chickens  Q5.7 mouse Q5.8 dog Q5.9 monkey Q5.10 human beings<br><br>
+
<br><br><br>
 +
 
 +
[[File:Q2 male vs female.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig6.(male N=111 female N=141)<br>
 +
A comparison between male and female.<br>
 +
Male permit using living things for experiments than female.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
 +
[[File:Q2 yes vs no(Q1).jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig7.(Q1 yes N=135 Q1 no N=117)
 +
A comparison between people who answered YES at Q1 and who answered NO.<br>
 +
There doesn't seem to be any difference.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
===Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?===
 +
<br>
 +
[ I know well./
 +
I know only its name./
 +
I do not know at all.]<br><br><br>
 +
 
 +
[[File:Q3 male vs female.jpg]]<br>
 +
<p style="font-size:10px">Fig8.(male N=173 female N=210)<br>
 +
A comparison between male and female<br>
 +
The propotion of males who answered "I kwow" about genetically modification (GM) is higher than that of females.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
===Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?===
 +
<br>
 +
[Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene./
 +
Partly yes, some can be but others are not./
 +
No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.]<br><br><br>
 +
 
 +
[[File:Q4 male vs female.jpg]]<br>
 +
<p style="font-size:10px">Fig9.(male N=204 female N=227)<br>
 +
[[File:Q4 religion(chi-square).jpg|530px|320px]][[File:Q4 religion.jpg|550px|340px]]<br>
 +
Fig10.(Belive particular religion N=242 Not believe particular religion N=189)<br>
 +
[[File:Q4 religion.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig11.(Yes N=72 Partly yes N=217 no N=142)<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
===Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.===
 +
<br>
 +
[Check/
 +
No Check]<br>
 +
Q5.1 Bacteria  Q5.2 Wheat Q5.3 Honeybee Q5.4 Killifish  Q5.5 Frog<br>
 +
Q5.6 Chickens  Q5.7 Mouse Q5.8 Dog Q5.9 Monkey Q5.10 Human beings<br><br><br>
 +
 
 +
<p style="font-size:10px">
 +
[[File:Q5 religion(chi-square).jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig12.(Chiristian N=71 Buddist N=105 Irreligionist N=189)<br>
 +
The graph shows the difference according to religion.<br>
 +
The graph of Buddhist is almost the same with that of Irreligionist, which shows that the higher the animals are, the less people who thinks their genes can be modified.
 +
From honey bee to human beings,Christian who thinks genetically modification is permitted takes up about 15%.<br>
 +
 +
[[File:Q5 Asia vs Europe.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig13.(Asia N=332 Europe N=82)<br>
 +
A comparison between Asian and Europe.<br>
 +
The graph is similar with the one which compares between religions. The graph of Asian is similar to that of Buddhist and Irreligionist, while the graph of Europe is similar to that of Christian.<br>
 +
 
 +
[[File:Q5 Asia male vs female.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig14.(male N=150 female N=166)<br>
 +
A comparison between male and female in Asia.<br>
 +
This graph shows the difference between male and female from Asia.
 +
The number of males who allow genetically modification is larger than that of females.<br>
 +
 
 +
[[File:Europe male vs female.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig15.(male N=30 female N=44)<br>
 +
A comparison between male and female in Europe.<br>
 +
The number of males who answered that genetically modification is admitted in E. coli and mice is larger than that of females. About other living things, there is no difference between male and female.<br>
 +
 
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
 
 +
===Result===
 +
<br>
 +
Q1.When we see fig2 and fig3 there doesn't seem any difference.
 +
When we see fig1 the number of 20s to 50s people who chose yes is larger than that of other generation.
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
Q2.The standard of the answer to this question is whether the answer places an importance on the profit they may gain through animal experiments, or the agony the animals feel through these experiments.
 +
 
 +
We asked whether animal experiments can be allowed from three points, “saving human beings”, “useful to our life”, “contribution to the development of science”
 +
 
 +
As a result, people who answered that animal experiment can be performed if it is for saving human beings was obviously larger than the other two points.
 +
 
 +
As for the difference by sex, male seems to be more generous to animal experiment, and place an importance on the profit of the human beings while female seem to place an importance on the animals’ pain. 
 +
 
 +
When we compared by a religion or generation, there seemed to be no significant difference.
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
Q5.Significant difference is observed by different sex, region and religion.
 +
 
 +
In terms of sex, males tend to permit genetically modification than females.
 +
 
 +
In terms of region, half of people in Asia answered that they admit using living things such as E. coli and wheat for experiments. About 35% of them permit using mice and 20% permit using dogs and monkeys. On the other hand, many people in Europe admit using E. coli and wheat. However, no more than 15% of them permit using other living things.
 +
 
 +
In terms of religion, about 50% of Buddhist and Irreligionist answerer permit using E. coli and wheat. The more complicate structures of subjects are, the less people admit. Christian answerer admit rate using E. coli and wheat is also higher than other alternatives rate, which is about 15%.
 +
 
 +
 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
{{Kyoto/import|pagename={{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Template:Kyoto/footer}}
{{Template:Kyoto/footer}}

Latest revision as of 03:55, 28 September 2013

count down

Contents

Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?


[Yes / No]


Q1 generation.jpg
Fig1.A(10~19 N=92 20~29 N=68 30~39 N=26 40~59 N=32 60~=33)
Comparison by generation.
The number of 20s to 50s people who chose yes is larger than that of other generation.



Q1 male vs female.jpg
Fig2.(male=111 female=141)
A comparison between male and female.
There does not seem to be much difference.



Q1 Religion.jpg
Fig3.(Believe particular religion N=126 Not believe particular religion N=126)
A comparison between people who have specific religion and people who do not.
There does not seem to be much difference.



Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.


[Check / No Check]

Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.
Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.
Q2.3 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can save people in disease.
Q2.4 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can save people in disease.
Q2.5 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.
Q2.6 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.
Q2.7 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can improve our life.
Q2.8 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can improve our life.
Q2.9 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.
Q2.10 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.
Q2.11 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can advance science.
Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.


Q2 Religionist vs Irreligionist.jpg

Fig4.(Believe particular religion N=126 Not believe particular religion N=126)
A comparison between people who have specific religion and people who do not.
People who do not have specific religion permit using living things for experiments than people who have specific religion.
Q2 generetion.jpg
Fig5.(10~19 N=92 20~29 N=68 30~49 N=45 50~ N=46)
A comparison by generation.
20s permit using living things for experiments than other generation.



Q2 male vs female.jpg
Fig6.(male N=111 female N=141)
A comparison between male and female.
Male permit using living things for experiments than female.



Q2 yes vs no(Q1).jpg
Fig7.(Q1 yes N=135 Q1 no N=117) A comparison between people who answered YES at Q1 and who answered NO.
There doesn't seem to be any difference.



Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?


[ I know well./ I know only its name./ I do not know at all.]


Q3 male vs female.jpg

Fig8.(male N=173 female N=210)
A comparison between male and female
The propotion of males who answered "I kwow" about genetically modification (GM) is higher than that of females.



Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?


[Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene./ Partly yes, some can be but others are not./ No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.]


Q4 male vs female.jpg

Fig9.(male N=204 female N=227)
Q4 religion(chi-square).jpgQ4 religion.jpg
Fig10.(Belive particular religion N=242 Not believe particular religion N=189)
Q4 religion.jpg
Fig11.(Yes N=72 Partly yes N=217 no N=142)



Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.


[Check/ No Check]
Q5.1 Bacteria  Q5.2 Wheat Q5.3 Honeybee Q5.4 Killifish  Q5.5 Frog
Q5.6 Chickens  Q5.7 Mouse Q5.8 Dog Q5.9 Monkey Q5.10 Human beings


Q5 religion(chi-square).jpg
Fig12.(Chiristian N=71 Buddist N=105 Irreligionist N=189)
The graph shows the difference according to religion.
The graph of Buddhist is almost the same with that of Irreligionist, which shows that the higher the animals are, the less people who thinks their genes can be modified. From honey bee to human beings,Christian who thinks genetically modification is permitted takes up about 15%.
Q5 Asia vs Europe.jpg
Fig13.(Asia N=332 Europe N=82)
A comparison between Asian and Europe.
The graph is similar with the one which compares between religions. The graph of Asian is similar to that of Buddhist and Irreligionist, while the graph of Europe is similar to that of Christian.
Q5 Asia male vs female.jpg
Fig14.(male N=150 female N=166)
A comparison between male and female in Asia.
This graph shows the difference between male and female from Asia. The number of males who allow genetically modification is larger than that of females.
Europe male vs female.jpg
Fig15.(male N=30 female N=44)
A comparison between male and female in Europe.
The number of males who answered that genetically modification is admitted in E. coli and mice is larger than that of females. About other living things, there is no difference between male and female.



Result


Q1.When we see fig2 and fig3 there doesn't seem any difference. When we see fig1 the number of 20s to 50s people who chose yes is larger than that of other generation.


Q2.The standard of the answer to this question is whether the answer places an importance on the profit they may gain through animal experiments, or the agony the animals feel through these experiments.

We asked whether animal experiments can be allowed from three points, “saving human beings”, “useful to our life”, “contribution to the development of science”

As a result, people who answered that animal experiment can be performed if it is for saving human beings was obviously larger than the other two points.

As for the difference by sex, male seems to be more generous to animal experiment, and place an importance on the profit of the human beings while female seem to place an importance on the animals’ pain.

When we compared by a religion or generation, there seemed to be no significant difference.


Q5.Significant difference is observed by different sex, region and religion.

In terms of sex, males tend to permit genetically modification than females.

In terms of region, half of people in Asia answered that they admit using living things such as E. coli and wheat for experiments. About 35% of them permit using mice and 20% permit using dogs and monkeys. On the other hand, many people in Europe admit using E. coli and wheat. However, no more than 15% of them permit using other living things.

In terms of religion, about 50% of Buddhist and Irreligionist answerer permit using E. coli and wheat. The more complicate structures of subjects are, the less people admit. Christian answerer admit rate using E. coli and wheat is also higher than other alternatives rate, which is about 15%.