Judging/Poster Guidelines
From 2013.igem.org
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<table style="padding-bottom: 30px;"> | <table style="padding-bottom: 30px;"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
In order to guide teams as they create their team poster, the Judging Committee would like to outline the poster judging guidelines used to analyze team posters. | In order to guide teams as they create their team poster, the Judging Committee would like to outline the poster judging guidelines used to analyze team posters. | ||
Line 28: | Line 26: | ||
#Attribution: the poster is a opportunity to give credit to contributors who may not be present, and also to other scientists (e.g. earlier workers or competitors). Referencing and attribution is often not practical during a talk, but the poster offers a chance to record who thought of what. Attribution should be for key concepts and not details (i.e. ~ 5 references but not 20). | #Attribution: the poster is a opportunity to give credit to contributors who may not be present, and also to other scientists (e.g. earlier workers or competitors). Referencing and attribution is often not practical during a talk, but the poster offers a chance to record who thought of what. Attribution should be for key concepts and not details (i.e. ~ 5 references but not 20). | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
- | + | __NOTOC__ | |
- | + | __NOEDITSECTION__ |