Team:Dundee/Project/DetectionComparison

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 66: Line 66:
<div class="row">
<div class="row">
-
<div class="span12">
+
  <div class="span12">
-
<h2><b>Results</b></h2>
+
  <h2><b>Results</b></h2>
-
</div>
+
  </div>
-
<div class="span12">
+
  <div class="span12">
 +
    <div class="span6" style="text-align: justify">
 +
      At the detection times, t = 24 hours and t = 1 hour, the ratio for the number of microcystin molecules is 8.4 million : 1.<br><br>
 +
      Correspondingly after 24 hours there can be up to 8.4 million times more microcystin molecules present than there is after 1 hour. Putting this ratio into perspective, this is the same as the height of the Empire State Building being compared with the combined height of 7 <i>E.coli</i>.<br><br>
 +
      Therefore in the time period between collection of samples and obtaining results there can be vast increases in the concentration of microcystin present in the water body. This emphasises that HPLC is an unsuitable method for toxin detection and that a 1 hour detection period is much more efficient.<br><br>
 +
      Generally we can conclude that faster detection methods are necessary and our biological detector is worthwhile pursuing if we can reduce this detection time. <br><br>
 +
      </div>
-
<div class="span6" style="text-align: justify">
+
      <div class="span6">
 +
        <div class="span6"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/bf/Equations_Image_3.jpg">
 +
        </div>
 +
        <div class="span6"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/bf/Equations_Image_3.jpg">
 +
        </div>
 +
      </div>
 +
  </div>
-
At the detection times, t = 24 hours and t = 1 hour, the ratio for the number of microcystin molecules is 8.4 million : 1.<br><br>
+
  </div>
-
 
+
-
Correspondingly after 24 hours there can be up to 8.4 million times more microcystin molecules present than there is after 1 hour. Putting this ratio into perspective, this is the same as the height of the Empire State Building being compared with the combined height of 7 <i>E.coli</i>.<br><br>
+
-
 
+
-
Therefore in the time period between collection of samples and obtaining results there can be vast increases in the concentration of microcystin present in the water body. This emphasises that HPLC is an unsuitable method for toxin detection and that a 1 hour detection period is much more efficient.<br><br>
+
-
 
+
-
Generally we can conclude that faster detection methods are necessary and our biological detector is worthwhile pursuing if we can reduce this detection time. <br><br>
+
-
 
+
-
</div>
+
-
 
+
-
<div class="span6">
+
-
 
+
-
<div class="span6"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/bf/Equations_Image_3.jpg">
+
-
</div>
+
-
 
+
-
<div class="span6"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/bf/Equations_Image_3.jpg">
+
-
</div>
+
-
 
+
-
</div>
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
</div>
+

Revision as of 15:39, 3 September 2013

iGEM Dundee 2013 · ToxiMop