Team:Dundee/Project/PP1Capacities

From 2013.igem.org

Revision as of 13:55, 2 October 2013 by Kyleharrison (Talk | contribs)

iGEM Dundee 2013 · ToxiMop

Introduction

Microcystin’s toxic action lies in its ability to bind to and deactivate the human Protein Phosphatase-1 (PP1). Microcystin covalently binds to PP1 in a one-to-one relation between a single Microcystin molecule and a single PP1 molecule. Therefore, higher binding potentials of a PP1 mop are achieved by producing larger amounts of PP1 in the bacterial chassis (E. coli and B. subtilis).

The two options explored for our mop bacteria were to export PP1 to the periplasm of E. coli and onto the membrane surface of B. subtilis. We investigated the PP1-binding capacity of both chassis options based upon geometrical packing, which allowed us to determine which chassis had a higher microcystin binding potential.

Theory

When considering the maximum number of PP1 molecules physically compacted into the periplasm of E. coli or onto the membrane surface of B. subtilis, considerations for wasted space must be taken into account. This wasted space arises due to the impossibility of using all of the available space due to the circular configuration of PP1.

Before beginning such analysis, assumptions must be made regarding the shape and form which the PP1 molecule adopts. To best describe the PP1 protein shape, without unnecessary over complication, PP1 was approximated as a sphere with a radius equal to the average width of the unit cell in three dimensions. This approximation allows for the ability to assume random orientation of the PP1 molecules and gives an average result. The radius of PP1 is then calculated as ~9.1nm. .

In calculating the available volume of an E. coli or B. subtilis cell, the bacterial cells were approximated as cylindrical bodies with hemispherical ends. Furthermore, the dimensions of E. coli and B. subtilis cells were taken as being approximately equivalent and were based upon the known dimensions of E. coli. “Each bacterium measures approximately 0.5 μm in width by 2 μm in length.”[2] .

The equations describing the volumes of spheres of radius r and cylinders of radius r and height h are given:



Making use of this approximation and these equations, the volume of an E. coli cell can be calculated as the volume of a cylinder of radius 0.25μm and height 1.5μm and the volume of a sphere of radius 0.25μm (the two hemispheres can be brought together and calculated as a single sphere).



E. coli

Calculating the periplasmic volume of E. coli, the inner form (representing the inner membrane and its cytoplasmically-enclosed contents) would have a cylindrical body of radius 0.25-0.021μm and a length of 1.5μm. The two hemispheres flanking the cylinder would be of radius 0.25-0.021μm. Calculating the total volume of the inner form gives:



Thus, the volume of the periplasm in E. coli is calculated to be:





To determine the number of PP1 molecules which could occupy the periplasm, we must determine the volume of space which a single PP1 molecule would occupy. This volume of a PP1 molecule can be taken as the volume of the unit sphere of diameter 9.1nm. However, when considering the amount of space that a single PP1 molecule will occupy the space in between molecules must also be considered. To take into account this wasted space, a cubic approximation was made:



By assumption, the PP1 molecules take up the excess room which would be included within a cube of length equal to their radius allowing the wasted space to be accounted for.

Thus, the volume of a PP1 molecule is given:



From this, the number of PP1 molecules which can suitably occupy the periplasm of E. coli can be calculated:



B. subtilis

Results

E. coli can store a significantly larger amount of PP1 than B. subtilis. This is because the volume of the periplasm in E. coli is much greater than the available surface volume of B. subtilis.

The maximum number of PP1 which can fit onto the surface of B. subtilis is between 60,000 -70,000, whereas the maximum number of PP1 which can be packed into the periplasm of E. coli is between 150,000 -200,000.

Consequently the E. coli chassis has a greater PP1 capacity and higher microcystin binding potential. Therefore using E. coli requires fewer cells to mop up a fixed concentration of microcystin, making it a more efficient mop.

As a result we focussed the wet team’s time and efforts more on developing the E. coli mop to form the prototype ToxiMop.