Team:TU-Delft/Timer Plus Sumo

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 50: Line 50:
|4.16
|4.16
|Maximum transcription rate of T7
|Maximum transcription rate of T7
-
|#m/min
+
|#<sub>m</sub>/min
| [[Team:TUDelft/Modeling_References|[2]]]
| [[Team:TUDelft/Modeling_References|[2]]]
|-
|-
Line 56: Line 56:
|2.79
|2.79
|Maximum transcription rate of Ptet
|Maximum transcription rate of Ptet
-
|#m/min
+
|#<sub>m</sub>/min
| [[Team:TUDelft/Modeling_References|[4]]]
| [[Team:TUDelft/Modeling_References|[4]]]
|-
|-
Line 62: Line 62:
|1.79
|1.79
|Maximum transcription rate of Pci
|Maximum transcription rate of Pci
-
|#m/min
+
|#<sub>m</sub>/min
| [[Team:TUDelft/Modeling_References|[3]]]
| [[Team:TUDelft/Modeling_References|[3]]]
|-
|-

Revision as of 12:48, 15 September 2013

Timer Plus Sumo


In this section the system of Figure 1 is modeled. The structure of the timer has two repressing promoters (PcI and Ptet) and the input is the T7 promoter and the output is the protease Ulp-1. This Ulp-1 cleaves off the SUMO from the produced SUMO-peptide.


Figure 1: Circuit of the timer including sumo cleaving

Differential Equations

The above circuit can be represented by the following differential equations. We assume a binary behavior of the T7 promoter. In the presence of IPTG, the T7 promoter will be active. So, we make the assumption that the T7 is binary variable with two possible states: either active 1 or inactive 0.


Parameters


Parameter Value Description Units Reference
ca 1020 Translation rate per amino acid min-1#a-1 [7]
cT7 4.16 Maximum transcription rate of T7 #m/min [2]
cptet 2.79 Maximum transcription rate of Ptet #m/min [4]
cci 1.79 Maximum transcription rate of Pci #m/min [3]
dmRNA 0.231 Degradation rate of mRNA min-1 [8]
dTET 0.1386 Degradation rate of TET min-1 [9]
dCI 0.042 Degradation rate of CI min-1 [9]
dPEP 2.1*10-3 Degradation rate of the peptide min-1 Assumed the same as GFP
dPSU 6.3*10-3 Degradation rate of the peptide plus SUMO min-1 Assumed the same as GFP
dUlp 1.263*10-2 Degradation rate of Ulp min-1 Assumed twice the rate of GFP
lt7 0.002 Leakage factor of T7 - Assumption
lptet 0.002 Leakage factor of Ptet - Assumption
lci 0.002 Leakage factor of Pci - Assumption
ktet 6 Dissociation constant of Ptet #m [10]
kci 20 Dissociation constant of Pci #m [10]
kcUlp 3 Turnover rate of Ulp min-1 [6]
nci 3 Hills coefficient - [11]
ntet 3 Hills coefficient - [11]
s 0 or 1 Activation/Inactivation of T7 promoter Binary Assumption
sci 228 Length of CI amino acids [12]
sPSU 18 + 110 Length of peptide plus SUMO amino acids [12]
sTET 206 Length of TET amino acids [13]
sUlp 233 Length of Ulp1 amino acids [13]


Results

Here the results are given of the simulation upon activating the T7 promoter. For starting conditions the steady state values of the concentrations are used when T7 is switched off.


Figure 2: Simulation Results


A second simulation is run, in which only SUMO-peptide is produced as there is no Ulp. This will allow some confirmation of the values with the literature.

Discussion

In the graph the effect of the timer is clearly observed, at first the peptide+SUMO is produced, and after approximatly 80 minutes more Ulp is produced leading to an increased cleaving of the SUMO. Also note that there is cleaving of the SUMO already from the start, as the promoters are somewhat leaky.