Team:UCL/Practice/Neuroethics

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 48: Line 48:
-
<img src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/5/54/Neuroethics.png"><div class="col_right" style="height:100 Spx;width:200 Spx"><a href="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/5/54/Neuroethics.png" data-lightbox="image-3" title="Neuroethics UCL iGEM 2013"><img src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/5/54/Neuroethics.png"></a></div>
+
<div class="col_right" style="height:100 Spx;width:200 Spx"><a href="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/5/54/Neuroethics.png" data-lightbox="image-3" title="Neuroethics UCL iGEM 2013"><img src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/5/54/Neuroethics.png"></a></div>

Revision as of 10:08, 9 September 2013

THE NEUROETHICS REPORT

Why Look At Neuroethics?

Our project deals with an idea which may seem, on the face of it, frightening to some; the insertion of modified brain cells, microglia, to try and alleviate Alzheimer's disease. Although more similar to a macrophage than a neuron, engineering microglial cells represents both a scientific and an ethical challenge, not least because it seems like the stuff of zombie B-movies. In the interests of assessing the feasibility of the project in social terms, we are producing this report dealing with the attitudes and neuroethics of the use of genetic engineering in medicine, as well as expounding a little on some of the scientific concepts behind various approaches.

The Essay

In a comprehensive report, team member Alexander Bates takes a look at the medical ethics, the neuroethics and both the plausible and fanciful neuroscientific applications of synthetic biology: PDF GOES HERE.