Team:UNITN-Trento/Safety

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 4: Line 4:
<!--CSS-->
<!--CSS-->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:UNITN-Trento/CSS/Project_pages&action=raw&ctype=text/css" type="text/css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:UNITN-Trento/CSS/Project_pages&action=raw&ctype=text/css" type="text/css" />
-
 
+
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:UNITN-Trento/CSS/Extra/Safety&action=raw&ctype=text/css" type="text/css" />
-
<style>
+
-
#tn-content .container {
+
-
background-color: rgb(238, 232, 78)!important;
+
-
background-image: url(http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/b/bf/Tn-2013_Onda-fruitripening.png)!important;
+
-
}
+
-
.path {
+
-
width: 90%;
+
-
+
-
}
+
-
#brunoide {margin-bottom:30px!important;width:59%; display:inline-block!important;border:2px solid white;box-shadow:2px 2px 4px #323232;}
+
-
</style>
+
-
 
+
<div class="container">
<div class="container">
Line 27: Line 15:
When we decided to engineer a biological system able to produce ethylene, we looked at all the already characterized pathways. At first we checked the plants ethylene producing pathway, because we wanted to work on fruit ripening and we knew that ethylene is a plant hormone able to accelerate this process.
When we decided to engineer a biological system able to produce ethylene, we looked at all the already characterized pathways. At first we checked the plants ethylene producing pathway, because we wanted to work on fruit ripening and we knew that ethylene is a plant hormone able to accelerate this process.
</p>
</p>
-
<center><img class="path" src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/b/bb/Tn-2013-project_ethylene-Plants_path.jpg"/></center>
+
<img src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/b/bb/Tn-2013-project_ethylene-Plants_path.jpg"/>
-
<p>
+
 
-
+
<div class="tn-double-wrap">
-
</p>
+
<img class="photo" title="This is the exception that proves the rule. Bruno is in fact allergic to almost all fruit and would die in any case!!!" src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/5/5a/Tn-2013-bruno_face_2.jpg" /></center>
-
+
<p class="text">
-
<img title="This is the exception that proves the rule. Bruno is in fact allergic to almost all fruit and would die in any case!!!" id="brunoide" src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/5/5a/Tn-2013-bruno_face_2.jpg" style="width: 350px; margin-left: 30px;" /></center>
+
But then we stumbled upon a problem in this pathway: it produces hydrogen cyanide as byproduct, an highly toxic gas that inhibits the cytochrome C oxydase enzyme.
-
<p style="display: inline-block; width: 400px; vertical-align: middle; margin-left: 45px;">
+
<font color="red"><b>It can kill a human</b></font> within 10 minutes even at very low concentration (around 300 ppm).
-
But then we stumbled upon a problem in this pathway: it produces hydrogen cyanide as byproduct, an highly toxic gas that inhibits the cytochrome C oxydase enzyme.
+
Plants however have a detox mechanism that gets rid of this hazardous product. That's why we do not die when we eat fruit!<br/>
-
<font color="red"><b>It can kill a human</b></font> within 10 minutes even at very low concentration (around 300 ppm).
+
<br/>
-
Plants however have a detox mechanism that gets rid of this hazardous product. That's why we do not die when we eat fruit!<br/>
+
The plant pathway would have been a convenient way to produce ethylene. It already contains SAM synthetase, that our team exploit also for methyl salycilate production. However, we tried to look further into alternative pathways.<br/>
-
<br/>
+
<br/>
-
The plant pathway would have been a convenient way to produce ethylene. It already contains SAM synthetase, that our team exploit also for methyl salycilate production. However, we tried to look further into alternative pathways.<br/>
+
</p>
-
<br/>
+
</div>
-
</p>
+
 
<p>
<p>
We found three alternative pathways: one very complicated and involving superoxide species, and the remaining two exploiting the same enzyme derived from <i>Pseudomonas syringae</i>. <i>Ps</i> is a plant pathogen bacteria able to produce ethylene through a reaction catalyzed by the 2-Oxoglutarate Oxygenase/Decarboxylase enzyme. It takes 2-Oxoglutarate  
We found three alternative pathways: one very complicated and involving superoxide species, and the remaining two exploiting the same enzyme derived from <i>Pseudomonas syringae</i>. <i>Ps</i> is a plant pathogen bacteria able to produce ethylene through a reaction catalyzed by the 2-Oxoglutarate Oxygenase/Decarboxylase enzyme. It takes 2-Oxoglutarate  
as substrate and transforms it into ethylene, water and carbon dioxyde (Goto M. Plant and Cell Physiology (2012) 26, 141-150).  
as substrate and transforms it into ethylene, water and carbon dioxyde (Goto M. Plant and Cell Physiology (2012) 26, 141-150).  
</p>
</p>
-
+
<img src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/f/f8/Tn-2013-project_ethylene-Eth_path.jpg" />
-
<center><img class="path" src="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/f/f8/Tn-2013-project_ethylene-Eth_path.jpg" /></center>
+
-
<span class="tn-subtitle">
+
-
A solution to avoid unsafe storage of ethylene cylinders
+
-
</span>
+
-
<p>
+
-
Ethylene is the simplest unsatured hydrocarbon. Like all hydrocarbons, it is asphyxiating and flammable. In the ripen facility it is stored in high pressure cylinders that can be very dangerous.<br/>
+
-
<br/>
+
-
Using our system can avoid this issue. In fact, our transformed strain cannot produce ethylene in a concentration high enough to be explosive (from 2.7% to 34% v,v is needed). With an air/culture volume ratio equal to 4 we detected and quantified around 200 ppm of ethylene.
+
-
</p>
+
-
<span class="tn-subtitle">
+
-
Precautions
+
-
</span>
+
-
<p>
+
-
We always worked with our producing ethylene bacteria under the hood. When samples were induced, cultures were maintained in special ari-thight vials with a rubber cap on top that allowed the connection to the micro-gas chromatograph. Also for MeSA we worked in safe conditions since it is harmful and irritating. We carefully checked the MSDS for both <a href="http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/PleaseWaitMSDSPage.do?language=&country=IT&brand=FLUKA&productNumber=03484&PageToGoToURL=http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/fluka/03484?lang=it&region=IT">ethylene</a> and <a href="http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=IT&language=it&productNumber=M6752&brand=SIAL&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsial%2Fm6752%3Flang%3Dit">MeSA</a>.
+
-
</p>
+
-
<span class="subtitle">
+
-
Safety Form
+
-
</span>
+
-
<p>
+
-
We used some strains of <i>E. coli</i> (NEB 10beta, NEB5 alpha, BL21, TOP10, TB1, JM29) and one strain of <i>B. subtilis</i> (168). All these strains belong to the risk group 1. In our project we used only one biobrick coming from organisms of the second risk group:
+
-
<ul>
+
-
<li>BBa_J45319: catalyses the production of salycilate from chorismate and comes from <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>;</li>
+
-
</ul>
+
-
If released accidentally, our engineered microorganisms would not pose any risk to the public. The amount of ethylene or MeSA produced in the open air would be too low to be dangerous to people. The same goes for the environmental risk: both the compounds are naturally synthesized by plants. However some issues might occur if the system is scaled-up, anyway our vending machine will not contain sufficient ethylene to be risky. Besides, most of our parts are under control of inducible promoters. Furthermore the strain of <i>B. subtilis</i> that we used is auxotrophic for thriptofane (and also threonine if transformed). Also the transformed strains (both in <i>E. coli</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i>) for ethylene production show a slower growth since the pathway starts from a TCA cycle intermediate: we expect our transformed bacteria to be overwhelmed by the wild type (but we need to assess this).<br/>
+
-
<center><span class="tn-effect">If you are interested in more informations and details please check our <a href="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/9/98/Tn-2013-UniTN_Trento_Safety.pdf">Safety form</a></span></center>  
+
-
</p>
+
<span class="tn-subtitle">A solution to avoid unsafe storage of ethylene cylinders</span>
 +
<p>
 +
Ethylene is the simplest unsatured hydrocarbon. Like all hydrocarbons, it is asphyxiating and flammable. In the ripen facility it is stored in high pressure cylinders that can be very dangerous.
 +
</p>
 +
<p>
 +
Using our system can avoid this issue. In fact, our transformed strain cannot produce ethylene in a concentration high enough to be explosive (from 2.7% to 34% v,v is needed). With an air/culture volume ratio equal to 4 we detected and quantified around 200 ppm of ethylene.
 +
</p>
 +
<span class="tn-subtitle">Precautions</span>
 +
<p>
 +
We always worked with our producing ethylene bacteria under the hood. When samples were induced, cultures were maintained in special ari-thight vials with a rubber cap on top that allowed the connection to the micro-gas chromatograph. Also for MeSA we worked in safe conditions since it is harmful and irritating. We carefully checked the MSDS for both <a href="http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/PleaseWaitMSDSPage.do?language=&country=IT&brand=FLUKA&productNumber=03484&PageToGoToURL=http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/fluka/03484?lang=it&region=IT">ethylene</a> and <a href="http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=IT&language=it&productNumber=M6752&brand=SIAL&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsial%2Fm6752%3Flang%3Dit">MeSA</a>.
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<span class="subtitle">Safety Form</span>
 +
<p>
 +
We used some strains of <i>E. coli</i> (NEB 10beta, NEB5 alpha, BL21, TOP10, TB1, JM29) and one strain of <i>B. subtilis</i> (168). All these strains belong to the risk group 1. In our project we used only one biobrick coming from organisms of the second risk group:
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>
 +
BBa_J45319: catalyses the production of salycilate from chorismate and comes from <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>;
 +
</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
 +
If released accidentally, our engineered microorganisms would not pose any risk to the public. The amount of ethylene or MeSA produced in the open air would be too low to be dangerous to people. The same goes for the environmental risk: both the compounds are naturally synthesized by plants. However some issues might occur if the system is scaled-up, anyway our vending machine will not contain sufficient ethylene to be risky. Besides, most of our parts are under control of inducible promoters. Furthermore the strain of <i>B. subtilis</i> that we used is auxotrophic for thriptofane (and also threonine if transformed). Also the transformed strains (both in <i>E. coli</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i>) for ethylene production show a slower growth since the pathway starts from a TCA cycle intermediate: we expect our transformed bacteria to be overwhelmed by the wild type (but we need to assess this).
 +
</p>
 +
<span class="tn-effect">If you are interested in more informations and details<br />please check our <a href="http://2013.igem.org/wiki/images/9/98/Tn-2013-UniTN_Trento_Safety.pdf">Safety form</a></span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 21:21, 26 September 2013

Safety Ethylene pathway selection

When we decided to engineer a biological system able to produce ethylene, we looked at all the already characterized pathways. At first we checked the plants ethylene producing pathway, because we wanted to work on fruit ripening and we knew that ethylene is a plant hormone able to accelerate this process.

But then we stumbled upon a problem in this pathway: it produces hydrogen cyanide as byproduct, an highly toxic gas that inhibits the cytochrome C oxydase enzyme. It can kill a human within 10 minutes even at very low concentration (around 300 ppm). Plants however have a detox mechanism that gets rid of this hazardous product. That's why we do not die when we eat fruit!

The plant pathway would have been a convenient way to produce ethylene. It already contains SAM synthetase, that our team exploit also for methyl salycilate production. However, we tried to look further into alternative pathways.

We found three alternative pathways: one very complicated and involving superoxide species, and the remaining two exploiting the same enzyme derived from Pseudomonas syringae. Ps is a plant pathogen bacteria able to produce ethylene through a reaction catalyzed by the 2-Oxoglutarate Oxygenase/Decarboxylase enzyme. It takes 2-Oxoglutarate as substrate and transforms it into ethylene, water and carbon dioxyde (Goto M. Plant and Cell Physiology (2012) 26, 141-150).

A solution to avoid unsafe storage of ethylene cylinders

Ethylene is the simplest unsatured hydrocarbon. Like all hydrocarbons, it is asphyxiating and flammable. In the ripen facility it is stored in high pressure cylinders that can be very dangerous.

Using our system can avoid this issue. In fact, our transformed strain cannot produce ethylene in a concentration high enough to be explosive (from 2.7% to 34% v,v is needed). With an air/culture volume ratio equal to 4 we detected and quantified around 200 ppm of ethylene.

Precautions

We always worked with our producing ethylene bacteria under the hood. When samples were induced, cultures were maintained in special ari-thight vials with a rubber cap on top that allowed the connection to the micro-gas chromatograph. Also for MeSA we worked in safe conditions since it is harmful and irritating. We carefully checked the MSDS for both ethylene and MeSA.

Safety Form

We used some strains of E. coli (NEB 10beta, NEB5 alpha, BL21, TOP10, TB1, JM29) and one strain of B. subtilis (168). All these strains belong to the risk group 1. In our project we used only one biobrick coming from organisms of the second risk group:

  • BBa_J45319: catalyses the production of salycilate from chorismate and comes from Pseudomonas aeruginosa;
If released accidentally, our engineered microorganisms would not pose any risk to the public. The amount of ethylene or MeSA produced in the open air would be too low to be dangerous to people. The same goes for the environmental risk: both the compounds are naturally synthesized by plants. However some issues might occur if the system is scaled-up, anyway our vending machine will not contain sufficient ethylene to be risky. Besides, most of our parts are under control of inducible promoters. Furthermore the strain of B. subtilis that we used is auxotrophic for thriptofane (and also threonine if transformed). Also the transformed strains (both in E. coli and B. subtilis) for ethylene production show a slower growth since the pathway starts from a TCA cycle intermediate: we expect our transformed bacteria to be overwhelmed by the wild type (but we need to assess this).

If you are interested in more informations and details
please check our Safety form