Team:Groningen/Achievements/medal

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 18: Line 18:
|Present poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
|Present poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
|-
|-
-
|[[File:Green_tick.gif | 25px |link= ]]
+
|[[File:Green_tick.gif | 25px |link= :Team:Groningen/Navigation/Parts ]]
|Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device
|Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device
|-  
|-  

Revision as of 09:11, 13 September 2013

Medal fullfillment

Bronze Medal
25px Team Registration
Not check.png Complete Judging form
25px Team Wiki
Not check.png Present poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
25px Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device
Silver Medal
Not check.png Validate at least one new Biobrick
Not check.png Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
Not check.png Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).
Not check.png Your project may have implications for the environment, security, safety and ethics and/or ownership and sharing. Describe one or more ways in which these or other broader implications have been taken into consideration in the design and execution of your project.
Gold Medal
Not check.png Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), create a new registry page for the improved part, and submit this part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).
25px Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
Not check.png Your project may have implications for the environment, security, safety and ethics and/or ownership and sharing. Describe a novel approach that your team has used to help you and others consider these aspects of the design and outcomes of synthetic biology efforts. Please justify its novelty and how this approach might be adapted and scaled for others to use.