Team:Groningen/Safety
From 2013.igem.org
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<h2>Introduction</h2> | <h2>Introduction</h2> | ||
- | + | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
In 1983 the World Health Organization (WHO) published the first edition of the laboratory biosafety manual. This manual was composed for countries over the | In 1983 the World Health Organization (WHO) published the first edition of the laboratory biosafety manual. This manual was composed for countries over the | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | <DIV ALIGN="right"><TABLE BORDER="0"> | + | <DIV ALIGN="right"><TABLE BORDER="0"> |
- | <TR> | + | <TR> |
- | <TD HEIGHT="40"></TD> | + | <TD HEIGHT="40"></TD> |
- | <TD><h4>GMT commitments:</h4></TD> | + | <TD><h4>GMT commitments:</h4></TD> |
- | </TR> | + | </TR> |
- | <TR> | + | <TR> |
- | <TD WIDTH="500"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/36/BSL1.jpg"></img></TD> | + | <TD WIDTH="500"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/36/BSL1.jpg"></img></TD> |
- | <TD WIDTH="500" HEIGHT="500"> | + | <TD WIDTH="500" HEIGHT="500"> |
- | <ol> | + | <ol> |
<li>All GMT related work can only be performed by those people that have permission from the Biological Safety Officer (Lolkema, J. S.). Work according to the rules, even if you believe there is no apparent risk.</li> | <li>All GMT related work can only be performed by those people that have permission from the Biological Safety Officer (Lolkema, J. S.). Work according to the rules, even if you believe there is no apparent risk.</li> | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
- | </ol> | + | </ol> |
- | </TD> | + | </TD> |
- | </TR> | + | </TR> |
- | </TABLE></DIV> | + | </TABLE></DIV> |
- | <br> | + | <br> |
<p> | <p> | ||
- | <h3>Synthetic Biology</h3> | + | <h3>Synthetic Biology</h3> |
The synthetic biology is an emerging discipline in biology with possible great potential, however it brings along new biosafety and ethical questions<sup>[4]</sup>. Nowadays, the risk assessment framework is still applicable of the developments in synthetic biology, however, eventually when new developments in synthetic biology will arise the current risk assessments will not be adequate anymore<sup>[5]</sup>.<Br><br> | The synthetic biology is an emerging discipline in biology with possible great potential, however it brings along new biosafety and ethical questions<sup>[4]</sup>. Nowadays, the risk assessment framework is still applicable of the developments in synthetic biology, however, eventually when new developments in synthetic biology will arise the current risk assessments will not be adequate anymore<sup>[5]</sup>.<Br><br> | ||
- | The International Risk Governance Council (IRSC) stated risks that arose from reports of various organisations<sup>[4]</sup>:<br> | + | The International Risk Governance Council (IRSC) stated risks that arose from reports of various organisations<sup>[4] </sup>:<br> |
- | <ol> | + | <ol> |
- | <li>Insufficient basic knowledge about the potential risks posed by designed and synthetic organisms. | + | <li>Insufficient basic knowledge about the potential risks posed by designed and synthetic organisms. |
- | </li> | + | </li> |
- | <li>Uncontrolled release of novel genetically modified organisms with potential environmental or human health implications, either arising from accidental release into the environment or from applications entailing deliberate release. | + | <li>Uncontrolled release of novel genetically modified organisms with potential environmental or human health implications, either arising from accidental release into the environment or from applications entailing deliberate release. |
- | </li> | + | </li> |
- | <li>Bio-terrorism, biological warfare and the construction of novel organisms designed to be hostile to human interests. | + | <li>Bio-terrorism, biological warfare and the construction of novel organisms designed to be hostile to human interests. |
- | </li> | + | </li> |
- | <li>The possible emergence of a ‘bio-hacker’ culture in which lone individuals develop dangerous organisms much as they currently create computer viruses. | + | <li>The possible emergence of a ‘bio-hacker’ culture in which lone individuals develop dangerous organisms much as they currently create computer viruses. |
- | </li> | + | </li> |
- | <li>Patenting and the creation of monopolies, inhibiting basic research and restricting product development to large companies. | + | <li>Patenting and the creation of monopolies, inhibiting basic research and restricting product development to large companies. |
- | </li> | + | </li> |
- | </ol><br> | + | </ol><br> |
Many of those safety and ethical questions have been discussed in Schmidt, M. 2009<sup>[6]</sup>. | Many of those safety and ethical questions have been discussed in Schmidt, M. 2009<sup>[6]</sup>. | ||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
[6] Schmidt, M. Systems and Synthetic Biology 3, 1-4, Special Issue: Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology | [6] Schmidt, M. Systems and Synthetic Biology 3, 1-4, Special Issue: Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology | ||
- | + | ||
</html> | </html> |
Revision as of 19:36, 20 September 2013
Safety
On this page the safety related ethics and issues are discussed.
First with a general introduction and eventually the specific related safety of our project.
First with a general introduction and eventually the specific related safety of our project.
Introduction
In 1983 the World Health Organization (WHO) published the first edition of the laboratory biosafety manual. This manual was composed for countries over the world to accept and implement the concepts of biological safety. This gave countries a scaffold to develop their national regulations in handeling pathogenic microorganisms.
The revised version of this manual in 2004, also addresses the current biosafety issues we are facing today, e.g. the use of genetic modified organisms (GMOs)[1]. Also a more recent development is the upcoming field of synthetic biology, which brings along more biosafety and ethical issues (discussed below).
In here, we will address the biological safety issues directly on our project with detailed information described by various organisations such as the WHO and the Commission on Genetic Modification (COGEM).
Infective microorganisms are classified, for laboratory work, by four risk groups. In this iGEM project we are working with Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. For E. coli it is known that it can cause irritation to skin, eyes, and respiratory tract, and could affect kidneys,
however this is a low individual and community risk[2]. B. subtilis is
unlikey to cause any harm to individual and community, and is also Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) [3].
In this case, the only relevant risk group for our project is Risk Group 1 (no or low individual and community risk). Microorganisms classified in this
group are unlikely to cause human or animal diseases are classified in this group. For Risk Group 1 a Basic Biosafety Level 1 (BSL1) laboratory is
required.
For our project we work on a BSL1 lab and all persons that do laboratory related work have a Good Microbiological Techniques (GMT) certificate. With this
certificate we are approved to work with Risk Group 2 organisms in a BSL2 laboratory according to the advice of the Royal Dutch Society of Microbiology.
GMT commitments: |
|
|
Synthetic Biology
The synthetic biology is an emerging discipline in biology with possible great potential, however it brings along new biosafety and ethical questions[4]. Nowadays, the risk assessment framework is still applicable of the developments in synthetic biology, however, eventually when new developments in synthetic biology will arise the current risk assessments will not be adequate anymore[5].The International Risk Governance Council (IRSC) stated risks that arose from reports of various organisations[4] :
- Insufficient basic knowledge about the potential risks posed by designed and synthetic organisms.
- Uncontrolled release of novel genetically modified organisms with potential environmental or human health implications, either arising from accidental release into the environment or from applications entailing deliberate release.
- Bio-terrorism, biological warfare and the construction of novel organisms designed to be hostile to human interests.
- The possible emergence of a ‘bio-hacker’ culture in which lone individuals develop dangerous organisms much as they currently create computer viruses.
- Patenting and the creation of monopolies, inhibiting basic research and restricting product development to large companies.
Many of those safety and ethical questions have been discussed in Schmidt, M. 2009[6].
Our Project: The Coating GEMs
Safety Precautions on the lab
Safety Aspects of Our Project
Community
Environmental
References
[1] Laboratory biosafety manual 3rd reversion, WHO[2] Website from American Biological Safety Association (ABSA): www.absa.org/riskgroups/bacteriasearch.php?genus=&species=coli
[3] Singh, M et al. Microbial Cell Factories 2009, 8:38
[4] Policy Brief: Guidelines for the Appropriate Risk Governance of Synthetic Biology from the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) 2010
[5] Synthetic Biology – Update 2013: Anticipating developments in synthetic biology, COGEM Topic Report, CGM/130117-01
[6] Schmidt, M. Systems and Synthetic Biology 3, 1-4, Special Issue: Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology