Team:Alberta/FAQ
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "<html> <head> <style type="text/css"> .titlebar { height:130px; width:100%; } .bin { background:url('/wiki/images/thumb/2/26/Background.png/541p...") |
|||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
.content-title { | .content-title { | ||
text-align:center; | text-align:center; | ||
- | font-size: | + | font-size:3em; |
} | } | ||
.titlebar h3, h4 { | .titlebar h3, h4 { | ||
Line 433: | Line 433: | ||
<div class="main"> | <div class="main"> | ||
<div class="block"> | <div class="block"> | ||
- | <p class="content-title"> | + | <p class="content-title">FAQ</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="block"> | <div class="block"> | ||
- | < | + | <h5>Doesn’t <i>E. coli</i> cause food poisoning? If <i>E. coli</i> is so dangerous, why are they being used in labs?</h5> |
- | + | <ul> | |
- | < | + | <li>Normal <i>E. coli</i> colonize the lower intestine of humans, while <b>producing Vitamin K</b> and |
- | + | <b>protecting infection</b> from other harmful bacteria.</li> | |
- | <a href="http:// | + | <li>Only some strains of <i>E. coli</i> cause food poisoning, but our group is using a <b>harmless, |
- | + | nonpathogenic strain</b>. This train is engineered to contain mutations that would not allow the <i>E. | |
+ | coli</i> to survive outside the lab without particular nutrients.</li> | ||
+ | <li><i>E. coli</i> provides a well-studied and well-known <b>model system</b> to test and troubleshoot new | ||
+ | trials on.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | <p>Reference: <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1728375/"> | ||
+ | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1728375/</a></p> | ||
+ | <h5>What if plasmids containing <b>antibiotic resistance genes</b> were released into the environment despite | ||
+ | precautions?</h5> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>These genes are used in synthetic biology as selection tools.</li> | ||
+ | <li>There are lower chances of gene uptake by wild bacteria compared to lab-strain bacteria which | ||
+ | have perforated membranes.</li> | ||
+ | <li>In the case that wild bacteria did uptake the antibiotic resistance gene, that gene would | ||
+ | eventually be lost in the population without exposure to the antibiotic, because it is then a | ||
+ | disadvantage for the bacteria to carry the unused plasmids. (Evidence observed in past with the | ||
+ | decline of specific antibiotic resistance after the human population limited that antibiotic).</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 22:33, 21 September 2013
FAQ
Doesn’t E. coli cause food poisoning? If E. coli is so dangerous, why are they being used in labs?
- Normal E. coli colonize the lower intestine of humans, while producing Vitamin K and protecting infection from other harmful bacteria.
- Only some strains of E. coli cause food poisoning, but our group is using a harmless, nonpathogenic strain. This train is engineered to contain mutations that would not allow the E. coli to survive outside the lab without particular nutrients.
- E. coli provides a well-studied and well-known model system to test and troubleshoot new trials on.
Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1728375/
What if plasmids containing antibiotic resistance genes were released into the environment despite precautions?
- These genes are used in synthetic biology as selection tools.
- There are lower chances of gene uptake by wild bacteria compared to lab-strain bacteria which have perforated membranes.
- In the case that wild bacteria did uptake the antibiotic resistance gene, that gene would eventually be lost in the population without exposure to the antibiotic, because it is then a disadvantage for the bacteria to carry the unused plasmids. (Evidence observed in past with the decline of specific antibiotic resistance after the human population limited that antibiotic).