Team:Alberta/FAQ
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
} | } | ||
.bin { | .bin { | ||
- | background:url('/wiki/images/ | + | background:url('/wiki/images/e/e4/2013AlbertaBackground.png'); |
background-size:100% auto; | background-size:100% auto; | ||
padding-top:20px; | padding-top:20px; | ||
Line 387: | Line 387: | ||
<li><a id="project" href="#">Project</a> | <li><a id="project" href="#">Project</a> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/ | + | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/Background">Background</a></li> |
- | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/ | + | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/Overview">Overview</a></li> |
- | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/ | + | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/FutureDevelopment">Future Development</a></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li><a id="notebook" href="#">Notebook</a> | <li><a id="notebook" href="#">Notebook</a> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/ | + | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/Results">Results</a></li> |
+ | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/Protocols">Protocols</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="/Team:Alberta/Parts">BioBricks</a></li> | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/Parts">BioBricks</a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> |
Revision as of 19:30, 24 September 2013
FAQ
Doesn’t E. coli cause food poisoning? If E. coli is so dangerous, why are they being used in labs?
- Normal E. coli colonize the lower intestine of humans, while producing Vitamin K and protecting infection from other harmful bacteria.
- Only some strains of E. coli cause food poisoning, but our group is using a harmless, nonpathogenic strain. This train is engineered to contain mutations that would not allow the E. coli to survive outside the lab without particular nutrients.
- E. coli provides a well-studied and well-known model system to test and troubleshoot new trials on.
Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1728375/
What if plasmids containing antibiotic resistance genes were released into the environment despite precautions?
- These genes are used in synthetic biology as selection tools.
- There are lower chances of gene uptake by wild bacteria compared to lab-strain bacteria which have perforated membranes.
- In the case that wild bacteria did uptake the antibiotic resistance gene, that gene would eventually be lost in the population without exposure to the antibiotic, because it is then a disadvantage for the bacteria to carry the unused plasmids. (Evidence observed in past with the decline of specific antibiotic resistance after the human population limited that antibiotic).