"
Judging
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<li>Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected</li> | <li>Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected</li> | ||
<li>Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.</li> | <li>Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.</li> | ||
| - | <li>Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).</li></ol> | + | <li>Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).</li> |
| + | <li>Your project may have implications for the environment, security, safety and ethics and/or ownership and sharing. Describe one or more ways in which these or other broader implications have been taken into consideration in the design and execution of your project.</li></ol> | ||
<b>Gold</b>: In addition to the Bronze and Silver Medal requirements, any one or more of the following: <br> | <b>Gold</b>: In addition to the Bronze and Silver Medal requirements, any one or more of the following: <br> | ||
| Line 45: | Line 46: | ||
<li>Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), create a new registry page for the improved part, and submit this part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).<br><i>The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended.</i></li> | <li>Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), create a new registry page for the improved part, and submit this part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).<br><i>The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended.</i></li> | ||
<li>Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.</li> | <li>Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.</li> | ||
| - | <li> | + | <li>Your project may have implications for the environment, security, safety and ethics and/or ownership and sharing. Describe a novel approach that your team has used to help you and others consider these aspects of the design and outcomes of synthetic biology efforts. Please justify its novelty and how this approach might be adapted and scaled for others to use.</li></ol> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 18 June 2013
Please note the medal criteria are still under review. You can use the existing criteria, but check back to make sure you meet all the requirements before the Jamborees!
The following is a list of Awards given by the iGEM Judges and some general information about how Award decisions are made. For examples of award-winning work, see the 2012 Jamboree Results.
REGIONAL JAMBOREES
I. iGEM Medals: All teams can earn medals. Teams must nominate themselves using the Judging Form, which will be available later.
The three levels of medals, from lowest to highest are Bronze, Silver, and Gold. Requirements for each medal are:
Bronze. The following 5 goals must be achieved:
II. Software Track Medals: Special medals are awarded to teams in the Software Tools track. Teams must nominate themselves using the Judging Form.
- Team registration
- Complete Judging form
- Team Wiki
- Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
- Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines). A new application of and outstanding documentation (quantitative data showing the Part’s/ Device’s function) of a previously existing BioBrick part in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry also counts.
- Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected
- Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
- Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).
- Your project may have implications for the environment, security, safety and ethics and/or ownership and sharing. Describe one or more ways in which these or other broader implications have been taken into consideration in the design and execution of your project.
- Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), create a new registry page for the improved part, and submit this part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).
The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended. - Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
- Your project may have implications for the environment, security, safety and ethics and/or ownership and sharing. Describe a novel approach that your team has used to help you and others consider these aspects of the design and outcomes of synthetic biology efforts. Please justify its novelty and how this approach might be adapted and scaled for others to use.
See the Software page for details on Software Judging.
