|
|
(One intermediate revision not shown) |
Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| | | |
| |- valign="top" | | |- valign="top" |
- | | style="width: 18%; background-color: transparent;"| | + | | style="width: 20%; background-color: transparent;"| |
| | | |
| <font color="#333399" size="3" font face="Calibri"> | | <font color="#333399" size="3" font face="Calibri"> |
| | | |
- | : [[Team:BYU_Provo/Phage_Purification|Overview]] | + | <font size = "4"> |
| + | |
| + | : <u> '''Phage Purification''' </u> </font> |
| | | |
| : [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/Phage_Purification/Winterexp|March-April]] | | : [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/Phage_Purification/Winterexp|March-April]] |
Line 26: |
Line 28: |
| </font> | | </font> |
| | | |
- | | style="width: 82%; background-color: transparent;"| | + | |
| + | |
| + | | style="width: 80%; background-color: transparent;"| |
| | | |
| <font face="Calibri" size="3"> | | <font face="Calibri" size="3"> |
| | | |
| <br> | | <br> |
- | <html> <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/Phage_Purification/Winterexp/Period1/Dailylog"><< Previous</a> | + | <html> <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/Phage_Purification/Winterexp/Period1/Dailylog"><< Previous</a> |
| | | |
| <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/Phage_Purification/Winterexp/Period4/Dailylog" style="display:block;float:right;">Next >></a> | | <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/Phage_Purification/Winterexp/Period4/Dailylog" style="display:block;float:right;">Next >></a> |
Line 74: |
Line 78: |
| | | |
| <font size="4"> '''4/8/13''' </font> | | <font size="4"> '''4/8/13''' </font> |
| + | |
| + | -We performed a phage titer test to determine which bacteria would be most viable for our phage propagation. |
| + | |
| + | : [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/Phage_Purification/Winterexp/Period1/Exp/4.8BacteriaDeterminingTiter|4.8 Bacteria Determining Titer]] |
| | | |
| -We performed a phage titer test to determine which bacteria would be most viable for our phage propagation. | | -We performed a phage titer test to determine which bacteria would be most viable for our phage propagation. |
Phage Purification March - April Notebook: April 1 - April 14 Daily Log
|
- Phage Purification
- March-April
- May-June
- July-August
- September-October
|
<< Previous
Next >>
4/2/13
- Created a 50 mL liquid culture of W3110
- 4.2 W3110 50mL Liquid Culture
-We also put 500 µL of 40% glycerol into cryovials for use tomorrow to prepare freezer sotcks.
4/3/13
- Created 5 liquid cultures of W3110 to create 1 mL glcerol stocks of bacteria.
- 4.3 W3110 Liquid Culture
4/4/13
- We made glycerol stocks W3110 E. Coli
- 4.4 Glycerol Stocks
- We put .5mL glycerol in cryovials and .5mL liquid culture from the overnights prepared yesterday.
- We vortexed each tube for 10 seconds and then we stored the tubes in the -80°C freezer in Dr. Grose’s lab.
4/5/13
- We did spot tests of phage on E. Coli BL21
- 4.5 Phage Spot Test
4/8/13
-We performed a phage titer test to determine which bacteria would be most viable for our phage propagation.
- 4.8 Bacteria Determining Titer
-We performed a phage titer test to determine which bacteria would be most viable for our phage propagation.
- We used BL21 and W3110 strains of E. Coli.
- We placed 100 µL of broth into 5 ependorf tubes.
- We used as phage 10 µL of 1L, 10L, 40T4, T4DOS, and T4 infected phage and placed them each in one of tubes labeled -1.
- We performed a dilution series taking out 10 µL each time and placing it into the next tube, 5 times. The total volume in the last tube was 110 µL.
- We added 4.5 mL of 1X top agar to .5 mL of broth and plated it on LB plates.
- We spotted each concentration on the plates and incubated it overnight at 37°C.
-Results from 04/08:
- Phage 10L w/ w3110 had large scale infection every concentration
- Phage 10L w/ BL21 had infection in very large concentrations
- Phage 1L w/ w3110 had infection in very large concentrations
- Phage 1L w/ BL21 had infection in very large concentrations
- Phage T4 DOS w/ w3110 had infection in very large concentrations
- Phage T4 DOS w/ BL21 had infection in very large concentrations
- Phage 40 T4 w/ w311o had no phage infection
- Phage 40 T4 w/ BL21 had large scale infection at every concentration
- Phage T4 inf w/ w311o had large scale infection at every concentration
- Phage T4 inf w/ BL21 had large scale infection at every concentration
- We had a significant amount of running that occurred on almost every plate, so the results were a little difficult to read. We concluded that the phage is a high enough concentration that we would have to do another phage titer to a smaller dilution in order to determine actual concentration. The controls were all a lawn of bacteria.
4/10/13
-We performed titers of T4 infected phage from off of two separate E. Coli strands, BL21 and W3110.
- We added .1mL of the liquid culture to 1 mL of both strands of bacteria.
- After allowing infection to occur overnight, we centrifuged the tubes to separate the bacteria from the phage.
- We separated the supernatant into a new eppendorf tube, and used 10 µL as the 0 concentration.
- We then performed a phage titer using five tubes of 90 µL LB each, adding 10 µL from each one to the next.
- Using a micropipette we spotted 2µL of each dilution onto both 4.5 ml 1x plates and .5 mL W3110 plates.
- To avoid smearing, we allowed the plates to sit for over an hour and then we incubated them at 37 C overnight.
-Results:
- The concentrations we used are still way too strong. We will have to dilute the concentration even further if we want to see anything more than cleared plaques.
4/12/13
-We watched presentations from the Cholera Group Today
<< Previous
Next >>
|