Team:Freiburg/Project/modeling

Introduction

Effectors

Effector Control

Targeting

uniBAss

Manual

Modeling

Introduction

The Network

uniCAS-VP16

Our network includes four different components uniCas-VP16, a RNA complex (cr/tracr RNA), a RNA-uniCas-VP16 complex and the Secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP). UniCas-VP16 binds the RNA-complex and the whole complex binds the DNA, which leads to the production of SEAP.

Setting up the ODE

According to the graphical reaction network the ODE can be set up.

Cas9 is constitutively expressed by the CBh promoter and degraded proportional to the current concentration. It is used to build the DNA recognition complex and produced during complex decay.

d[Cas]/dt = k₁ - k₂ ∗ [Cas] - k₅ ∗ [Cas] ∗ [tracr,crRNA] + [tracr,crRNA,Cas]

The RNA-complex is build linearly. The production constant can be seen as production constant of the lower expressed RNA, because this expression regulates the complex building. It is assumed that the RNA is degraded after DNA recognition complex decay and therefore the complex decay does not lead to more RNA.

d[tracr,crRNA]/dt = k₃ - k₄ ∗ [tracr,crRNA] - k₂ ∗ [tracr,crRNA] ∗ [Cas]

The complex is build, when Cas9 and RNA meets and degraded proportional to the current DNA recognition complex-concentration.

d[tracr,crRNA,Cas]/dt = k₅ ∗ [Cas] ∗ [tracr,crRNA] - k₆ ∗ [tracr,crRNA,Cas]

There is a leaky SEAP production and one that depends on the current concentration of the Cas9/RNA Complex. This dependency is assumed to follow the Michaelis-Menten-Rules. Because of the long half time (T₂ > 500 h) of SEAP we can neglect the SEAP decay.(Müller et al., 2013 )

d[SEAP]/dt = k₇ + k₈∗ ([tracr,crRNA,Cas]/(k₉+[tracr,crRNA,Cas])))

The parameters are:
k1: linear production rate of Cas9 k2: Cas9 degradation rate k3: cr/trRNA production rate k4: cr/trRNA degradation rate k5: cr/trRNA /Cas9 complex building rate	k6: cr/trRNA /Cas9 degradation rate k7: SEAPs leaky production rate k8: Complex dependent SEAP production rate k9: Michaelis-Menten constant

Finding the parameters

Up to this point, it is only a theoretical description, which fits to every four component system connected in the given way. The reason is, that the parameter values are not yet defined and therefore there is a n-dimensional hypothesis space which contains the hypothesis which fits to the Cas9-system (n is the number of parameters). At least you assume this. Finding this hypothesis means finding the right parameters.

To find these parameters we use a method called maximum likelihood. The maximum likelihood hypothesis is the hypothesis which has the highest probability to generate the measured data. It is shown (Müller et al., 2013 ), that using the maximum likelihood approach and assuming gaussion noise in the data leads to a least-square error minimization problem.

A minimization problem is an optimization problem. You search for parameters (p0) for which holds, that the value of the function (f) at the point of the parameters is smaller than all other values. (f(p0)<=f(p)). In three dimensions the function can be thought as a landscape and minimization is finding the deepest valley. Depending on the method you use different problems arise. The most common problem is finding only a local minimum and not the global one.

To avoid this and to be sure to have found a global minimum we started our minimization procedure using different start values for our parameters. To sample these parameters we used the latin hypercube sampling on a logarithmic scale.

N is set as the number of different initial parameter settings and the parameter range is divided by N. For the initial parameter the values are chosen so that there is only one parameter in each row and column.

The resulting errors we plotted in an increasing order to be sure to have found a global minimum.

Data generation

Cas is quantified by using Western blot and we used SEAP as target protein that can be quantified by a SEAP assay. For more detailed information refer our modeling notebook.

Fitting Procedure and Results

Assuming the given ODE and using the fminsearch-function implemented in matlab with various initial parameter vectors the fitting process results in one optimal parameter composition (Table.1). During the fitting process not only the kinetic parameters were assumed as variable, but also the initial concentrations, because our first measured point is at time point 6 h. However the model is written in a way that the change between flexible and variable parameters is easily to perform, because of an additional vector (qfit). This vector contains boolean values depending on wether the parameter is fixed or flexible during the fitting process. Moreover another parameter is required for adjusting the absoulte values of the duplicates.

The model reflects the general construction of the network (Fig.2). As assumed Cas seems to converge assymptotically to a stable state and there is an exponential increase in the SEAP concentration. The model also shows a potential behaviour of the not measured components, the free tracr/crRNA-complex and the gene recognition complex. The tracr/crRNA-complex seems to rise linearly, however the small curvature underlines the assumption of a steady state. There is no free gene recognition complex during the measured time periode, which means that after tracr/crRNA binding the complex immediatly binds to DNA.

The Code Files