Team:ETH Zurich/Experimentalresults
From 2013.igem.org
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<h1> Experimental results overview </h1> | <h1> Experimental results overview </h1> | ||
- | <p = align"justify">In our game, we use the LuxI-LuxR quorum sensing system to transport the signal from the sender (mine) to the receiver (non-mine) cells. We started experiments using LuxI producing sender cells and OHHL inducible GFP expressing receiver cells. We used this sender-receive module to characterize [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_2 OHHL diffusion] in agar plates. The main goal of these experiments was to find conditions regarding time and distance for the design of the game grid. Having set these parameters, we tried to construct a library of pLux promoters with OHHL sensitivities differing from those of the wild type pLux. Through site-saturation [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_5 promoter mutagenesis] we changed the LuxR binding sites. The promoter variants were characterized studying OHHL dose response curves and we were able to select for two mutant variants.</p> | + | <p = align"justify">In our game, we use the LuxI-LuxR quorum sensing system to [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Modeling/Reaction_Diffusion_OOHL transport the signal] from the sender (mine) to the receiver (non-mine) cells. We started experiments using LuxI producing sender cells and OHHL inducible GFP expressing receiver cells. We used this sender-receive module to characterize [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_2 OHHL diffusion] in agar plates. The main goal of these experiments was to find conditions regarding time and distance for the design of the game grid. Having set these parameters, we tried to construct a library of pLux promoters with OHHL sensitivities differing from those of the wild type pLux. Through site-saturation [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_5 promoter mutagenesis] we changed the LuxR binding sites. The promoter variants were characterized studying OHHL dose response curves and we were able to select for two mutant variants.</p> |
Revision as of 01:58, 5 October 2013
Experimental results overview
In our game, we use the LuxI-LuxR quorum sensing system to transport the signal from the sender (mine) to the receiver (non-mine) cells. We started experiments using LuxI producing sender cells and OHHL inducible GFP expressing receiver cells. We used this sender-receive module to characterize OHHL diffusion in agar plates. The main goal of these experiments was to find conditions regarding time and distance for the design of the game grid. Having set these parameters, we tried to construct a library of pLux promoters with OHHL sensitivities differing from those of the wild type pLux. Through site-saturation promoter mutagenesis we changed the LuxR binding sites. The promoter variants were characterized studying OHHL dose response curves and we were able to select for two mutant variants.
In parallel we characterized our hydrolase reporter system by testing different substrates and investigating kinetics. During all of these experiments we encountered problems with the leakiness of the pLux promoter meaning that there was basal expression of reporter even in the absence of OHHL. By testing different LuxR generating constructs we tried to minimize the leakiness of the system, because we expect our enzymatic reporter system to be even more sensitive than the fluorescent protein reporters. So far we have successfully set up the game structure with the wild type pLux promoter and a GFP reporter. We have characterized one possible promoter variant with a much lower sensitivity for OHHL and we successfully used five different hydrolases without observing crosstalk. Using a positive feedback loop we could also reduce the basal expression of LuxR and therefore the leakiness of the system