Team:Groningen/Project/Construct

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(22 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<html>
<html>
-
<h1>Production backbone</h1>
+
 
 +
<h1>Backbone</h1>
Line 10: Line 11:
<!--BETTER VERSION??
<!--BETTER VERSION??
One of the big challenge of the iGEM Groningen project is the production of the silk protein in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. In order to face such a challenge the so called "<b>production backbone</b>" has been created.
One of the big challenge of the iGEM Groningen project is the production of the silk protein in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>. In order to face such a challenge the so called "<b>production backbone</b>" has been created.
-
<br>
+
</p>
-
The backbone has been developed as an improved version of the <i>amyE</i> locus intergration backbone from Munich's iGEM team 2012 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>). Thus didn't contain any promoter, therefore the HyperSpank IPTG inducible promoter (Rudner's Lab 2004) has been added. The production backbone can be
+
<p>
 +
The backbone has been developed as an improved version of the <i>amyE</i> locus intergration backbone from Munich's iGEM team 2012 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>). Thus didn't contain any promoter, therefore the HyperSpank IPTG inducible promoter (Rudner's Lab 2004) has been added. The production backbone (Fig 2) (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1085014">BBa_K1085014</a>) can be then used for the production of the desired protein upon IPTG induction.
 +
</p>
-->
-->
-
To transform <i>B. subtilis</i> with our developed biobricks we have improved the <i>amyE</i> intergrational backbone from Munich's iGEM team 2012 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>) that had no inducible promoter. We've added the HyperSpank IPTG inducible promoter from Rudner's Lab 2004. This promoter is placed right in front of the prefix, so any biobrick can be inserted in this backbone (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1085014">BBa_K1085014</a>) and can be induced with IPTG.<p>
+
<p>
 +
To transform <i>B. subtilis</i> with our developed silk biobricks we have improved the <i>amyE</i> integrational backbone from Munich's iGEM team 2012 (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K823023">BBa_K823023</a>) that had no inducible promoter. We have added the HyperSpank IPTG inducible promoter from Rudner's Lab 2004. This promoter is placed right in front of the prefix, so any biobrick can be inserted in this backbone (fig 2) (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1085014">BBa_K1085014</a>) and can be induced with IPTG.</p>
 +
<p>
In figure 1 a close-up of the promoter is shown.  
In figure 1 a close-up of the promoter is shown.  
 +
</p>
<p>The HyperSpank promoter has a single nucleotide change (G->T) at the -1 position. This increases the expression levels but also causes leaky expression when IPTG is absent [1].
<p>The HyperSpank promoter has a single nucleotide change (G->T) at the -1 position. This increases the expression levels but also causes leaky expression when IPTG is absent [1].
To improve repression, a second lacO operator site has been inserted 71 bp upstream of the first (David Rudner, Harvard Medical School).
To improve repression, a second lacO operator site has been inserted 71 bp upstream of the first (David Rudner, Harvard Medical School).
-
 
+
</p>
<div align="left">  <!--you can use left/right or center to align the image-->
<div align="left">  <!--you can use left/right or center to align the image-->
-
<table  id="layout" width=60%> <!--change the percentage to determine the size of your image-->
+
<table  id="layout" width=65%> <!--change the percentage to determine the size of your image-->
<tr>
<tr>
<td>
<td>
Line 30: Line 36:
<tr>
<tr>
<td>
<td>
-
<font size="1">Figure 1: The HyperSpank promoter with in orange the lacO operators, in red the -35, -10, +1 signals and in green the prefix.</font>
+
<font size="1"><p>Figure 1: The HyperSpank promoter with in orange the lacO operators, in red the -35, -10, +1 signals and in green the prefix.</p></font>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 39: Line 45:
<br>
<br>
<div align="left">  <!--you can use left/right or center to align the image-->
<div align="left">  <!--you can use left/right or center to align the image-->
-
<table  id="layout" width=50%> <!--change the percentage to determine the size of your image-->
+
<table  id="layout" width=80%> <!--change the percentage to determine the size of your image-->
<tr>
<tr>
<td>
<td>
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/ab/BBa_K1085014.PNG" width="100%"> <!--only insert the link, do not change the percentage!-->
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d8/Backbone_fancy.png" width="100%"> <!--only insert the link, do not change the percentage!-->
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
<td>
<td>
-
<font size="1">Figure 2: BBa_K1085014 with: The <i>amp</i> gene for ampicillin resistance in <i>E. coli</i>; The <i>cat</i> gene for chloramphenicol resistance in <i>B. subtilis</i>; The HyperSpank promoter with its repressor <i>lacI</i>; The <i>amyE</i> up- and downstream fragments for intergration in the <i>amyE</i> locus. </font>
+
<font size="1"><p>Figure 2: BBa_K1085014 with: The <i>amp</i> gene for ampicillin resistance in <i>E. coli</i> (not shown); The <i>cat</i> gene for chloramphenicol resistance in <i>B. subtilis</i>; The HyperSpank promoter with its repressor <i>lacI</i>; The <i>amyE</i> up- and downstream fragments for intergration in the <i>amyE</i> locus.</p> </font>
</td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
Line 53: Line 59:
</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
-
 
+
For the validation of this backbone, click <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Groningen/Lab/experiments/Backbone">here</a>.
-
<h3>Promoter activity</h3>
+
-
 
+
-
<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1085014">BBa_K1085014</a> was constructed with two variants of GFP (one form our group and one from the biobrick system, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_E0840">BBa_E0840</a>). BBa_K1085014-GFPmg and BBa_K1085014-BBa_E0840 were transformed to <i>B. subtilis</i>. Overnight cultivated strains were diluted 1:100 in fresh medium and grown till OD~0.45 and induced with 1mM IPTG. A 1,2 and 3 hour sample was analysed under the microscope, results are shown in figure 3.
+
-
<div align="left">  <!--you can use left/right or center to align the image-->
+
-
<table  id="layout" width="100%"> <!--change the percentage to determine the size of your image-->
+
-
 
+
-
<tr>
+
-
<td>
+
-
<b>Figure 3<br> A:</b>
+
-
</td>
+
-
<td>
+
-
<br><b>B:</b>
+
-
</td>
+
-
<td>
+
-
<br><b>C:</b>
+
-
</td>
+
-
</tr>
+
-
 
+
-
<tr>
+
-
<td>
+
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/61/WtT0-1_photo.png" width="100%"></img>
+
-
</td>
+
-
 
+
-
<td>
+
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/dd/GFPdsm_expression.png" width="150%"></img>
+
-
</td>
+
-
 
+
-
<td>
+
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/70/BBa_E0840_experssion.png" width="150%"></img>
+
-
</td>
+
-
 
+
-
<!-- https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/1/16/GFPdsm_%2BGFP840.jpg -->
+
-
</td>
+
-
</tr>
+
-
 
+
-
</table>
+
-
</div>
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
<table id="layout">
+
-
<tr>
+
-
<td>
+
-
<font size="1">Figure 3: In (a) An overlay picture is shown from the phase-contrast and GFP-channel picture. In (b,c) the intensity in of ~40 cells in the GFP-channel, were analyzed from two pictures. The average intensity (AU) from the cells are plotted above with the standard deviation. In (b) a GFP from our group is shown and in (c)a biobricked GFP (BBa_E0840) is shown in a plot. wt=wildtype, T0= before induction, T1,2,3=#h of induction with IPTG.</font>
+
-
</td>
+
-
</tr>
+
-
</table>
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
<br>
<br>
-
 
+
<br>
-
 
+
<h2>References</h2>
 +
<font size="1">
 +
[1] &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Quisel, John D., William F. Burkholder, and Alan D. Grossman. "In vivo effects of sporulation kinases on mutant Spo0A proteins in Bacillus subtilis." Journal of bacteriology 183.22 (2001): 6573-6578.
 +
</font>
</html>
</html>

Latest revision as of 03:44, 5 October 2013

Backbone

An amyE locus integration backbone

To transform B. subtilis with our developed silk biobricks we have improved the amyE integrational backbone from Munich's iGEM team 2012 (BBa_K823023) that had no inducible promoter. We have added the HyperSpank IPTG inducible promoter from Rudner's Lab 2004. This promoter is placed right in front of the prefix, so any biobrick can be inserted in this backbone (fig 2) (BBa_K1085014) and can be induced with IPTG.

In figure 1 a close-up of the promoter is shown.

The HyperSpank promoter has a single nucleotide change (G->T) at the -1 position. This increases the expression levels but also causes leaky expression when IPTG is absent [1]. To improve repression, a second lacO operator site has been inserted 71 bp upstream of the first (David Rudner, Harvard Medical School).

Figure 1: The HyperSpank promoter with in orange the lacO operators, in red the -35, -10, +1 signals and in green the prefix.

Figure 2: BBa_K1085014 with: The amp gene for ampicillin resistance in E. coli (not shown); The cat gene for chloramphenicol resistance in B. subtilis; The HyperSpank promoter with its repressor lacI; The amyE up- and downstream fragments for intergration in the amyE locus.

For the validation of this backbone, click here.

References

[1]      Quisel, John D., William F. Burkholder, and Alan D. Grossman. "In vivo effects of sporulation kinases on mutant Spo0A proteins in Bacillus subtilis." Journal of bacteriology 183.22 (2001): 6573-6578.

Retrieved from "http://2013.igem.org/Team:Groningen/Project/Construct"