Team:ETH Zurich/Experimentalresults

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 41: Line 41:
</html>
</html>
-
<p>In parallel we characterized our hydrolase [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_3 reporter system] by testing [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_3 different substrates and investigating kinetics]. During all of these experiments we encountered problems with the leakiness of the pLux promoter, meaning that there was basal expression of reporter even in the absence of AHL. By testing different LuxR generating constructs we tried to minimize the [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_6 leakiness] of the system, because we expect our enzymatic reporter system to be even more sensitive than the fluorescent protein reporters. So far we have [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_6 successfully set up] the game structure with the wild type P<sub>Lux</sub> promoter and a GFP reporter. We have characterized one possible promoter variant with a much lower sensitivity for AHL and we successfully used five different hydrolases without observing crosstalk. </p>
+
<p>In parallel we characterized our hydrolase [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_3 reporter system] by testing [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_3 different substrates and investigating kinetics]. During all of these experiments we encountered problems with the leakiness of the P<sub>Lux</sub> promoter, meaning that there was basal expression of reporter even in the absence of AHL. By testing different LuxR generating constructs we tried to minimize the [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_6 leakiness] of the system, because we expect our enzymatic reporter system to be even more sensitive than the fluorescent protein reporters. So far we have [https://2013.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/Experiments_6 successfully set up] the game structure with the wild type P<sub>Lux</sub> promoter and a GFP reporter. We have characterized one possible promoter variant with a much lower sensitivity for AHL and we successfully used five different hydrolases without observing crosstalk. </p>
<br clear="all"/>
<br clear="all"/>
{{:Team:ETH_Zurich/templates/footer}}
{{:Team:ETH_Zurich/templates/footer}}

Revision as of 16:40, 28 October 2013

Header2.png
80px-Eth igem logo.png

Experimental results overview

In our game, we use the LuxI-LuxR quorum sensing system to transport the signal from the sender (mine) to the receiver (non-mine) cells. We started experiments using LuxI producing sender cells and AHL inducible GFP expressing receiver cells. We used this sender-receive module to characterize AHL diffusion in agar plates. The main goal of these experiments was to find conditions regarding time and distance for the design of the game grid. Having set these parameters, we tried to construct a library of PLuxR promoters with AHL sensitivities differing from those of the wild type PLuxR. Through site-saturation promoter mutagenesis we changed the LuxR binding sites. The promoter variants were characterized studying AHL dose response curves and we were able to select for several mutant variants.


In parallel we characterized our hydrolase reporter system by testing different substrates and investigating kinetics. During all of these experiments we encountered problems with the leakiness of the PLux promoter, meaning that there was basal expression of reporter even in the absence of AHL. By testing different LuxR generating constructs we tried to minimize the leakiness of the system, because we expect our enzymatic reporter system to be even more sensitive than the fluorescent protein reporters. So far we have successfully set up the game structure with the wild type PLux promoter and a GFP reporter. We have characterized one possible promoter variant with a much lower sensitivity for AHL and we successfully used five different hydrolases without observing crosstalk.