Team:Virginia/Project Overview

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(17 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 181: Line 181:
#menu11 ul li:hover span.text a{
#menu11 ul li:hover span.text a{
     text-decoration:none;
     text-decoration:none;
-
color:#2B60DE;
+
color:#66CCFF;
}
}
#btext {
#btext {
Line 203: Line 203:
         border: 1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.3);
         border: 1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.3);
         padding: 10px;
         padding: 10px;
 +
}
 +
#groupbio span {
 +
font-size:20px;
 +
text-decoration:underline;
 +
padding-top:50px;
}
}
</style>
</style>
Line 231: Line 236:
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Results">Results</a></p>
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Results">Results</a></p>
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Modeling">Modeling</a></p>
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Modeling">Modeling</a></p>
-
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Applications">Applications</a></p></span>
+
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Software">Software</a></p>
 +
 
 +
                <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Chassis_Improvements">Chassis Improvements</a></p></span>
         </li>
         </li>
         <li>
         <li>
Line 242: Line 249:
         </li>
         </li>
         <li>
         <li>
-
                <span class="title">Human Practices</span>
+
                          <span class="title">Human Practices</span>
                 <span class="text">
                 <span class="text">
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Human_Practices_Overview">Overview</a></p>
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Human_Practices_Overview">Overview</a></p>
-
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Public_Perception">Public Perception</a></p>
+
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Safety Considerations">Safety Considerations</a></p>
-
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Relevance">Relevance</a></p>
+
                 <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/High_School_Education_Series">High School Education Series</a></p>
-
          <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Outreach">Outreach</a></p></span>
+
                <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Documentary">Documentary</a></p>
 +
                <p><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Virginia/Media_Coverage">Media Coverage</a></p>
 +
</span>
         </li>
         </li>
         <li>
         <li>
Line 260: Line 269:
<div id="groupbio">
<div id="groupbio">
<div id="btext">
<div id="btext">
-
<p> <p style="text-indent: 5em;">Our team made a significant effort to not only focus on our work in the lab, but also concentrate on our contributions to and considerations of the human practices and ethical aspects of synthetic biology. Over the course of the summer, we filmed a mini-documentary, critically evaluated the advantaged of minicells over liposomes, and developed a high school workshop series.  </p>
+
<span><u>Project Overview</u></span>
-
 
+
<br><br>
-
<p>See the links to the following in our Human Practices Menu:</p>  
+
<p><u> Opportunity: Synthesizing a Better Drug Delivery Vector </u></p>
-
 
+
<p> <p style="text-indent: 5em;">Every freely administered drug causes side effects. Cancer is a classic example. Because of off-target toxicity, many cancer patients have to hope that their chemotherapy kills their cancer before it kills them.  </p>
-
<p><p style="text-indent: 5em;"> Public Perception – In a short documentary, we interviewed three experts in biology, medicine and bioethics and explored topics in biosafety, ownership in synthetic biology, and the potential impacts of our minicell research. Also available on this page in the 2013 Basic Safety Form, which we consulted with the UVa Environmental Health & Safety Department to successfully complete.</p>  
+
<p style="text-indent: 5em;"> Many drug delivery nano-vectors have been developed to address this issue. However, most have severely limiting disadvantages. For example, liposomes, the vector projected to have the largest market share in the next ten years, are often expensive to produce and leaky in functionality. </p>
-
 
+
<p><p style="text-indent: 5em;">Bacteria have several properties that would make them an interesting alternative drug delivery vectors.
-
<p><p style="text-indent: 5em;">Relevance – In this section, we critically evaluated the advantaged conferred by minicells over liposomes. By extensively consulting the available literature and through our own research, we found that minicells offer a significant advantage over liposomes through increased stability, increased half-life, and a reduced leakage of cytosolic elements. We believe this has significant human practices applications as minicells will offer a more accessible and safer alternative to liposomal applications.</p>  
+
<ul><li>Their surface membranes can be modified for targeting </li>
-
 
+
<li>Biological and can accommodate Biobricks </li>
-
<p><p style="text-indent: 5em;"> Outreach – This fall, we partnered with Renaissance High School in Charlottesville, VA to offer a comprehensive 6-workshop curriculum to students. Our goal was to develop a workshop series that may be implemented by any iGEM team in order to foster the development of high school iGEM teams. Links to all materials used for the workshop, including a syllabus, instructor notes, PowerPoints, interactive activities and recommended readings are available on this page.</p>  
+
<li>Easily grown and manufactured, unlike many other drug delivery vectors. </li>
 +
</ul></p>  
 +
<br>
 +
<p style="text-indent: 5em;"> Unfortunately, as in the case of many potential synthetic biology applications, the utility of bacteria as vectors is limited by safety concerns. Our initial investigation on this problem led us to a forgotten discovery from the 1950’s—the bacterial minicell. </p>
 +
<p style="text-indent: 5em;"> Minicells are small, achromosomal products of aberrant cell division. Because they lack chromosomes , they cannot replicate, mutate, or express virulent bacteria genes. However, they still express transfected plasmids, which means that minicells remain fully compatible with standardized biobrick parts. While largely neglected for decades, minicells are only now resurfacing, in the wake of the recent, explosive growth of the modern biotechnology industry. This past summer, we engineered the bacterial minicell into a safe, alternative chassis for drug delivery applications. </p>
  </div></div></div>
  </div></div></div>

Latest revision as of 01:54, 29 October 2013

VGEM Welcomes You!

Project Overview

Opportunity: Synthesizing a Better Drug Delivery Vector

Every freely administered drug causes side effects. Cancer is a classic example. Because of off-target toxicity, many cancer patients have to hope that their chemotherapy kills their cancer before it kills them.

Many drug delivery nano-vectors have been developed to address this issue. However, most have severely limiting disadvantages. For example, liposomes, the vector projected to have the largest market share in the next ten years, are often expensive to produce and leaky in functionality.

Bacteria have several properties that would make them an interesting alternative drug delivery vectors.

  • Their surface membranes can be modified for targeting
  • Biological and can accommodate Biobricks
  • Easily grown and manufactured, unlike many other drug delivery vectors.


Unfortunately, as in the case of many potential synthetic biology applications, the utility of bacteria as vectors is limited by safety concerns. Our initial investigation on this problem led us to a forgotten discovery from the 1950’s—the bacterial minicell.

Minicells are small, achromosomal products of aberrant cell division. Because they lack chromosomes , they cannot replicate, mutate, or express virulent bacteria genes. However, they still express transfected plasmids, which means that minicells remain fully compatible with standardized biobrick parts. While largely neglected for decades, minicells are only now resurfacing, in the wake of the recent, explosive growth of the modern biotechnology industry. This past summer, we engineered the bacterial minicell into a safe, alternative chassis for drug delivery applications.