"
Team:HUST-China/Modelling/Wet-lab data analysis
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
HUST LiChen (Talk | contribs) m (moved Team:HUST-China/Modelling/wet-lab data analysis to Team:HUST-China/Modelling/Wet-lab data analysis: Capitalized the title) |
HUST LiChen (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
<h4 id="methods">Methods</h4> | <h4 id="methods">Methods</h4> | ||
| - | 1.Tell the difference between single transformed cells and cotransformed cells using Q-Q plot and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test;<br> | + | 1.Tell the difference between single transformed cells and cotransformed cells using <acronym title="Quantile-Quantile Plot">Q-Q plot</acronym> and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test;<br> |
2.Use Shapiro-Wilk test and spline interpolation to confirm oscillatory florescent intensity is not a Brown movement;<br> | 2.Use Shapiro-Wilk test and spline interpolation to confirm oscillatory florescent intensity is not a Brown movement;<br> | ||
| - | + | ||
<h4 id="result">Result</h4> | <h4 id="result">Result</h4> | ||
For the first step, a Q-Q plot is used to compare two groups of data explicitly. Q-Q plot is used to compare whether two groups of data come from same distribution regardless of time dimension. In other words, well-matched Q-Q plot is one of the necessary but not sufficient conditions for judging whether two groups of data are similar to each other. Here, we present the Q-Q plot between pET-28a single transformed cells and cotransformed cells:<br> | For the first step, a Q-Q plot is used to compare two groups of data explicitly. Q-Q plot is used to compare whether two groups of data come from same distribution regardless of time dimension. In other words, well-matched Q-Q plot is one of the necessary but not sufficient conditions for judging whether two groups of data are similar to each other. Here, we present the Q-Q plot between pET-28a single transformed cells and cotransformed cells:<br> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/ce/HUST_Q-Q_Plot_of_Two_Groups.png" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/ce/HUST_Q-Q_Plot_of_Two_Groups.png" /> | ||
<p class="small">Fig 1.Q-Q plot of single transformed cells and cotransformed cells.</p><br> | <p class="small">Fig 1.Q-Q plot of single transformed cells and cotransformed cells.</p><br> | ||
| - | Apparently, these are different. To make the result more reliable, we run two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test | + | Apparently, these are different. To make the result more reliable, we run two-sample <acronym title="Kolmogorov-Smirnov test">K-S test</acronym> in the following). <br> |
| - | In | + | In K-S test, the null hypothesis is that these two groups are same. We get the p-value of this test:p=2.0470e-10;<br> |
Thus we can conclude that null hypothesis is rejected, in other words, we can conclude that these two samples come from different population. <br> | Thus we can conclude that null hypothesis is rejected, in other words, we can conclude that these two samples come from different population. <br> | ||
Then, in this part, we focus on discussion whether oscillatory behavior of cotransformed cells is only a Brown movement. <br> | Then, in this part, we focus on discussion whether oscillatory behavior of cotransformed cells is only a Brown movement. <br> | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/71/HUST_after_spline_interpolation.png" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/71/HUST_after_spline_interpolation.png" /> | ||
<p class="small">Fig 2.Oscillaroty behavior of florescent intensity from experiment.</p><br> | <p class="small">Fig 2.Oscillaroty behavior of florescent intensity from experiment.</p><br> | ||
| - | We then run Shapiro-Wilk test for the data. If the null hypothesis | + | We then run Shapiro-Wilk test for the data. If the null hypothesis is accepted, then the fluctuation of data would come from random variation. We use STATA to run the test, and we get the result, which the p-value is: p=0.00023.<br> |
Thus, null hypothesis is rejected, in other words, we can draw the conclusion that there is oscillatory behavior of this group of cells. | Thus, null hypothesis is rejected, in other words, we can draw the conclusion that there is oscillatory behavior of this group of cells. | ||
<!----------------------------------------------Main content end------------------------------------------------------> | <!----------------------------------------------Main content end------------------------------------------------------> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:17, 29 October 2013
Wet-lab Data Analysis
In this part, we process data from our wetlab in two different parts: the first one is comparing whether pET-28a single transformed cells and cotransformed cells are different, the second one is that whether the oscillatory behavior of cotransformed cells is only the result of Brownian motion.Furthermore, we make comparison between data from wetlab and drylab. In this process, our data from experiment and simulation matches well, which is a promising and satisfying result.
Methods
1.Tell the difference between single transformed cells and cotransformed cells using Q-Q plot and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test;2.Use Shapiro-Wilk test and spline interpolation to confirm oscillatory florescent intensity is not a Brown movement;
Result
For the first step, a Q-Q plot is used to compare two groups of data explicitly. Q-Q plot is used to compare whether two groups of data come from same distribution regardless of time dimension. In other words, well-matched Q-Q plot is one of the necessary but not sufficient conditions for judging whether two groups of data are similar to each other. Here, we present the Q-Q plot between pET-28a single transformed cells and cotransformed cells:
Fig 1.Q-Q plot of single transformed cells and cotransformed cells.
Apparently, these are different. To make the result more reliable, we run two-sample K-S test in the following).
In K-S test, the null hypothesis is that these two groups are same. We get the p-value of this test:p=2.0470e-10;
Thus we can conclude that null hypothesis is rejected, in other words, we can conclude that these two samples come from different population.
Then, in this part, we focus on discussion whether oscillatory behavior of cotransformed cells is only a Brown movement.
In this part, we use spline interpolation to get more data from the curve, which makes our analysis more precise, and there is little flaw doing it, since the presumption is that the curve should be smooth, which is obviously true.
Fig 2.Oscillaroty behavior of florescent intensity from experiment.
We then run Shapiro-Wilk test for the data. If the null hypothesis is accepted, then the fluctuation of data would come from random variation. We use STATA to run the test, and we get the result, which the p-value is: p=0.00023.
Thus, null hypothesis is rejected, in other words, we can draw the conclusion that there is oscillatory behavior of this group of cells.
