Team:WHU-China/templates/standardpage results
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Kevin2010LY (Talk | contribs) |
Falseplanet (Talk | contribs) |
||
(60 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | We have successfully | + | We have successfully ligated tandem double promoters with J23102 J23106 and J23116 in different orders: J23102-J23102, J23102-J23106, J23106-J23102, J23116-J23102, J23106-J23106, J23106-J23116, J23116-J23106. And we have submitted these new biobrick. Unfortunately, other combination failed because of mutation showed by sequence result.</br> |
- | + | Then we transfer the double tandem promoters with the reporter gene RFP to the expression vector pSB2K3. Through the analysis of the fluorescence/OD600 ratios,we identify the relevant transcription strength of each tandem promoter.</br> | |
+ | |||
+ | <div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/a3/Tandem_promoter_strength.png" style="height:400px;width:auto;" /></br></br></br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We measured the specifc strength of double promoters according to the fluorescence of reporter gene. Our results show that different combinations of double promoters have disparate transcriptional strength , in which the J23102-J23102 combination ranks as the best one. More importantly, once combined together, double promoters have stronger transcriptional strength compared to that of respective single promoter. In our essay, B0034 was used as a standard RBS module.</br> | ||
+ | |||
Line 26: | Line 33: | ||
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | <div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/14/WHUlyTandem_Promoters.JPG" style="width: | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/14/WHUlyTandem_Promoters.JPG" style="width:400px;height:auto;" /></br> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 34: | Line 41: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/5f/WHUlyRNA1.png" /></br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/5f/WHUlyRNA1.png" /></br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | </br> | |
Here shows the agarose electrophoresis:</br> | Here shows the agarose electrophoresis:</br> | ||
Line 42: | Line 49: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | </br></br> | + | </br> |
+ | </br> | ||
<b>dCas9 Devices</b></br> | <b>dCas9 Devices</b></br> | ||
Line 51: | Line 59: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/f2/WHUlyBB_a.png" /></br> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/f2/WHUlyBB_a.png" /></br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
Here shows the agarose electrophoresis and SDS-PAGE of BBa_1081000:</br> | Here shows the agarose electrophoresis and SDS-PAGE of BBa_1081000:</br> | ||
Line 60: | Line 69: | ||
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Multi-stage regulation results</b></br> | ||
+ | After construction of all the three components,tandem promoter, guide-RNA and dCas9, we can achieve our final goal—— | ||
+ | multi-stage regulation of the target gene expression. Here we show some results of our experiments. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/1/1d/%E5%B0%8F%E5%9B%BE-%E4%B8%89%E7%8A%B6%E6%80%81.png" /></br></br></br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | In the following figure, BBa_J23106 represents promoter 1 and BBa_J23116 represents promoter 2. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/a5/%E8%8D%A7%E5%85%89_%E5%89%AF%E6%9C%AC.jpg" style="height:400px;width:auto;" /></br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e8/Multi-stage_regulation_assay.png" style="height:500px;width:auto;" /></br></br></br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | In the following figure, BBa_J23106 represents promoter 1 and BBa_J23102 represents promoter 2. | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/58/%E8%AF%95%E7%AE%A1%E8%8D%A7%E5%85%89_%E5%89%AF%E6%9C%AC.jpg" style="height:400px;width:auto;" /></br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/7c/2-partial_repression.png" style="height:600px;width:auto;" /></br> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <b>aCas9 Devices</b></br> | ||
Then we ligate omega subunit gene downstream of dCas9.</br> | Then we ligate omega subunit gene downstream of dCas9.</br> | ||
Line 92: | Line 137: | ||
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | <div style="width:100%;text-align:center"> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/0/01/Future_work-small_pic.png" style="height:400px;width:auto" /></br> |
</div></br></br> | </div></br></br> | ||
- | First, four kinds of protein-protein interactions are designed as follows. Both dCas9 protein and alpha subunit of RNAP are fused with Gal11/ | + | First, four kinds of protein-protein interactions are designed as follows. Both dCas9 protein and alpha subunit of RNAP are fused with Gal11/CI repressor and Gal4-1/Gal4-2/VP16/CI repressor respectively. In other words, Gal11 protein interacts with Gal4-1 ,Gal4-2 and VP16 protein while dCas9-CI repressor complex can recruit RNAP through CI-CI interaction. Our goals can be eventually fulfilled when RNAP is recruited by relevant dCas9-protein complex and downstream gene expression is up-regulated as expected. </br></br> |
- | Second, based on previous research that omega subunit of RNAP can also be fused with dCas9 protein to activate gene expression, we further devise a protein-protein interaction between dCas9- | + | Second, based on previous research that omega subunit of RNAP can also be fused with dCas9 protein to activate gene expression, we further devise a protein-protein interaction between dCas9-CI repressor complex and CI-omega complex of which the strength of activation may be even higher compared to pure dCas9-omega and RNAP interaction system. </br></br> |
Latest revision as of 03:27, 29 October 2013