|
|
| (25 intermediate revisions not shown) |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | <style type="text/css"> | | <style type="text/css"> |
| | body {background-color:#aaab4d;} | | body {background-color:#aaab4d;} |
| - | #cont_column h1 {color: #033;} | + | #cont_column h1,#cont_column h2,#cont_column h3 {color: #81822f;} |
| - | #cont_column p {color: #630;} | + | #cont_column h3 {border-bottom: 2px solid #aaab4d;} |
| - | #cont_column > li{color: #630;} | + | #cont_column p,#cont_column li {color: #1d1d02;} |
| - | table {color:#630;background-color:transparent;} | + | table {color:#1d1d02;background-color:transparent;} |
| | </style> | | </style> |
| | | | |
| Line 23: |
Line 23: |
| | </head> | | </head> |
| | <body> | | <body> |
| | + | <div id="outerdiv" style="position:fixed;top:0;left:0;background:rgba(220,220,220,0.9);z-index:2;width:100%;height:100%;display:none;"><div id="innerdiv" style="position:absolute;"><img id="bigimg" style="border:5px solid #fff;" src="" /></div></div> |
| | <DIV id="animat"> | | <DIV id="animat"> |
| | <span><p>ipsc</p> | | <span><p>ipsc</p> |
| Line 33: |
Line 34: |
| | <!--正 文 部 分 开 始--> | | <!--正 文 部 分 开 始--> |
| | <DIV class="chapter"> | | <DIV class="chapter"> |
| - | <span>UPDATE <INS>09/22/2013</INS></span> | + | <span>Project/Results</span> |
| - | <h1>An Introduction to Experiments Designing</h1> | + | <h1>Overview of Results</h1> |
| | + | <p>Our experimental results are presented by two lines. One is the <strong>test for each part</strong>, the other is the <strong>test in each period of cells</strong>. </p> |
| | + | <h2><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/Result/element_test?#button02">Test for each part </a></h2> |
| | <p> | | <p> |
| - | The design of iPSC Safeguard pathway is simple and elegant. Basically, we can divide them into three major devices—the Suicide Gene, the MicroRNA-Target system and the Tet-off system, which has been described in detail in the Design module. For each device we had several candidates and before we finally assemble them into the whole pathway, we decided to test and characterize them carefully in the first place. The accurately quantitated parameters of each device then helped us set up a model and predicted which assembly scheme would work out best.
| + | Our iPSC safeguard device consists of three parts: the killer (suicide gene), the sensor (miR-122 binding site) and the switch (Tet-off system). Candidates of each part were cloned and characterized. For Suicide Gene, RIP1 and RIP3 has optimal lethal effect in both HEK293 and HepG2 while apoptin can only kill HepG2. MiR-122 target can sensitively regulate gene expression as GFP level negatively correlates with exogenous level of miR-122 transected to HEK293. Tet-off system with pTight and tTA shows a low leakage expression level and medium full expression level. Differential equations were employed to analyze and predict the performance of the pathway.</p> |
| - | </p>
| + | <p><strong>If you want to see the results for testing each parts, please click the following wheer gears.</strong></p> |
| - | <p>
| + | <div class="results_guide"> |
| - | In order to test the devices, elements were cloned into our two major plasmids backbone: pcDNA3.0(from Invitrogen) and p199(from。。。).The maps or design are shown in each parts of Results. We drove the Suicide Gene with CMV promoter to ensure a robust expression and prominent phenotype in cells. An eGFP was used to indicate the performance of Tet-off and MicroRNA-Target system, which could be quantitated through Image J and Western-Blot. All separately testing experiments were carried out via transient transfection in Bosc and HepG2, considering both the transfection efficiency and representation of liver cancer cell. Also, a survival experiment was done on liver cell to ensure that its miR122 level can successfully knockdown Suicide Gene with miR122 target-site.
| + | <a class="guide_button" id="target" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/Result/element_test?#button02"></a> |
| - | </p> | + | <a class="guide_button" id="suicidegene" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/Result/element_test?#button01"></a> |
| - | <p> | + | <a class="guide_button" id="tet-off" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/Result/element_test?#button03"></a> |
| - | After confirmation of each device, we proceeded to working on iPSC and assembly of the whole pathway. The whole pathway was integrated into two p199 plasmids, one for regulating and one for response .Lenti-virus packaging these two plasmids was produced and 3 cell lines of iPSC, HepG2, Hela were transfected. This successfully gave us the stable cell line with our iPSC Safeguard design. Then further test and characterization of the pathway’s performance of working as a whole were carried out. All the data can be seen in >>>>>.
| + | <a class="guide_button" id="lenti-virus" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/Result/element_test?#button04"></a> |
| - | </p> | + | </div> |
| - | <h1>Elements Testing</h1> | + | |
| - | <h2>The Cruel Guard:Suicide Gene and Its Ancillary Facility</h2> | + | |
| - | <h3>1.Comparison between Suicide Genes: who is the most tough killer?</h3> | + | |
| | | | |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | We collected several Suicide Genes which functions in different pathways and patterns. In order to choose one that is most capable of inducing apoptosis in cancer cell, we first carried out a parallel experiment to compare their performance. The candidates were cloned into plasmid pcDNA3.0 in the MCS after CMV promoter just as shown in picture A, and then transfected into HEK293(PEI) and HepG2(Lipo2000). A GFP processed in the same way was used as a negative control to both indicate the transfection efficiency and normalize the death effect bring about by transfection process.Pictures were taken 48 hr after the transfection process.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | To achieve a better resolution of the apoptosis phenomenon, we tried two techniques with the 48hr cells. The first one is DAPI staining (done with RIP1 and RIP3), which …... The second one is PI staining and flow cytometry counting(FCM counting), a technique that can give us the exact number of cell of different state. These two techniques were complementary to each other in a certain degree, for…
| |
| - | </P>
| |
| | | | |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/a0/Suicidegene-rip1.png" />
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e5/Suicidegene-rip3.tif" />
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/64/Suicidegene-vp3.png" />
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/bc/Suicidegene-rip1_DAPI.png" />
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/ef/Hepg2_%E6%B5%81%E5%BC%8F%E5%87%8B%E4%BA%A1%E7%8E%87_%E7%BB%9F%E8%AE%A1.png" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure1. Performance of different Suicide Genes candidate in mediating apoptosis.</strong>(A).plasmids construction. (B,C) Wells transfected with RIP1\RIP3 both showed significant phenotype of apoptosis compared with GFP control, 48 hr after transfection. After DAPI staining, dead cell showed deep blue color and the phenotype was better visualized. (D)Apoptosis phenotype of Apoptin(VP3). The protein was expressed in fusion with a GFP. Compared with 0 hr , apoptosis rose 48 hr after transfection, and GFP vision indicated the transfection efficiency.(E)DAPI staining of RIP1, zoomed in vision. We can see that the dead cell is…(F).PI staining and FCM data.</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| | | | |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | The figure shows that Both RIP1 and RIP3 had a outstanding performance in mediating apoptosis. Although Apoptin also killed cell in the results, its performance wasn’t stable since we cannot reproduce the results with another construction( data not shown.) However, according to many paper, this is a powerful protein with a specificity in killing cancer cell, which persuade us to keep working with it in the latter experiments. Moreover, we also test Bax/Bax S184A with the same method. However, no significant phenotype could be observed(data not shown) and thus we abandoned them in our Suicide Gene list.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | The PI staining and FCM data showed that the apoptosis rate of RIP1 and RIP3 were about …. However, there could be some problems about the results such as a low expression level of GFP control, which made the data not so convincing. And we had planned a repeat for the experiment.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| | | | |
| - | <h3>2.Suicide Gene working with its ancillary facility</h3>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | Although we have successfully proved that each device of our pathway worked well, we wanted to further make use of the convenience of transient transfection due to the difficulty and time-consuming quality of Lenti-Virus transfection. So we designed combinational experiments, centered on our protagonist, the Suicide Gene, to further confirmed the devices’ performance in working coordinately. Although we didn’t have enough time to finished every one of them before Regional Jamboree, we have put them into our schedule of October if they’re still needed at that time(in situation where we still don’t have enough convincing data from Lenti-Virus work.)
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | <h4>A.Controlling the switch: a combination of Suicide Gene and Tet-off system.</h4>
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | Tough as the Suicide Gene is, what we expect from it was to protect instead of killing the innocent. And the 2 kinds of “innocent” cells in our designing were iPSC and Heptocyte. For iPSC, we have assigned it with a controlling panel: the Tet-Off system. Thus we designed an experiment to test the ability of Tet-off system to drive or turning off the expression of Suicide Gene. The designing and expected results were both shown below and Tet-Off construction driving GFP expressiong was taken as the positive control.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| | | | |
| - | <div class="figure"> | + | <h2><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/result/stable_assay?#button01">Test in different cells</a> </h2> |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" /> | + | |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure2.</strong>apoptosis pathway induced by hBax</p>
| + | |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | <h4>B.Rescue scheme: a combination of Suicide Gene and MicroRNA-Target system.</h4>
| + | |
| | <p> | | <p> |
| - | For Heptocyte the protection comes from functioning of MicroRNA-Target system since the miR122 level was very high in Heptocyte(see Design). Due to technical bottleneck in transfection of Heptocyte, we decided to first simulated the environment and thus designed a mini-orthogonal experiment crossing variables of Target and miR122. The designing and expected results were shown below.
| + | After prove of function, the pathway was packaged into lentivirus to test the performance in our three destiny cell types: iPSCs, hepatocytes and hepatomas. So far, we have successfully generated Oct4-GFP miPSCs with pluripotency verified. All three suicide genes have significant lethal effects in iPSCs and HepG2. With pathway integrated into the genome by lentivirus, leakage expression of TRE3G is low enough to be safe, but the pTight does not work well. Doxycycline has no obvious side effects to iPSC. Stable cell line with both TRE3G and tTA requires a little more time to finish the second round of selection and we are still waiting for result of teratoma formation from our stable iPSCs. |
| - | </p>
| + | |
| - | <p>
| + | |
| - | The results, together with the RT-qPCR data of miR122 level in Heptocyte(see。。。。), would prove that the device’s knockdown efficiency is sufficient to protect Heptocyte. Also with the mathematical model derived from Simulation experiment with GFP(see MicroRNA-Target part and Modelling), we can predict the rescue efficiency under different concentration of miR122 and target-site number.
| + | |
| | </p> | | </p> |
| | + | <p><strong>If you want to see the results testing iPSCs in different periods, please click the following cute cells.</strong></p> |
| | + | <div class="results_guide2"> |
| | + | <a class="guide_button2" id="ips" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/result/stable_assay?#button01"></a> |
| | + | <a class="guide_button2" id="hepatocyte" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/result/stable_assay?#button02"></a> |
| | + | <a class="guide_button2" id="hepatoma" href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:SYSU-China/Project/result/stable_assay?#button03"></a> |
| | + | </div> |
| | | | |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure3.</strong>apoptosis pathway induced by hBax</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <h4>C.The final test-run: combination of all three systems before setting up stable cell line</h4>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | With a idealized transfection efficiency, theoretically the three systems can be assembled and tested by simply transfect the cells with 3 plasmids(fig. ..). Plasmids A and B can turn on the Tet-off system and drive expression of GOI(Suicide Gene or GFP), while plasmid C can simulate the environment of Hepatocyte and execute the rescue scheme. Although practically it could be difficult due to efficiency and duration time limitation, we still decided to try it as a complement and see how much we can do with the transient transfection strategy. So we designed the following orthogonal experiment which, though seemingly complicated, could perfectly give a cross-reference to each variable and confirm all elements of our pathway.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure4.</strong>apoptosis pathway induced by hBax</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | We carried out the plan in HEK293 cell with PEI. However, due to technical problems no obvious results can be observed. We may try to optimize the technical factors to promote efficiency and repeat the experiment if necessary.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <h2>Simulation Testing of MicroRNA-Target Devices: Security Gate for Liver Cell</h2>
| |
| - | <h3>1.Performance comparison between target-sites: CULT and Complete</h3>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | Two kinds of target-sites were taken into consideration just as mentioned in module Design. To make a comparison between their knockdown efficiency under different concentration of miR122, another orthogonal experiment was performed and two plasmids(fig.A) were co-transfected by PEI into HEK293 cell line. Pictures were taken 24 hours after transfection.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure5. Comparison of performance of different target-sites in knocking down GFP expression. </strong>(A) Plasmids A/B/C/D produced mRNA of GFP with different target-site in its 3’ UTR. Plasmids E produced miR122 by strategy of . Plasmids used in this experiment had the problem of producing a background noise of GFP, which was solved later(see below).(B) Knockdown effect of different target site under different miR122 level. The fields of vision were chosen so that they could well represent the average level of the wells.</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| - |
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | The result shows that with the same copy number, complete target-site works better than CULT target-site, which fits the results of the 2010 Heiderburg iGEM team. What’s more, two copies target-site works better than single site, which encourage us to further build target-sites of more copy number and employed more quantitating experiments.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | Plasmid E used in the experiment produced background GFP, which was a problem neglected by us. After finding out the problem, we did quick-change to introduce a stop-codon into the CDS of GFP, which proves very efficient. The new miR122 expression plasmids were applied to other experiments just as mentioned. However, we found that although this did interfere our results to some degree, we could still gain insight into the problem so the data was kept.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <h3>2.Quantitative characterization and target-site modelling</h3>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | In order to build a precisely controlled device, we decided to further characterized the complete-target-sites of 1\2\4 copy number and chose the most suitable one for pathway construction. To begin with we design another orthogonal experiment crossing the two variables, target-site-number N and MiR122 concentration M, with a more precise gradients for MiR122. But soon we found that it would be too labour-costing and decided that a better way was to replace it with 2 dosage-gradient experiments and a mathematic model. （fig.）
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure6.</strong>apoptosis pathway induced by hBax</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <h4>A.Dosage experiment testing performance of 2 copies complete target-site</h4>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | Firstly we fixed the target-site number at 2 and set up a concentration gradient for miR122 expression plasmid(fig. A, plasmid B) to gain insight into its dosage effect. Plasmids A and B were co-transfected using PEI into HEK293 cell line. The gradient were set up from 0 to 0.5ug of plasmid per well. The experiment was done with 2 parallel groups of wells( that is, 6 wells as a group and there were 2 repeats) to leave samples for both Western-Blot and RT-qPCR(since both techniques require destruction of sample). To ensure the parallelity so that the two data can be employed to illustrate the problem together, we had repeated the experiment 2 times till we gained same fluorescence intensity with corresponding wells(data not shown).
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure7.Dosage effect of miR122 on 2 copy number target-site.</strong>(A)Plasmid A produced GFP mRNA with a 2 copies Complete target-site in its 3’ UTR, while plasmid B produced miR122 without making fluorescence noise. (B) A gradient of total plasmid amount per well was set up as shown. A significant positive correlation between knockdown efficiency and plasmid B concentration can be observed.(C) RT-qPCR showed that plasmid B successfully express miR122 in cells, the level of which was in a good linear correlation with the transfection concentration through linear-regression analysis(data not shown).(D).A not-so-successful Western-Blot showing the GFP level in each well. Based on scanning densitometry, the level can be counted(chart ) and plotted as above.</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | knockdown efficiency chart <br />
| |
| - | <p>收样时间：48hr<br />Target-site: Complete 2-copies</p>
| |
| - | <table width="536">
| |
| - | <tr>
| |
| - | <td width="200">Mir122</td>
| |
| - | <td width="50">1</td>
| |
| - | <td width="50">4</td>
| |
| - | <td width="50">10</td>
| |
| - | <td width="50">28</td>
| |
| - | <td width="50">76</td>
| |
| - | <td width="50">161</td>
| |
| - | </tr>
| |
| - | <tr>
| |
| - | <td>GFP(Western Blot)</td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | </tr>
| |
| - | </table>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | The results showed a simple and elegant linear correlation between knockdown efficiency and miR122 concentration. Due to some technical problems with Western-Blot the data from well of 0.5ug plasmid B wasn’t consistent with fluorescence observation, and we have planned to reconfirmed the data.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <h4>B.Performance of complete target-site of different copy number</h4>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | Secondly we fixed the miR122 concentration at 0.75ug to ensure an optimal performance of each targets and let target-site number be the variable this time. Since we had already made sure of the relationship of miR122 level and plasmid concentration, RT-qPCR was no longer needed and so was the parallel groups.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | Apart from the 2 and 4 copy target-site, we have also constructed a mixed-up plasmid with 2 complete target-site followed by 2 CULT target-site(2+2).
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure8.</strong>apoptosis pathway induced by hBax</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | Knock down efficiency chart<br />
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <p>Mir122 concentration:0.75ug=</p>
| |
| - | <table width="536">
| |
| - | <tr>
| |
| - | <td width="200">Target Site Number</td>
| |
| - | <td width="75">0</td>
| |
| - | <td width="75">1</td>
| |
| - | <td width="75">2</td>
| |
| - | <td width="75">4</td>
| |
| - | </tr>
| |
| - | <tr class="first-table-line">
| |
| - | <td>GFP(Western Blot)</td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | <td></td>
| |
| - | </tr>
| |
| - | </table>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | The results show that 4 copy target-site has the most brilliant knock-down efficiency, which is about under such a miR122 level, which conforms to the data given by 2010 Heiderburg using dual-fluorescent system. What’s more, in Part1 we have already proved that 2 copy target-site works better than 1 copy target-site. Finally we decided to first continue further construction of the pathway with the 2 copy target-site, considering that its moderate knockdown efficiency may well coordinate with the other two systems. And if the efficiency turns out improper, we can replace it with other candidates easily with our molecular designing.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <h4>C.Modelling</h4>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | In order to better understand the quality of our miR122-Target system, we have employed interpolation technique with Matlab to model its performance. The modeling can be seen at Modelling module in Results. Also, we have planned a more well-designed experiment to test and characterize all target-sites(in fact, there are 8 of them, produced by permutation and combination of different numbers of complete and CULT). The data derived from that would better support the modeling work.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure8.</strong>apoptosis pathway induced by hBax</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <h2>Simulation testing of Tet-Off system: Controlling panel for iPSC</h2>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | We also used eGFP to test the switching and driving performance of Tet-Off System, which would be a convenient controlling panel to switch pathway state between On and Off and thus provided protection for iPSC. We have collected and constructed three TRE elements of different generations.and thus made a comparison between them.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <div class="figure">
| |
| - | <img class="fig_img" height="300px" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Which_suicide_gene_fig_1.gif" />
| |
| - | <p class="des" style="margin-top:200px;width:300px"><strong>Figure9. Performance of Tet-off system in switching between different state.</strong>Two plasmids(fig.) were co-transfected into Bosc cell line using PEI. The wells with only plasmids B/C or D characterized the basal leaky expression of different pTRE elements, which can be viewed as the first Off-state. The well with both plasmids represents the On-state of the system, and the well further added with dox represents the second Off-state. Dox concentration was chosen according to protocols in order to give a best performance of the system and avoid hazard on cell growth.</p>
| |
| - | <div class="clear"></div></div>
| |
| - |
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | The results showed that pTRE-Tight has the least leaky expression and a good switch response between On and Off state. However, in our experiments leaky expression was too high of pTRE2 and pTRE3G elements, and they cannot response to tTA and DOX properly(data not shown),which confused us a lot since according to protocol from Invitrogen, pTRE3G should have the best performance. We have repeated the experiments several times in troubleshooting, but gained no satisfactory results. So we decided to progress with pTRE-Tight in the first place and leave the other ones as alternative schemes.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| - | <DIV id="references">
| |
| - | <h2>References</h2>
| |
| - | <p><a class="references">[1]</a>Hui Xu etc. Liver-Enriched Transcription Factors Regulate MicroRNA-122 That Targets CUTL1 During Liver Development.</p>
| |
| - | <p><a class="references">[2]</a>Tet-Off and Tet-On Gene Expression Systems User Manual</p>
| |
| | </DIV> | | </DIV> |
| | <!--正 文 部 分 结 束--> | | <!--正 文 部 分 结 束--> |
"
