Team:UNITN-Trento/Notebook/Labposts/06/09
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{ | { | ||
- | "date" : "2013-06- | + | "date" : "2013-06-07", |
- | "author" : " | + | "author" : "gabriele-michele", |
- | "title" : " | + | "title" : "Third SAMsynthetase synthase extraction attempt - TOO SAD", |
- | "content" : " | + | "content" : " We've tried another combination to maximize the outputs of the PCR done to amplify the SAMsynthetase synthase gene from an extract of E.coli genomic DNA (strain MG1655). This time we used the <I> RBC Taq DNA Polymerase </I> protocol but with a mix of this polymerase (0.25 ul) and the Phusion polymerase (0.3 ul). We've prepared two identical samples to see who is the better PCR maker! :) {{:Team:UNITN-Trento/Templates/Styles/Spoiler|Gel Image|<html><img src=\"https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c2/Tn-20130607-SAMsynth_pcr_gire-pedro.jpg\" /></html>}}As you can see from the picture we both obtained great results", |
- | "tags" : " | + | "tags" : "SAMsynthetase" |
} | } |
Latest revision as of 09:36, 3 October 2013
{ "date" : "2013-06-07", "author" : "gabriele-michele", "title" : "Third SAMsynthetase synthase extraction attempt - TOO SAD", "content" : " We've tried another combination to maximize the outputs of the PCR done to amplify the SAMsynthetase synthase gene from an extract of E.coli genomic DNA (strain MG1655). This time we used the RBC Taq DNA Polymerase protocol but with a mix of this polymerase (0.25 ul) and the Phusion polymerase (0.3 ul). We've prepared two identical samples to see who is the better PCR maker! :)
As you can see from the picture we both obtained great results", "tags" : "SAMsynthetase" }