Team:Kyoto/Humanpractice/Data

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Data)
 
(162 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
=Data=
+
{{Template:Kyoto/header}}
 +
<div id="kyoto-main">
 +
<div class="texts">
 +
<div id="ankeito">
 +
===Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?===
 +
<br>
 +
[Yes / No]<br><br><br>
 +
<p style="font-size:10px">
 +
[[File:Q1 generation.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig1.A(10~19 N=92 20~29 N=68 30~39 N=26 40~59 N=32 60~=33)<br>
 +
Comparison by generation.<br>
 +
The number of 20s to 50s people who chose yes is larger than that of other generation.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
-
アンケートは選択肢形式にし、質問の初めに性別、出身国、年齢、宗教、職業を応えてもらい、それぞれの要素が回答にどのように影響してくるのかを調べた。また、外国人へのアンケートは、現地で実際に取ったほか、京都に来ている観光客からも集めた。(どこでやったか書く)
+
[[ File:Q1 male vs female.jpg]]<br>
-
アンケートは以下のものを使用した。<br><br>
+
Fig2.(male=111 female=141)<br>
-
'''Questionnaire!!!!'''<br>
+
A comparison between male and female.<br>
-
Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?<br>
+
There does not seem to be much difference.<br>
-
1 Yes
+
<br><br><br>
-
2 No<br>
+
-
+
-
Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible?  Please give X as many as you think it is permissible. <br>
+
-
1 check
+
-
2 no check<br>
+
-
Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease. <br>
+
-
Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br>
+
-
Q2.3 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can save people in disease.<br>
+
-
Q2.4 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can save people in disease. <br>
+
-
Q2.5 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.<br>
+
-
Q2.6 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.<br>
+
-
Q2.7 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can improve our life.<br>
+
-
Q2.8 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can improve our life.<br>
+
-
Q2.9 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.<br>
+
-
Q2.10 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.<br>
+
-
Q2.11 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can advance science.<br>
+
-
Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.<br>
+
-
+
-
+
-
Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?<br>
+
-
1 I know well.
+
-
2 I know only its name.
+
-
3 I do not know at all.<br>
+
-
Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?<br>
+
-
1 Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene.
+
-
2 Partly yes, some can be but others are not.
+
-
3 No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.<br>
+
-
+
-
+
-
Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible. <br>
+
-
1 check
+
-
2 no check<br>
+
-
Q5.1 Bacteria  Q5.2 wheat Q5.3 honeybee Q5.4 killifish  Q5.5 frog
+
-
Q5.6 chickens  Q5.7 mouse Q5.8 dog Q5.9 monkey Q5.10 human beings<br><br><br>
+
 +
[[File:Q1 Religion.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig3.(Believe particular religion N=126 Not believe particular religion N=126)<br>
 +
A comparison between people who have specific religion and people who do not.<br>
 +
There does not seem to be much difference.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
-
(各設問のグラフ記載)<br>
+
===Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible?  Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.===
-
Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?<br>
+
<br>  
-
1Yes  2No<br><br><br>
+
[Check / No Check]<br><br>
-
 
+
-
+
-
この図は年齢別に比較したものだ<br>
+
-
30代から50代は、生物実験を考えたことがある人が多い。<br>
+
-
その他の年齢の人に関しては、それを考えたことがある人とない人はおよそ同数であった。<br><br><br>
+
-
 
+
-
+
-
この図は、性別で比較したものだ<br>
+
-
性別での違いは見られない。<br><br>
+
-
+
-
この図は宗教の有無で比べたものだ<br>
+
-
宗教の有無での差は、あまり見られない。<br><br>
+
-
 
+
-
Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible?  Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.<br>  
+
-
1 check<br>
+
-
2 no check<br>
+
Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br>  
Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br>  
Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br>
Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br>
Line 75: Line 43:
Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.<br><br>
Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.<br><br>
-
syuukei2Q2<br>
 
-
この図は特定の宗教を信仰しているかで比較したもの<br>
 
-
特定の宗教を信仰していないほうが、動物実験を許す人がどの問いに対してもわずかに多い<br><br><br>
 
-
 
-
この図は学生と他で比較したもの<br>
 
-
学生は他の職業に比べ、動物実験を許す人が多い<br>
 
-
 
-
この図は年齢で比べたものだ。<br>
+
[[File:Q2 Religionist vs Irreligionist.jpg]]<br>
-
20代はほかの年齢のひとより生物実験を許すひとが多い<br><br><br>
+
<p style="font-size:10px">Fig4.(Believe particular religion N=126 Not believe particular religion N=126)<br>
-
+
A comparison between people who have specific religion and people who do not.<br>
 +
People who do not have specific religion permit using living things for experiments than people who have specific religion.
 +
<br>
-
この図は性別で比べたもの。<br>
 
-
男性の方が女性より生物実験を許す人が多い<br><br><br>
 
-
 
-
この図はQ1でYesと答えた人とNoと答えた人で比較したもの。<br>
 
-
違いはほとんど見られない。<br><br><br><br>
 
 +
[[File:Q2 generetion.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig5.(10~19 N=92 20~29 N=68 30~49 N=45 50~ N=46)<br>
 +
A comparison by generation.<br>
 +
20s permit using living things for experiments than other generation.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
-
Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?<br>
+
[[File:Q2 male vs female.jpg]]<br>
-
1 I know well.<br>
+
Fig6.(male N=111 female N=141)<br>
-
2 I know only its name.<br>
+
A comparison between male and female.<br>
-
3 I do not know at all.<br><br><br><br><br><br>
+
Male permit using living things for experiments than female.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
 +
[[File:Q2 yes vs no(Q1).jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig7.(Q1 yes N=135 Q1 no N=117)
 +
A comparison between people who answered YES at Q1 and who answered NO.<br>
 +
There doesn't seem to be any difference.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
===Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?===
 +
<br>
 +
[ I know well./
 +
I know only its name./
 +
I do not know at all.]<br><br><br>
 +
[[File:Q3 male vs female.jpg]]<br>
 +
<p style="font-size:10px">Fig8.(male N=173 female N=210)<br>
 +
A comparison between male and female<br>
 +
The propotion of males who answered "I kwow" about genetically modification (GM) is higher than that of females.<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
-
+
===Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?===
-
+
<br>
-
これらの図は男女で比べたもの。<br>
+
[Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene./
-
遺伝子組み換えに関しては男性のほうが女性より知識があるとわかる。<br>
+
Partly yes, some can be but others are not./
-
Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?<br>
+
No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.]<br><br><br>
-
1 Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene.<br>
+
-
2 Partly yes, some can be but others are not.<br>
+
-
3 No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.<br><br><br><br>
+
 +
[[File:Q4 male vs female.jpg]]<br>
 +
<p style="font-size:10px">Fig9.(male N=204 female N=227)<br>
 +
[[File:Q4 religion(chi-square).jpg|530px|320px]][[File:Q4 religion.jpg|550px|340px]]<br>
 +
Fig10.(Belive particular religion N=242 Not believe particular religion N=189)<br>
 +
[[File:Q4 religion.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig11.(Yes N=72 Partly yes N=217 no N=142)<br>
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
</p>
 +
===Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.===
 +
<br>
 +
[Check/
 +
No Check]<br>
 +
Q5.1 Bacteria  Q5.2 Wheat Q5.3 Honeybee Q5.4 Killifish  Q5.5 Frog<br>
 +
Q5.6 Chickens  Q5.7 Mouse Q5.8 Dog Q5.9 Monkey Q5.10 Human beings<br><br><br>
-
Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.<br>
+
<p style="font-size:10px">
-
1 check<br>
+
[[File:Q5 religion(chi-square).jpg]]<br>
-
2 no check<br>
+
Fig12.(Chiristian N=71 Buddist N=105 Irreligionist N=189)<br>
-
Q5.1 Bacteria  Q5.2 wheat Q5.3 honeybee Q5.4 killifish  Q5.5 frog
+
The graph shows the difference according to religion.<br>
-
Q5.6 chickens  Q5.7 mouse Q5.8 dog Q5.9 monkey Q5.10 human beings<br><br><br>
+
The graph of Buddhist is almost the same with that of Irreligionist, which shows that the higher the animals are, the less people who thinks their genes can be modified.
 +
From honey bee to human beings,Christian who thinks genetically modification is permitted takes up about 15%.<br>
   
   
 +
[[File:Q5 Asia vs Europe.jpg]]<br>
 +
Fig13.(Asia N=332 Europe N=82)<br>
 +
A comparison between Asian and Europe.<br>
 +
The graph is similar with the one which compares between religions. The graph of Asian is similar to that of Buddhist and Irreligionist, while the graph of Europe is similar to that of Christian.<br>
-
この図は宗教別に比較したもの。<br>
+
[[File:Q5 Asia male vs female.jpg]]<br>
-
宗教によってグラフの概形が異なる。<br>
+
Fig14.(male N=150 female N=166)<br>
-
BuddhistとIrreligionistはだいたい同じグラフで、種が高等になるにつれ遺伝子組み換えを許すと答える人が少なくなるのに比べ、Christianはhoneybeeからhuman beingsまで遺伝子組み換えを許すと答える人の割合は15%前後であった。<br><br>
+
A comparison between male and female in Asia.<br>
-
+
This graph shows the difference between male and female from Asia.
 +
The number of males who allow genetically modification is larger than that of females.<br>
-
この図はAsiaとEuropeで比較したもの<br>
+
[[File:Europe male vs female.jpg]]<br>
-
宗教別に比較したときと似た形になり、AsiaはBuddhistとIrreligionistのグラフと同じ形で、EuropeはChristianと同じ形だ<br><br><br>
+
Fig15.(male N=30 female N=44)<br>
-
+
A comparison between male and female in Europe.<br>
 +
The number of males who answered that genetically modification is admitted in E. coli and mice is larger than that of females. About other living things, there is no difference between male and female.<br>
-
この図はアジアの男女で比較したもの<br>
+
<br><br><br>
-
男性の方が女性より遺伝子組み換えを許す人が多い。<br><br><br>
+
</p>
-
+
-
この図はヨーロッパの男女で比べたもの。<br>
+
===Result===
-
男性のほうが大腸菌とマウスを遺伝子組み換えをすることが許されると答えた人が女性より多かったがその他はあまり違いはない。<br><br><br><br><br><br>
+
<br>
 +
Q1.When we see fig2 and fig3 there doesn't seem any difference.
 +
When we see fig1 the number of 20s to 50s people who chose yes is larger than that of other generation.
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
Q2.The standard of the answer to this question is whether the answer places an importance on the profit they may gain through animal experiments, or the agony the animals feel through these experiments.
 +
We asked whether animal experiments can be allowed from three points, “saving human beings”, “useful to our life”, “contribution to the development of science”
 +
As a result, people who answered that animal experiment can be performed if it is for saving human beings was obviously larger than the other two points.
 +
As for the difference by sex, male seems to be more generous to animal experiment, and place an importance on the profit of the human beings while female seem to place an importance on the animals’ pain. 
 +
When we compared by a religion or generation, there seemed to be no significant difference.
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
Q5.Significant difference is observed by different sex, region and religion.
-
(各設問のコメント記載)<br>
+
In terms of sex, males tend to permit genetically modification than females.
-
(まとめ)<br>
+
-
Q1<br>
+
-
性別、職業で比較しても、目立った違いは見られなかった。<br>
+
-
年齢で比較したところ、30代から60代の年齢層でyesの割合が高くなった。<br><br>
+
-
Q2<br>
+
In terms of region, half of people in Asia answered that they admit using living things such as E. coli and wheat for experiments. About 35% of them permit using mice and 20% permit using dogs and monkeys. On the other hand, many people in Europe admit using E. coli and wheat. However, no more than 15% of them permit using other living things.
-
Q2では”人命を救う”、”生活の役に立つ”、”科学の発展に寄与する”の3つの目的について、動物実験が許されるかを聞いた。その結果、人命を救うための動物実験はほかの二つの目的で行われる動物実験より許されると答えた人が明らかに多かった。<br>
+
 
-
性別差については、男性の方が生物実験を認める人が多いことがわかるが、職業、年齢で比較すると、目立った違いは見られなかった。<br>
+
In terms of religion, about 50% of Buddhist and Irreligionist answerer permit using E. coli and wheat. The more complicate structures of subjects are, the less people admit. Christian answerer admit rate using E. coli and wheat is also higher than other alternatives rate, which is about 15%.
-
とりわけ、Q1の”生物を使う実験について考えたことがあるか否か”で比較すると、ほとんど違いがみられなかった。<br><br> 
+
-
Q5<br>
 
-
性別、地域、宗教別にみた結果に大きな差が認められる。<br>
 
-
 性別差を見ると、男性の方が、女性より遺伝子組み換えを認めている。<br>
 
-
  地域差を見ると、アジア圏の人々が、大腸菌や小麦といった生物に対する実験に約50%の人が許容すると答えており、ネズミは約35%、犬、猿は約20%近くが許容している。比較して、ヨーロッパ圏の人々の答えは、大腸菌と小麦はやはり高めだが、その他全ての動物が約15%の許容をしている。(ここまで別リンク)<br><br><br><br>
 
Line 162: Line 162:
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
 +
{{Kyoto/import|pagename={{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Template:Kyoto/footer}}
{{Template:Kyoto/footer}}

Latest revision as of 03:55, 28 September 2013

count down

Contents

Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?


[Yes / No]


Q1 generation.jpg
Fig1.A(10~19 N=92 20~29 N=68 30~39 N=26 40~59 N=32 60~=33)
Comparison by generation.
The number of 20s to 50s people who chose yes is larger than that of other generation.



Q1 male vs female.jpg
Fig2.(male=111 female=141)
A comparison between male and female.
There does not seem to be much difference.



Q1 Religion.jpg
Fig3.(Believe particular religion N=126 Not believe particular religion N=126)
A comparison between people who have specific religion and people who do not.
There does not seem to be much difference.



Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.


[Check / No Check]

Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.
Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.
Q2.3 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can save people in disease.
Q2.4 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can save people in disease.
Q2.5 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.
Q2.6 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.
Q2.7 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can improve our life.
Q2.8 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can improve our life.
Q2.9 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.
Q2.10 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.
Q2.11 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can advance science.
Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.


Q2 Religionist vs Irreligionist.jpg

Fig4.(Believe particular religion N=126 Not believe particular religion N=126)
A comparison between people who have specific religion and people who do not.
People who do not have specific religion permit using living things for experiments than people who have specific religion.
Q2 generetion.jpg
Fig5.(10~19 N=92 20~29 N=68 30~49 N=45 50~ N=46)
A comparison by generation.
20s permit using living things for experiments than other generation.



Q2 male vs female.jpg
Fig6.(male N=111 female N=141)
A comparison between male and female.
Male permit using living things for experiments than female.



Q2 yes vs no(Q1).jpg
Fig7.(Q1 yes N=135 Q1 no N=117) A comparison between people who answered YES at Q1 and who answered NO.
There doesn't seem to be any difference.



Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?


[ I know well./ I know only its name./ I do not know at all.]


Q3 male vs female.jpg

Fig8.(male N=173 female N=210)
A comparison between male and female
The propotion of males who answered "I kwow" about genetically modification (GM) is higher than that of females.



Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?


[Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene./ Partly yes, some can be but others are not./ No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.]


Q4 male vs female.jpg

Fig9.(male N=204 female N=227)
Q4 religion(chi-square).jpgQ4 religion.jpg
Fig10.(Belive particular religion N=242 Not believe particular religion N=189)
Q4 religion.jpg
Fig11.(Yes N=72 Partly yes N=217 no N=142)



Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.


[Check/ No Check]
Q5.1 Bacteria  Q5.2 Wheat Q5.3 Honeybee Q5.4 Killifish  Q5.5 Frog
Q5.6 Chickens  Q5.7 Mouse Q5.8 Dog Q5.9 Monkey Q5.10 Human beings


Q5 religion(chi-square).jpg
Fig12.(Chiristian N=71 Buddist N=105 Irreligionist N=189)
The graph shows the difference according to religion.
The graph of Buddhist is almost the same with that of Irreligionist, which shows that the higher the animals are, the less people who thinks their genes can be modified. From honey bee to human beings,Christian who thinks genetically modification is permitted takes up about 15%.
Q5 Asia vs Europe.jpg
Fig13.(Asia N=332 Europe N=82)
A comparison between Asian and Europe.
The graph is similar with the one which compares between religions. The graph of Asian is similar to that of Buddhist and Irreligionist, while the graph of Europe is similar to that of Christian.
Q5 Asia male vs female.jpg
Fig14.(male N=150 female N=166)
A comparison between male and female in Asia.
This graph shows the difference between male and female from Asia. The number of males who allow genetically modification is larger than that of females.
Europe male vs female.jpg
Fig15.(male N=30 female N=44)
A comparison between male and female in Europe.
The number of males who answered that genetically modification is admitted in E. coli and mice is larger than that of females. About other living things, there is no difference between male and female.



Result


Q1.When we see fig2 and fig3 there doesn't seem any difference. When we see fig1 the number of 20s to 50s people who chose yes is larger than that of other generation.


Q2.The standard of the answer to this question is whether the answer places an importance on the profit they may gain through animal experiments, or the agony the animals feel through these experiments.

We asked whether animal experiments can be allowed from three points, “saving human beings”, “useful to our life”, “contribution to the development of science”

As a result, people who answered that animal experiment can be performed if it is for saving human beings was obviously larger than the other two points.

As for the difference by sex, male seems to be more generous to animal experiment, and place an importance on the profit of the human beings while female seem to place an importance on the animals’ pain.

When we compared by a religion or generation, there seemed to be no significant difference.


Q5.Significant difference is observed by different sex, region and religion.

In terms of sex, males tend to permit genetically modification than females.

In terms of region, half of people in Asia answered that they admit using living things such as E. coli and wheat for experiments. About 35% of them permit using mice and 20% permit using dogs and monkeys. On the other hand, many people in Europe admit using E. coli and wheat. However, no more than 15% of them permit using other living things.

In terms of religion, about 50% of Buddhist and Irreligionist answerer permit using E. coli and wheat. The more complicate structures of subjects are, the less people admit. Christian answerer admit rate using E. coli and wheat is also higher than other alternatives rate, which is about 15%.