Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/light
From 2013.igem.org
(35 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<style type ='text/css'> | <style type ='text/css'> | ||
+ | |||
+ | #contents2 { | ||
+ | position: relative; | ||
+ | width: 100px; | ||
+ | top: 340px; | ||
+ | left: 220px; | ||
+ | |||
+ | } | ||
#globalWrapper { | #globalWrapper { | ||
width: 1410px; | width: 1410px; | ||
Line 351: | Line 359: | ||
float: left; | float: left; | ||
width:490px; | width:490px; | ||
- | height: | + | height:9100px; |
background: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d6/Header_index_kiso5.png") 0px -250px no-repeat ; | background: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d6/Header_index_kiso5.png") 0px -250px no-repeat ; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 380: | Line 388: | ||
float: left; | float: left; | ||
width:820px; | width:820px; | ||
- | height: | + | height:9100px; |
background: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d6/Header_index_kiso5.png") -490px -250px no-repeat; | background: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d6/Header_index_kiso5.png") -490px -250px no-repeat; | ||
Line 388: | Line 396: | ||
float: left; | float: left; | ||
width: 100px; | width: 100px; | ||
- | height: | + | height: 9100px; |
background: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d6/Header_index_kiso5.png") -1310px -250px no-repeat; | background: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d6/Header_index_kiso5.png") -1310px -250px no-repeat; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 395: | Line 403: | ||
clear: both; | clear: both; | ||
width: 1410px; | width: 1410px; | ||
- | height: | + | height: 900px; |
background: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d6/Header_index_kiso5.png") 0px -9300px no-repeat; | background: url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d6/Header_index_kiso5.png") 0px -9300px no-repeat; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 525: | Line 533: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <ul id="contents2"> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/oscillator"><li>RNA oscillator</li></a> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/scaffold"><li>RNAScaffold</li></a> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/light"><li>Light sensor</li></a> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/modeling"><li>Modeling</li></a> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Tokyo-NoKoGen/rhodopsin"><li>Improving a BioBrick part - Rhodopsin</li></a> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 530: | Line 546: | ||
<div id="main"> | <div id="main"> | ||
+ | <font size=5> | ||
+ | |||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | <p align=center><font size=7><strong> | + | <p align=center><font size=7><strong>Light sensor</strong></font></p> |
- | + | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
+ | <hr> | ||
+ | <hr size="3" width="(60%)" align="left"noshade> | ||
+ | </hr> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | <font size= | + | <font size=6 id="Introduction"><strong>Introduction</strong></font> |
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<h3>1. YF1/ FixJ</h3> | <h3>1. YF1/ FixJ</h3> | ||
- | <BR> | + | |
- | YF1/ FixJ system is blue light (480 nm) sensing system. YF1 is a fusion protein, heme-binding PAS sensor domain of FixL from Bradyrhizobium japonicum(FixL) and the LOV blue light sensor domain of Bacillus subtilis YtvA(YtvA). The Histidine kinase YF1 employs a light-oxygen-voltage, blue light photosensor domain. FixJ is YF1’s cognate response regulator. In the absence of blue light, YF1 phosphorylates FixJ, and phosphorylated FixJ drives robust gene expression from the FixK2 promoter(Ref. 1,2,3). | + | <BR><BR> |
- | <BR> | + | |
- | <BR> | + | <p style="line-height:110%"> |
+ | YF1/ FixJ system is a blue light (480 nm) sensing system. YF1 is a fusion protein, heme-binding PAS sensor domain of FixL from <I>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</I>(FixL) and the LOV blue light sensor domain of <I>Bacillus subtilis</I> YtvA(YtvA). The Histidine kinase YF1 employs a light-oxygen-voltage, blue light photosensor domain. FixJ is YF1’s cognate response regulator. In the absence of blue light, YF1 phosphorylates FixJ, and phosphorylated FixJ drives robust gene expression from the FixK2 promoter(Ref. 1,2,3). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR> | ||
+ | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/8/88/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A316.PNG> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
<h3>2. Rhodopsin</h3> | <h3>2. Rhodopsin</h3> | ||
- | <BR> | + | |
- | Halophilic archaea, such as Halobacterium salinarum and Natronobacterium pharaonis (N. pharaonis) show phototaxis by responding to changes in light color and intensity using receptors called sensory rhodopsin I and II (SRI and SRII). The SR proteins are seven-transmembrane retinylidene photoreceptors, which transmits blue light signal (λmax 487 nm) to their corresponding transducers HtrI and HtrII respectively. signals to Htr proteins via helix-helix interaction. Htr protein consists of two transmembrane helices and a cytoplasmic methyl-accepting and His-Kinase domain, and belongs to histidine kinase / phosphoreregulator two-component system for regulating cells’ flagellar motors for phototaxis (Ref. 4,5). | + | <BR><BR> |
+ | |||
+ | <p style="line-height:110%"> | ||
+ | Halophilic archaea, such as <I>Halobacterium salinarum</I> and<I> Natronobacterium pharaonis (N. pharaonis)</I> show phototaxis by responding to changes in light color and intensity using receptors called sensory rhodopsin I and II (SRI and SRII). The SR proteins are seven-transmembrane retinylidene photoreceptors, which transmits blue light signal (λmax 487 nm) to their corresponding transducers HtrI and HtrII respectively. signals to Htr proteins via helix-helix interaction. Htr protein consists of two transmembrane helices and a cytoplasmic methyl-accepting and His-Kinase domain, and belongs to histidine kinase / phosphoreregulator two-component system for regulating cells’ flagellar motors for phototaxis (Ref. 4,5). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | <BR> | + | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/39/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A317.PNG> |
- | <font size= | + | |
- | <BR> | + | <BR><BR> |
+ | |||
+ | <BR><p style="line-height:110%"> | ||
+ | <font size=6 id="Objective"><strong>Objective</strong></font> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
Reguration of taRNA expression by light sensor protein<BR> | Reguration of taRNA expression by light sensor protein<BR> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | <font size= | + | <font size=6 id="Method"><strong>Method</strong></font> |
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <font size=5 id="-Design"><strong>-Design</strong></font> | ||
+ | |||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | < | + | <p style="line-height:110%"> |
+ | We construct HHRs containing RBS downstream of the P<sub>const</sub> promoter (low), and taRNA which binds HHR and inactivates HHR’s self-cleaving activity is placed downstream of P<sub>ompC</sub> or P<sub>fixk2</sub> promoter. Under dark condition, taRNA is expressed and inactivates HHR’s self-cleaving activity. On the other hand, under blue light condition, taRNA isn’t expressed and HHR self-cleaves. Becouse of HHR self-cleaving, GFP’s RBS is exposed and GFP is expressed. <BR> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | |||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | <font size= | + | <font size=5 id="-Parts construction"><strong>-Parts construction</strong></font> |
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | 1. YF1/ FixJ<BR> | + | <BR> |
- | 1.) BioBrick part BBa_K1053210 (Tokyo-NoKoGen2013) is fused with HHR connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053004(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) or HHR* connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053005(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) by using Overlap PCR. <BR> | + | <p style="line-height:110%"> |
- | 2.) The PCR products were gel purified and digested with | + | 1. YF1/ FixJ |
- | 3.) Constructed plasmids were transformed into E.coli DH5α.<BR> | + | |
+ | <BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1.) BioBrick part BBa_K1053210 (Tokyo-NoKoGen2013) is fused with HHR connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053004(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) or HHR* connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053005(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) by using Overlap PCR. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2.) The PCR products were gel purified and digested with <I>Xba</I>Ⅰ and <I>Pst</I>Ⅰ. The digested products were ligated into pSB1A3 vector.(Fig. 1)<BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3.) Constructed plasmids were transformed into <I>E.coli</I> DH5α. | ||
+ | </P> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
<img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/29/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A33.PNG> | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/29/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A33.PNG> | ||
- | <BR>Fig. 1 pSB1A3 – | + | <BR>Fig. 1 pSB1A3 – P<sub>const.</sub> – YF1/FixJ - P<sub>fixk2</sub> – TR(12)- HHR - GFP - DT<BR><BR><BR><BR> |
<img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/51/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A34.PNG><BR> | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/51/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A34.PNG><BR> | ||
- | Fig. 2 pSB1A3- | + | Fig. 2 pSB1A3- P<sub>const.</sub> – YF1/FixJ - P<sub>fixk2</sub> – TR(12)- HHR - GFP - DT |
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | 2. Rhodopsin<BR> | + | <p style="line-height:110%"> |
- | 1.) BioBrick part BBa_K769003 (Tokyo-NoKoGen2012) which consists of a chimeric sensory rhodopsin and its cognate transducer from N. pharaonis and the histidine kinase domain of EnvZ from E. coli, that is fused with HHR connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053004(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) or HHR* connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053005(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) by using Overlap PCR. <BR> | + | 2. Rhodopsin |
- | 2.) The PCR products were gel purified and digested with | + | |
- | 3.) Constructed plasmids were transformed into E.coli DH5α.<BR> | + | <BR><BR> |
+ | |||
+ | 1.) BioBrick part BBa_K769003 (Tokyo-NoKoGen2012) which consists of a chimeric sensory rhodopsin and its cognate transducer from <I>N. pharaonis</I> and the histidine kinase domain of EnvZ from <I>E. coli</I>, that is fused with HHR connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053004(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) or HHR* connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053005(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) by using Overlap PCR. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2.) The PCR products were gel purified and digested with <I>Eco</I>RⅠ and <I>Pst</I>Ⅰ. The digested products were ligated into pSB1A3 vector.(Fig. 3) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3.) Constructed plasmids were transformed into <I>E.coli</I> DH5α. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR><BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
<img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e0/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A37.PNG><BR> | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e0/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A37.PNG><BR> | ||
- | Fig.3 pSB1A3 - | + | Fig.3 pSB1A3 - P<sub>const.</sub> - SRⅡ- HtrⅡ- EnvZ - P<sub>ompC</sub> - HHR - GFP - DT<BR><BR><BR><BR> |
<img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/35/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A38.PNG><BR> | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/35/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A38.PNG><BR> | ||
- | Fig.4 pSB1A3 - | + | Fig.4 pSB1A3 - P<sub>const.</sub> - SRⅡ- HtrⅡ- EnvZ - P<sub>ompC</sub> - HHR* - GFP - DT<BR><BR><BR><BR> |
- | + | </p> | |
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | <font size= | + | <font size=6 id="-Evaluation"><strong>Evaluation</strong></font> |
- | <BR> | + | |
+ | <BR><BR><BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p style="line-height:110%"> | ||
YF1/ FixJ<BR> | YF1/ FixJ<BR> | ||
- | 1.) Construct made in –Parts construction- was used to transform into E.coli | + | 1.) Construct made in –Parts construction- was used to transform into <I>E.coli</I> DH5α. |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<BR><BR><BR> | <BR><BR><BR> | ||
- | < | + | |
+ | 2.) The transformants were pre-cultured in 3 mL LB medium overnight at 37 degrees celsius, under dark condition. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <BR><BR><BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3.) 450 μL of pre-cultures were inoculated into 3 mL LB medium inside and incubated either under dark or blue light conditions. OD595 and GFP fluorescence intensity were measured at certain time.(Fig. 1)<BR><BR><BR> | ||
+ | 4.) We evaluated P<sub>const.</sub> – taR12- P<sub>const.</sub> (low) – YF1/ FixJ – P<sub>fixk2</sub> – HHR(Fig. 6).<BR><BR> | ||
+ | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/37/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A313.PNG><BR> | ||
+ | Fig. 6 P<sub>const.</sub> – taR12- P<sub>const.</sub> (low) – YF1/ FixJ – P<sub>fixk2</sub> - HHR<BR><BR> | ||
+ | <p style="line-height:110%"> | ||
+ | We estimate in light GFP is expressed by HHR’s self cleavage and in dark GFP isn’t expressed by taRNA’s expression. If HHR’s active site is mutated, GFP isn’t expressed. | ||
+ | The GFP fluorescence intensity was taken after main culture for 12 h by Plate Reader in this evaluation method.<BR> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
+ | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e8/Parts.jpg> | ||
+ | <BR><BR><BR> | ||
+ | <font size=5 id="Result"><strong>Result</strong></font> | ||
+ | <BR><BR> | ||
+ | <p style="line-height:110%"> | ||
There is no clear difference of light and dark condition of HHR-GFPuv or HHR*-GFPuv.<BR> | There is no clear difference of light and dark condition of HHR-GFPuv or HHR*-GFPuv.<BR> | ||
- | The cause of this result is that excitation light of GFP and | + | The cause of this result is that excitation light of GFP and YF1 is almost the same.<BR> |
+ | </p> | ||
<img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b5/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A39.PNG> | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b5/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A39.PNG> | ||
- | <BR> | + | |
- | Result 1 Evaluation of transformed E.coli under the light or dark condition. | + | <BR><BR> |
+ | |||
+ | Result 1 Evaluation of transformed <I>E.coli</I> under the light or dark condition. | ||
<BR><BR> | <BR><BR> | ||
- | |||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/ | + | <p style="line-height:110%"> |
- | + | If HHR’s active site isn’t mutated difference between in light or dark is observed. This result is suggested that in light taRNA is expressed and HHR’s auto cleavage is inhibited.<BR> | |
+ | RNA oscillator’s result is difference between taRNA’s existence or absence isn’t observed. We think that this difference is caused by difference between P<sub>const.</sub>(low) and P<sub>bad.</sub><BR> | ||
+ | </P> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c8/%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A3%E3%83%97%E3%83%81%E3%83%A310.PNG> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
<BR><BR> | <BR><BR> | ||
- | + | ||
- | Result 2 Evaluation of transformed E. coli under the light or dark condition. | + | Result 2 Evaluation of transformed <I>E. coli</I> under the light or dark condition. |
<BR><BR><BR> | <BR><BR><BR> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<BR><BR><BR><BR> | <BR><BR><BR><BR> | ||
- | <font size= | + | <font size=6 id="Future work"><strong>Future work</strong></font> |
<BR> | <BR> | ||
- | We want to evaluate | + | <p style="line-height:110%"> |
- | We want to synchronize oscillation cycle with Twinkle.coli by light sensor protein in the future.<BR> | + | We want to evaluate P<sub>const.</sub> - Yf1/FixJ - P<sub>fixk2</sub>- TR(12)- HHR- GFP- DT and P<sub>fixk2</sub> - taR12 - P<sub>const.</sub>(low) TR(12)- HHR- GFP- P<sub>const.</sub>- YF1/ FixJ by changing main culture time and changing evaluation method again.<BR> |
- | + | We want to synchronize oscillation cycle with <I>Twinkle. coli</I> by light sensor protein in the future.<BR> | |
+ | </p> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
<BR> | <BR> | ||
+ | <p style="line-height:110%"> | ||
Reference<BR> | Reference<BR> | ||
- | [1] J. Mol. Biol.(2009) 385, 1433-1444<BR> | + | [1] <I>J. Mol. Biol.</I>(2009) 385, 1433-1444<BR> |
- | [2] J. Mol. Biol. (2012) 416, 534-542<BR> | + | [2] <I>J. Mol. Biol. </I>(2012) 416, 534-542<BR> |
- | [3] Bacteriology (1998) 180, 5251-5255<BR> | + | [3] <I>Bacteriology </I>(1998) 180, 5251-5255<BR> |
- | [4] Xue-Nong Zhang et al. (1999) The specificity of interaction of archaeal transducers with their cognate sensory rhodopsins is determined by their transmembrane helices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA <BR> | + | [4] Xue-Nong Zhang <I>et al.</I> (1999) The specificity of interaction of archaeal transducers with their cognate sensory rhodopsins is determined by their transmembrane helices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA <BR> |
- | [5] Wouter D. Hoff et al. (1997) Molecular mechanism of photosignaling by archaeal sensory rhodopsin, Anmu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.<BR> | + | [5] Wouter D. Hoff <I>et al.</I> (1997) Molecular mechanism of photosignaling by archaeal sensory rhodopsin, Anmu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.<BR> |
- | + | ||
+ | </p></font> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:02, 28 September 2013
Light sensor
Introduction
1. YF1/ FixJ
YF1/ FixJ system is a blue light (480 nm) sensing system. YF1 is a fusion protein, heme-binding PAS sensor domain of FixL from Bradyrhizobium japonicum(FixL) and the LOV blue light sensor domain of Bacillus subtilis YtvA(YtvA). The Histidine kinase YF1 employs a light-oxygen-voltage, blue light photosensor domain. FixJ is YF1’s cognate response regulator. In the absence of blue light, YF1 phosphorylates FixJ, and phosphorylated FixJ drives robust gene expression from the FixK2 promoter(Ref. 1,2,3).
2. Rhodopsin
Halophilic archaea, such as Halobacterium salinarum and Natronobacterium pharaonis (N. pharaonis) show phototaxis by responding to changes in light color and intensity using receptors called sensory rhodopsin I and II (SRI and SRII). The SR proteins are seven-transmembrane retinylidene photoreceptors, which transmits blue light signal (λmax 487 nm) to their corresponding transducers HtrI and HtrII respectively. signals to Htr proteins via helix-helix interaction. Htr protein consists of two transmembrane helices and a cytoplasmic methyl-accepting and His-Kinase domain, and belongs to histidine kinase / phosphoreregulator two-component system for regulating cells’ flagellar motors for phototaxis (Ref. 4,5).
Objective
Reguration of taRNA expression by light sensor protein
Method
-Design
We construct HHRs containing RBS downstream of the Pconst promoter (low), and taRNA which binds HHR and inactivates HHR’s self-cleaving activity is placed downstream of PompC or Pfixk2 promoter. Under dark condition, taRNA is expressed and inactivates HHR’s self-cleaving activity. On the other hand, under blue light condition, taRNA isn’t expressed and HHR self-cleaves. Becouse of HHR self-cleaving, GFP’s RBS is exposed and GFP is expressed.
-Parts construction
1. YF1/ FixJ
1.) BioBrick part BBa_K1053210 (Tokyo-NoKoGen2013) is fused with HHR connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053004(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) or HHR* connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053005(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) by using Overlap PCR.
2.) The PCR products were gel purified and digested with XbaⅠ and PstⅠ. The digested products were ligated into pSB1A3 vector.(Fig. 1)
3.) Constructed plasmids were transformed into E.coli DH5α.
Fig. 1 pSB1A3 – Pconst. – YF1/FixJ - Pfixk2 – TR(12)- HHR - GFP - DT
Fig. 2 pSB1A3- Pconst. – YF1/FixJ - Pfixk2 – TR(12)- HHR - GFP - DT
2. Rhodopsin
1.) BioBrick part BBa_K769003 (Tokyo-NoKoGen2012) which consists of a chimeric sensory rhodopsin and its cognate transducer from N. pharaonis and the histidine kinase domain of EnvZ from E. coli, that is fused with HHR connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053004(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) or HHR* connecting with GFP (BBa_K1053005(Tokyo-NoKoGen2013)) by using Overlap PCR.
2.) The PCR products were gel purified and digested with EcoRⅠ and PstⅠ. The digested products were ligated into pSB1A3 vector.(Fig. 3)
3.) Constructed plasmids were transformed into E.coli DH5α.
Fig.3 pSB1A3 - Pconst. - SRⅡ- HtrⅡ- EnvZ - PompC - HHR - GFP - DT
Fig.4 pSB1A3 - Pconst. - SRⅡ- HtrⅡ- EnvZ - PompC - HHR* - GFP - DT
Evaluation
YF1/ FixJ
1.) Construct made in –Parts construction- was used to transform into E.coli DH5α.
2.) The transformants were pre-cultured in 3 mL LB medium overnight at 37 degrees celsius, under dark condition.
3.) 450 μL of pre-cultures were inoculated into 3 mL LB medium inside and incubated either under dark or blue light conditions. OD595 and GFP fluorescence intensity were measured at certain time.(Fig. 1)
4.) We evaluated Pconst. – taR12- Pconst. (low) – YF1/ FixJ – Pfixk2 – HHR(Fig. 6).
Fig. 6 Pconst. – taR12- Pconst. (low) – YF1/ FixJ – Pfixk2 - HHR
We estimate in light GFP is expressed by HHR’s self cleavage and in dark GFP isn’t expressed by taRNA’s expression. If HHR’s active site is mutated, GFP isn’t expressed.
The GFP fluorescence intensity was taken after main culture for 12 h by Plate Reader in this evaluation method.
Result
There is no clear difference of light and dark condition of HHR-GFPuv or HHR*-GFPuv.
The cause of this result is that excitation light of GFP and YF1 is almost the same.
Result 1 Evaluation of transformed E.coli under the light or dark condition.
If HHR’s active site isn’t mutated difference between in light or dark is observed. This result is suggested that in light taRNA is expressed and HHR’s auto cleavage is inhibited.
RNA oscillator’s result is difference between taRNA’s existence or absence isn’t observed. We think that this difference is caused by difference between Pconst.(low) and Pbad.
Result 2 Evaluation of transformed E. coli under the light or dark condition.
Future work
We want to evaluate Pconst. - Yf1/FixJ - Pfixk2- TR(12)- HHR- GFP- DT and Pfixk2 - taR12 - Pconst.(low) TR(12)- HHR- GFP- Pconst.- YF1/ FixJ by changing main culture time and changing evaluation method again.
We want to synchronize oscillation cycle with Twinkle. coli by light sensor protein in the future.
Reference
[1] J. Mol. Biol.(2009) 385, 1433-1444
[2] J. Mol. Biol. (2012) 416, 534-542
[3] Bacteriology (1998) 180, 5251-5255
[4] Xue-Nong Zhang et al. (1999) The specificity of interaction of archaeal transducers with their cognate sensory rhodopsins is determined by their transmembrane helices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
[5] Wouter D. Hoff et al. (1997) Molecular mechanism of photosignaling by archaeal sensory rhodopsin, Anmu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.