Team:Minnesota/Project/Insulin
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(8 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
<h1>Constructing Parts to Express Active Human Insulin</h1><br> | <h1>Constructing Parts to Express Active Human Insulin</h1><br> | ||
- | < | + | <b><font size="4"> Insulin: Basic Background </font></b><br> |
+ | <br> | ||
- | <p> | + | <p> |
+ | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>What is the role of Insulin in the Human body?</u></i> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Insulin is a hormone produced by the pancreas that removes glucose from the blood. In healthy individuals, excess glucose is readily removed from the blood stream by a proportional production of insulin. In persons with diabetes mellitus however; the body is either resistant to insulin, or it has a reduced capacity to produce insulin. Those individuals require an external source of insulin. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | |||
- | < | + | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>Why are we expressing human Insulin?</u></i> |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The ability to produce recombinant human Insulin cheaply has long been a lucrative goal. There are millions of people worldwide who are dependent on Insulin derived from production methods that make the product expensive -and further yet- potentially dangerous.Our team thinks that the current production methods for human Insulin are inefficient and can be optimized by being expressed in Pichia pastoris. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | < | + | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>What is the current method for Human Insulin production?</u></i> |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli have historically been the preferred host cells to produce recombinant human insulin; however, each one of these organisms has great disadvantages. E. coli lack secretory mechanisms, thus the cells must be lysed and processed to isolate the insulin. Another concern with E.coli is the lactose operon acting as an inducible system to control gene expression. S. cerevisiae, on the other hand, have the necessary secretory machinery to secrete insulin, but they produce it at very low yields compared to E. coli. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
+ | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>Why are we using Pichia pastoris to express Human Insulin?</u></i> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | P. pastoris is a eukaryotic organism in the yeast family that overcomes both obstacles encountered by the aforementioned organisms. P. pastoris has been shown to excrete proteins at a rate of approximately five times that of S. cerevisiae with higher qualitative value as well. Recombinant human insulin has been produced in P. pastoris, but the harvesting and processing procedures are long, complex, and would be greatly simplified through the application of the BioBrick system. P. pastoris is already utilized by the Chinese for various industrial tasks, lending more promise to it as our choice, as industrial application would require very little change to our system. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>What are some risks associated with this design?</u></i> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Our system poses a hopeful future for diabetes sufferers, but, as with any medical breakthrough there are some risks to be aware of. Although the risk of allergy or rejection will be reduced, there may still be adverse side effects that we cannot foresee despite careful testing in the laboratory, until the synthetically secreted protein is actually trial tested in humans. Although great caution can be taken to solidify the safety of our synthetic system, unpredictable mutations may still occur that, again, cannot be foreseen until human trials are conducted. The proposal of human trials alone poses a dilemma for ethical reasons. | ||
+ | <br><br><br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b><font size="4"> PCSK1 </font></b><br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <i><u><font size="3">• </font>What is PCSK1?</u></i> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | PCSK1 encodes for preprotein convertase type I, which is regarded as the most important enzyme in the first step of insulin processing in humans. Since our model organism P. pastoris lacks this enzyme it is hypothesized that its addition will increase efficiency of Insulin over the lineage.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<p><b>Methods</b><br><br> | <p><b>Methods</b><br><br> | ||
Insulin and PCSK1 Open Reading Frame Design | Insulin and PCSK1 Open Reading Frame Design | ||
Line 162: | Line 191: | ||
Several colonies were identified in colony screens for PCSK1 and insulin in transformants containing the shipping vector. Seen below are verification gels for PCSK1 and insulin. | Several colonies were identified in colony screens for PCSK1 and insulin in transformants containing the shipping vector. Seen below are verification gels for PCSK1 and insulin. | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | + | <img src="http://i791.photobucket.com/albums/yy194/GopheriGEM/09-17-2013PCSK1ColonyScreen_zps3855c144.jpg" width=40% height=40%> | |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Figure 1. PCR colony screen of PCSK1-pSB1C3 transformants. Note the banding in each lane at roughly 750 bp, consistent with the second fragment of PCSK1. | ||
+ | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | + | <imb src="http://i791.photobucket.com/albums/yy194/GopheriGEM/9-13-2013pSB1C3-InsColonyScreen_zps8e2db536.jpg" width=40% height=40%> | |
- | + | <br> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | Figure 2. PCR colony screen of Ins-pSB1C3 transformants. Banding can be seen at roughly 333 bp, consistent with the full insulin ORF. | |
+ | Sequencing data received for both PCSK1 and insulin was inconclusive. | ||
- | < | + | <br><br> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
+ | <p><b>Parts List</b><br> | ||
+ | BBa_K1187001 Human insulin, codon optimized for expression in <i>P. pastoris</i><br><br> | ||
- | + | </p> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
<!---END--> | <!---END--> |
Latest revision as of 03:40, 28 September 2013