From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| (17 intermediate revisions not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | {{:Team:UNIK_Copenhagen/Signe_Nav}}
| |
| - | <html>
| |
| - | <div class="the_content">
| |
| - | <div id="article">
| |
| - | <h1>Experimental Approach</h1>
| |
| - | <p>
| |
| - | To realize our idea of exploring and demonstrating the high biotechnological potential of the magnetosome nanoparticles, we had to find a way to execute this idea in a limited time frame and in a way that would get us results which also needed to be easily communicable to a wide audience. Our solution was the thought of linking a fluorescent protein to the magnetosome membrane. This fluorescent protein, would give us results that could be communicated with just a simple picture of our bacteria cells and could be just as easily understood by everyone. In addition it would highlight one of the big advantages magnetosomes have over other nanomagnets, they are surrounded by a lipid bilayer, a feature which we wanted to utilize. The fluorescent protein could be easily replaced by for example a drug, another protein, a dye and more to realize a wide range of possible applications in the future.
| |
| - | <br><br>
| |
| - | As a membrane anchor to link our fluorescent protein to the magnetosome we chose a protein called MamC that convinced us with its excellent properties. MamC is known for being highly abundant, very stable and non-interfering with the magnetosome formation itself which made it the perfect match for our experiment (Grünberg et al 2004; Scheffel et al. 2006). As our model organisms to work with in the lab, we chose two strains of magnetotactic bacteria that we saw have been also chosen by the majority of researchers working in this field. Exciting to us was that both needed different growing conditions to thrive, Magnetospirillum Gryphiswaldense needs oxygen while the other candidate Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum likes anaerobic conditions, growing them sounded like a nice challenge. For making our gene constructs of MamC plus fluorescent gene before moving them into the magnetotactic bacteria we decided to work with the well known all-rounder Escherichia coli.
| |
| - | <br><br>
| |
| - | We then realized that we had to choose an additional fluorescent protein to work with other than the usually utilized green fluorescent protein (GFP). GFP shows green fluorescence when exposed to blue light. Since GFP requires oxygen for its chromophore production, which is responsible for its fluorescence, it could only be used efficiently with our aerobic strain. Therefore we chose a flavin mononucleotide–based fluorescent protein (FBFP), which is able to fluoresce without needing oxygen, to use in our anaerobic strain (Drepper et al. 2007).
| |
| - | <br><br>
| |
| - | For fun we also picked up our own Copenhagen strain from local waters and tested out how to isolate and grow it. Further on we want to sequence its genome and compare it to the genome of other magnetotactic bacteria.
| |
| - | </p>
| |
| | | | |
| - |
| |
| - |
| |
| - | </div>
| |
| - | </html>
| |
Latest revision as of 20:49, 27 August 2013
"
