Team:Grenoble-EMSE-LSU/Documentation/Notebook/May
From 2013.igem.org
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<p>Meeting with Yohan Roulland at the Institut Albert Bonniot (Grenoble medical campus), regarding the use of KillerRed.</br> | <p>Meeting with Yohan Roulland at the Institut Albert Bonniot (Grenoble medical campus), regarding the use of KillerRed.</br> | ||
Information obtained: KillerRed is more effective as a dimer, whereas the gene itself only codes for a monomer. The dimer form can be obtained by fusing one KillerRed protein to another directly after it on the gene, or by fusing it with two different proteins which operate close to each other in the cell, thereby bringing their respective KillerRed proteins close enough for dimerization to occur.</br> | Information obtained: KillerRed is more effective as a dimer, whereas the gene itself only codes for a monomer. The dimer form can be obtained by fusing one KillerRed protein to another directly after it on the gene, or by fusing it with two different proteins which operate close to each other in the cell, thereby bringing their respective KillerRed proteins close enough for dimerization to occur.</br> | ||
- | Expression of KillerRed in the cytoplasm of different organelles in eukaryotic cells hasn’t had any effect: expression in the cytoplasm of the nucleus didn’t successfully kill the cells. Since it is most probable that bacteria are more resistant to oxidative damage than eukaryotes, this would mean that a specific target protein needs to be chosen in E. Coli so as to significantly damage the cell and kill it when KillerRed produced ROS.</p> | + | Expression of KillerRed in the cytoplasm of different organelles in eukaryotic cells hasn’t had any effect: expression in the cytoplasm of the nucleus didn’t successfully kill the cells. Since it is most probable that bacteria are more resistant to oxidative damage than eukaryotes, this would mean that a specific target protein needs to be chosen in E. Coli so as to significantly damage the cell and kill it when KillerRed produced ROS.</br></br> |
+ | Experiments</br> | ||
+ | As the first experiment didn’t yield any quantitative information, we need to develop a rigorous protocol in order to substract background noise from fluorescence measurements more precisely, as well as prove that only the bacteria that have been transformed with the correct plasmid, and induced with arabinose, are actually fluorescing.</br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We have a microplate reader at our disposal that can perform repeated measures at regular intervals as well as injections of liquid at designated times. We can use it to keep the culture warm, shaked and to induce production of GFP with arabinose at a certain time.</br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The experiment consisted in preparing a microplate with different solutions containing a combination of the following: | ||
+ | Pbad-GFP transfected cells or Wild-type cells in Luria-Bertani Miller growth medium | ||
+ | Arabinose at different concentrations</br> | ||
+ | Kanamycin as an antibiotic to select for Pbad-GFP transfected cells</p> | ||
<h2>Week 5 (27-31)</h2> | <h2>Week 5 (27-31)</h2> |
Revision as of 11:37, 15 September 2013