Team:SYSU-China/Project/Design
From 2013.igem.org
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
Surely, we will keep trying to find genes that only lead to apoptosis but not necrosis in the future, the better solution, in our mind, may be a combination of multiple apoptotic genes. | Surely, we will keep trying to find genes that only lead to apoptosis but not necrosis in the future, the better solution, in our mind, may be a combination of multiple apoptotic genes. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3>RIP 3</h3> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | RIP3, like RIP 1, is also a member of Receptor Interacting Protein family. It works via the interaction with RIP 1, and thus induces the necrosis pathway which RIP 1 mediated.[1] | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | However, it have also been reported that over expression of RIP 3 in certain cell lines can induce apoptosis<a class="quote">[15]</a>.In our experiment, we found out that RIP 3 can lead to cell death in several cell lines, including HTC-75 cell lines and HEK-293 cell lines. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Because RIP 3 mainly induces necrosis, we select it as our candidate of suicide genes for the same reasons as we select RIP 1. And we also suggest that when using RIP 3 to cure cancer, tight control expression system may be necessary.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 08:45, 26 September 2013
ipsc
Which suicide gene?
Why suicide gene?
In our project, we try to build a circuit that can prevent the iPSC-differentiated tissues from tumor formation. Instead of using some medicines to kill them, like the traditional gene therapies did, what we want to achieve here is to make the tumor cells kill themselves, in other word, automatically commit suicide. So we decided to use an exogenous suicide gene.
The ideal suicide genes that fit our design here will be genes that can successfully induce apoptosis in cells and do not introduce any harmful effect to normal tissues. However, many apoptosis pathways are reported to be blocked in tumor cells. From recent reports and papers, we found out that there have been many genes reported to have important roles in mammalian cell apoptosis. After a long time comparison and consideration, our final candidates of suicide gene are listed below:
- hBax & hBax mutant
- delta TK
- caspase3
- rip1
- rip3
- apoptin
The introduction of each genes about its suicide mechanisms and the reasons why we choose them are as follows:
Which suicide gene?
hBax & hBax mutant
hBax is a member of the Bcl-2 related protein family from human. This Family contains pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins, and the balance among them determines the cell survival. hBax is the pro-apoptotic protein. During apoptosis, hBax will be inserted into the mitochondrial outer membrane and form permeable channels, release pro-apoptotic signals, finally lead to apoptosis[1]. The pathway of apoptosis is showed in Figure 1.
Figure1. apoptosis pathway induced by hBaxhBax S184a[3] is a mutant of hBax that can constantly insert into mitochondrial outer membrane, thus we guess that it may have a stronger apoptosis-induced effect than normal hBax.
It have been reported that over expression of this gene can successfully induce apoptosis in both Hela cell line and HEK-293 cell line[2]. Due to its generality, we finally determined to use it as one of our suicide genes candidates.
However, our experiments results finally showed to us that, when expressed in Hep G2 cell line, which is a typical hepatoma cell line, they can not induce observable apoptosis. However, although it can not successfully kill Hep G2 cell line, we figured out that the pathway is conserved in yeast[4] ,so we also tried to transfect the gene and its mutant in yeast and finally proved that the killing effect is observable and even dose-dependent (BBa_K1061006). So this extra result may be useful for other team in the future who want to apply safety device in yeast. We finally submitted the hBax as a biobrick and its mutant form as an improvement of the pre-existing part of part registry.
(show results)
Caspase 3
Caspase 3 is the last downstream executer of apoptosis in most mammalian cells. Almost every apoptosis process needs the execution of caspase 3. As a cysteine protease, it can directly cleavage proteins inside cells and take part in DNA fragmentation[4]. Caspase 3 contains two subunits, p17 and p12, which are translated in the same ORF. When cleavaged by caspase 9, another kind of protease involving in apoptosis, they will form a dimer that will act as an active form[5].
Actually we split its gene into two parts, p17 and p12, and we used leuzine zipper to direct the dimerization of the two subunits[5].
However, in our project we finally decided to drop trying this gene, mainly for 3 reasons:
- The apoptotic effect needs two subunit to be expressed simultaneously, which would increase the complication of our circuit.
- To overcome the anti-apoptotic protein XIAP[6], which is high-expressed in Hep G2 cell line[7], we may need an extremely high expression of caspase 3, which would also be a problem for our experiment.
- We have mistakenly clone the wrong ORF of two subunits from the plasmid, so it leave us no time to do the experiment of caspase 3 before regional jamboree=.=.
Besides, we may try to test another version of active caspase 3---the reconstitute caspase 3 [8]in following days.
RIP 1
RIP1 is the abbreviation of Receptor Interacting Protein kinase 1 in mammalian cells. It is an important regulator of cell survival and death, taking part in several program cell death pathways[9]. It has been reported that over expression of RIP 1 can induce both apoptosis and necrosis[10] in certain cell lines. So it is a potential suitable suicide gene that we can use in our device.
We tested rip1 in several cell lines, including HTC-75, Bosc, and Hep G2 cell lines. What we have observed is a mix of both apoptosis and necrosis( result ). Although it can induce necrosis in cancer cell lines, which may potentially cause inflammation in tissues, we still consider it as our choice of suicide gene. The reasons are as follows:
- We know that in iPSC differentiation period, only a small fraction of cells will become cancerous at a certain time, so the necrosis of these cells would not likely to lead to severe inflammation.
- Many apoptosis pathways have been reported to be blocked in tumor cells, but there is some evidence revealing that when the apoptosis pathways are blocked the necrosis pathway will be activated[11]. Besides, some recent papers showed that RIP1 can trigger cell necrosis only with extra exogenous medicine. In other circumstances RIP1 could lead to apoptosis.
- We have cloned another receptor interacting protein kinase, RIP 3, which has been proved to interact with RIP 1 and lead to necrosis[12], so we think that even the over expression of RIP 1 can not successfully kill the cells, it may also co-express with RIP 3.
Surely, we will keep trying to find genes that only lead to apoptosis but not necrosis in the future, the better solution, in our mind, may be a combination of multiple apoptotic genes.
RIP 3
RIP3, like RIP 1, is also a member of Receptor Interacting Protein family. It works via the interaction with RIP 1, and thus induces the necrosis pathway which RIP 1 mediated.[1]
However, it have also been reported that over expression of RIP 3 in certain cell lines can induce apoptosis[15].In our experiment, we found out that RIP 3 can lead to cell death in several cell lines, including HTC-75 cell lines and HEK-293 cell lines.
Because RIP 3 mainly induces necrosis, we select it as our candidate of suicide genes for the same reasons as we select RIP 1. And we also suggest that when using RIP 3 to cure cancer, tight control expression system may be necessary.
References
[1]Jerry M. Adams and Suzanne Cory,The Bcl-2 Protein Family: Arbiters of Cell Survival ,Science 281, 1322 (1998)
[2]Zhen Xie et al.,Multi-Input RNAi-Based Logic Circuit for Identification of Specific Cancer cells, Science 333, 1307 (2011)
[3]Amotz Nechushtan et al, Conformation of the Bax C-terminus regulates subcellular location and cell death, The EMBO Journal Vol.18 No.9 pp.2330–2341, 1999.
[4]Alan G. Porter and Reiner U. JaÈ nicke, Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis, Cell Death and Differentiation (1999) 6, 99 -104
[5]Dattananda S. Chelur and Martin Chalfie, Targeted cell killing by reconstituted caspases, PNAS, 2007 , vol. 104 no. 7 2283–2288
[6] Stefan J. Riedl, Martin Renatus et al,Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Caspase-3 by XIAP,Cell, Vol. 104, 791–800,2001
[7] Xuanyong Lu, Matthew Lee et al, High level expression of apoptosis inhibitor in hepatoma cell line expressing Hepatitis B virus, Int. J. Med. Sci. 2005 2(1)
[8]Srinivasa M. Srinivasula et al,Generation of Constitutively Active Recombinant Caspases-3 and -6 by Rearrangement of Their Subunits, J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:10107-10111.
[9]N Festjens, T Vanden Berghe et al,RIP1, a kinase on the crossroads of a cell's decision to live or die, Cell Death and Differentiation (2007) 14, 400–410
[10]RIP3, an Energy Metabolism Regulator That Switches TNF-Induced Cell Death from Apoptosis to Necrosis
[11]Nils Holler et al, Fas triggers an alternative, caspase-8−independent cell death pathway using the kinase RIP as effector molecule, Nature Immunology 1, 489 - 495 (2000)
[12] Liming Sun et al,Mixed Lineage Kinase Domain-like Protein Mediates Necrosis Signaling Downstream of RIP3 Kinase,Cell,2012, 148, 213–227
[13]Priscilla E. M. Purnick & Ron Weiss ,The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10, 410-422,2009
[14]Liming Sun et al,Mixed Lineage Kinase Domain-like Protein Mediates Necrosis Signaling Downstream of RIP3 Kinase,Cell,2012, 148, 213–227
[15]Xiaoqing Sun et al ,RIP3, a Novel Apoptosis-inducing Kinase, THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, Vol. 274, No. 24, Issue of June 11, pp. 16871–16875, 1999
[16]Shi-Mei Zhuang et al, Apoptin, a Protein Derived from Chicken Anemia Virus, Induces p53-independent Apoptosis in Human Osteosarcoma Cells, Cancer Res 1995;55:486-489,
[17]Claude Backendorf et al, Apoptin: Therapeutic Potential of an Early Sensor of Carcinogenic Transformation, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2008. 48:143–69
[18]Xiao Li et al, Antitumor effects of a recombinant fowlpox virus expressing Apoptin in vivo and in vitro, Int. J. Cancer: 119, 2948–2957 (2006)
[19] Astrid A. A. M. Danen-van Oorschot,Importance of Nuclear Localization of Apoptin for Tumor-specific Induction of Apoptosis, THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, Vol. 278, No. 30, pp. 27729 –27736, 2003
[20]Lars Guelen et al,TAT-apoptin is efficiently delivered and induces apoptosis in cancer cells, Oncogene (2004) 23, 1153–1165
[21]Su-Xia Han et al,Secretory Transactivating Transcription-apoptin fusion protein induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells, World J Gastroenterol ,2008, 14(23): 3642-3649
[22]Kyozo KATO et al,Retroviral transfer of herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene into glioma cells causes targeting of gancyclovir cytotoxic effect, Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1994 ;34(6):339-44.
[23]Marc Mesniland Hiroshi Yamasaki,Bystander Effect in Herpes Simplex Virus-Thymidine Kinase/Ganciclovir Cancer Gene Therapy: Role of Gap-junctional Intercellular Communication, Cancer Res ,2000;60:3989-3999.
[24]BENOIˆT SALOMON et al, A Truncated Herpes Simplex Virus Thymidine Kinase Phosphorylates Thymidine and Nucleoside Analogs and Does Not Cause Sterility in Transgenic Mice, Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15(10):5322.
[25] http://www.clontech.com/CN/Products/Cell_Biology_and_Epigenetics/RNA_Interference/shRNA/Tet-Inducible_shRNA?sitex=10022:22372:US
[26]http://www.clontech.com/CN/Products/Cell_Biology_and_Epigenetics/RNA_Interference/MicroRNA/Tet-Inducible_MicroRNA?sitex=10022:22372:US
[27]Lei S. Qi et al, Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression, Cell 152, 1173–1183, 2013
[28]clontech,BD™ Tet-Off and Tet-On Gene Expression Systems User Manual
[29]http://www.clontech.com/CN/Products/Inducible_Systems/Tetracycline-Inducible_Expression/Tet-On_3G?sitex=10022:22372:US
[30]Jolanta Szulc et al, A versatile tool for conditional gene expression and knockdown, NATURE METHODS, VOL.3 NO.2,109-116
[31]Yi Li et al,Transcription activator-like effector hybrids for conditional control and rewiring of chromosomal transgene expression, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2 : 897
[32]Luke A. Gilbert et al,CRISPR-Mediated Modular RNA-Guided Regulation of Transcription in Eukaryotes, Cell 154, 442–451, July 18, 2013
[33]http://www.clontech.com/CN/Products/Cell_Biology_and_Epigenetics/RNA_Interference/MicroRNA/Tet-Inducible_MicroRNA?sitex=10022:22372:US
[34]http://www.clontech.com/CN/Products/Cell_Biology_and_Epigenetics/RNA_Interference/shRNA/Tet-Inducible_shRNA?sitex=10022:22372:US.
Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
Address: 135# Xingang Rd.(W.), Haizhu Guangzhou, P.R.China