"
Team:Kyoto/Humanpractice/Data
From 2013.igem.org
(→HumanPractice) |
(→Data) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<div class="texts"> | <div class="texts"> | ||
=Data= | =Data= | ||
| - | + | アンケートは選択肢形式にし、質問の初めに性別、出身国、年齢、宗教、職業を応えてもらい、それぞれの要素が回答にどのように影響してくるのかを調べた。また、外国人へのアンケートは、現地で実際に取ったほか、京都に来ている観光客からも集めた。（どこでやったか書く） | |
| + | アンケートは以下のものを使用した。<br><br> | ||
| + | '''Questionnaire!!!!'''<br> | ||
| + | Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?<br> | ||
| + | 1 Yes | ||
| + | 2 No<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible. <br> | ||
| + | 1 check | ||
| + | 2 no check<br> | ||
| + | Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease. <br> | ||
| + | Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.3 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can save people in disease.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.4 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can save people in disease. <br> | ||
| + | Q2.5 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.6 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.7 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can improve our life.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.8 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can improve our life.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.9 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.10 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.11 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can advance science.<br> | ||
| + | Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?<br> | ||
| + | 1 I know well. | ||
| + | 2 I know only its name. | ||
| + | 3 I do not know at all.<br> | ||
| + | Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?<br> | ||
| + | 1 Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene. | ||
| + | 2 Partly yes, some can be but others are not. | ||
| + | 3 No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible. <br> | ||
| + | 1 check | ||
| + | 2 no check<br> | ||
| + | Q5.1 Bacteria Q5.2 wheat Q5.3 honeybee Q5.4 killifish Q5.5 frog | ||
| + | Q5.6 chickens Q5.7 mouse Q5.8 dog Q5.9 monkey Q5.10 human beings<br> | ||
| + | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
{{Template:Kyoto/footer}} | {{Template:Kyoto/footer}} | ||
Revision as of 20:49, 26 September 2013
count down
Data
アンケートは選択肢形式にし、質問の初めに性別、出身国、年齢、宗教、職業を応えてもらい、それぞれの要素が回答にどのように影響してくるのかを調べた。また、外国人へのアンケートは、現地で実際に取ったほか、京都に来ている観光客からも集めた。（どこでやったか書く）
アンケートは以下のものを使用した。
Questionnaire!!!!
Q1 Have you ever thought about experiments using living things?
1 Yes
2 No
Q2 Do you think these experiments using living-creatures are permissible? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.
1 check
2 no check
Q2.1 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.
Q2.2 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can save people in disease.
Q2.3 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can save people in disease.
Q2.4 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can save people in disease.
Q2.5 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.
Q2.6 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can improve our life.
Q2.7 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can improve our life.
Q2.8 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can improve our life.
Q2.9 Subjects are killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.
Q2.10 Subjects can be killed in the experiment, but it can advance science.
Q2.11 Subjects are not killed in the experiment but they never go back in nature. However, it can advance science.
Q2.12 Subjects are only observed in nature and it can advance science.
Q3 How much do you know about genetically modifying (GM) technology?
1 I know well.
2 I know only its name.
3 I do not know at all.
Q4 Do you think modifying creature’s gene is ethically permissible or not?
1 Yes, we can modify every creatures’ gene.
2 Partly yes, some can be but others are not.
3 No, any living things’ gene cannot be modified.
Q5 Who answered ‘partly yes’ to the fifth question, please answer this question. Which of these creatures’ gene can be modified? Please give X as many as you think it is permissible.
1 check
2 no check
Q5.1 Bacteria Q5.2 wheat Q5.3 honeybee Q5.4 killifish Q5.5 frog
Q5.6 chickens Q5.7 mouse Q5.8 dog Q5.9 monkey Q5.10 human beings
