Team:Alberta/MainSafety
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "<html> <head> <style type="text/css"> .titlebar { height:130px; width:100%; } .bin { background:url('/wiki/images/e/e4/2013AlbertaBackground.png...") |
|||
Line 416: | Line 416: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><a href="/Team:Alberta/SafetyForm">Safety Form</a></li> | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/SafetyForm">Safety Form</a></li> | ||
- | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/FAQ | + | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/FAQ">FAQ</a></li> |
<li><a href="/Team:Alberta/Resources">Resources</a></li> | <li><a href="/Team:Alberta/Resources">Resources</a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> |
Revision as of 20:38, 26 September 2013
FAQ
Doesn’t E. coli cause food poisoning? If E. coli is so dangerous, why are they being used in labs?
- Normal E. coli colonize the lower intestine of humans, while producing Vitamin K and protecting infection from other harmful bacteria.
- Only some strains of E. coli cause food poisoning, but our group is using a harmless, nonpathogenic strain. This train is engineered to contain mutations that would not allow the E. coli to survive outside the lab without particular nutrients.
- E. coli provides a well-studied and well-known model system to test and troubleshoot new trials on.
Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1728375/
What if plasmids containing antibiotic resistance genes were released into the environment despite precautions?
- These genes are used in synthetic biology as selection tools.
- There are lower chances of gene uptake by wild bacteria compared to lab-strain bacteria which have perforated membranes.
- In the case that wild bacteria did uptake the antibiotic resistance gene, that gene would eventually be lost in the population without exposure to the antibiotic, because it is then a disadvantage for the bacteria to carry the unused plasmids. (Evidence observed in past with the decline of specific antibiotic resistance after the human population limited that antibiotic).