Team:NTNU-Trondheim/Notebook/October

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 62: Line 62:
[https://2013.igem.org/Team:NTNU-Trondheim/TransformedBricks Transformed BioBricks]
[https://2013.igem.org/Team:NTNU-Trondheim/TransformedBricks Transformed BioBricks]
-
 
+
<div class="row">
 +
<div class="col12-3" align = "justify">
 +
<div class="col12-3" align = "center" style="background-color:#C3A7F3;>
 +
<p style="text-align:center; color:black; "> October</p> </div>
 +
<div class ="row-end"> </div>
 +
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="row">
Line 69: Line 74:
<p style="text-align:center; color:black; "> Wednesday 02.10.2013</p> </div>
<p style="text-align:center; color:black; "> Wednesday 02.10.2013</p> </div>
<div class ="row-end"> </div>
<div class ="row-end"> </div>
-
</div
+
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="row">

Revision as of 13:20, 4 October 2013

Trondheim iGEM 2013

header
Mercury
[https://2013.igem.org/Team:NTNU-Trondheim/TransformedBricks Transformed BioBricks]
October

Wednesday 02.10.2013

SDS-PAGE of bacterial samples with the tat_GFP_RFP (ER1) and tat_ProteinG construct



In order to determine if Protein G is produced in the S3-2B sample and wheater a GFP-RFP dimer is produced in the ER1 sample, a SDS-PAGE was performed. Liquid cell culture with ER1 (tat_GFP_RFP construct), S3-2B (tat_ProteinG construct) and wildtype ER2566 ''E.coli'' cells was centrifuged and the pallet was mixed with SDS loading buffer. This mix was then heated at 95 °C for 15 minutes. The SDS-PAGE results can be viewed in the figure below

Figure 1: SDS-PAGE of bacterial samples. From the left: wild type ER2566, tat_GFP_RFP and tat_ProteinG

There is evidently produced Protein G in the S3-2B sample as there is an additional band at the expected size of about 60 kDa. There is also an additional band at the ER1 sample of about 28-30 kDa. This half the expected size of about 60 kDa. This indicates that only RFP is produced in the bacterias.