Team:Leeds/Parts
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Team:Leeds_layout|Header=Leeds' Registry Parts|content= | {{Team:Leeds_layout|Header=Leeds' Registry Parts|content= | ||
- | + | Please check back here frequently for a full list of the parts we've developed, submitted to the [http://partsregistry.org Registry] and have had approved. We will also endeavour to include our characeterisation protocols, although we are currently collaborating with [[Team:Purdue|Purdue]] to decide exactly what these should be. | |
<br> | <br> | ||
- | ''proper part documentation is to describe and define a part such that it can be used without a need to refer to the primary literature. The next iGEM team should be able to read your documentation and be able to use the part successfully. Also, you should provide proper references to acknowledge previous authors and to provide for users who wish to know more'' | + | '''Note to Team:''' ''proper part documentation is to describe and define a part such that it can be used without a need to refer to the primary literature. The next iGEM team should be able to read your documentation and be able to use the part successfully. Also, you should provide proper references to acknowledge previous authors and to provide for users who wish to know more'' |
<br> | <br> | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ |
Revision as of 10:50, 15 July 2013
Please check back here frequently for a full list of the parts we've developed, submitted to the [http://partsregistry.org Registry] and have had approved. We will also endeavour to include our characeterisation protocols, although we are currently collaborating with Purdue to decide exactly what these should be.
Currently Working On
SubmittedA full listing of all parts Leeds iGEM 2013 have submitted to the Registry, and their status.
Characterisation Protocols
| |||||||
| |||||||