Team:Greensboro-Austin/Standard Proposal

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Introduction)
(Introduction)
Line 28: Line 28:
Previous Standards:
Previous Standards:
-
As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering emerged, arguments for the standardizing the assembly methods involved in constructing plasmids also emerged.
+
As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering emerged, arguments for the standardizing the assembly methods involved in constructing plasmids also emerged...
 +
Why standards are awesome...
-
 
+
Drawbacks...
-
Why the Idea of standards is good:
+
-
 
+
-
Drawbacks
+
Line 42: Line 40:
[updated probability chart with GC content-inserted here]
[updated probability chart with GC content-inserted here]
-
We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across  the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:
+
[because of this] We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across  the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:
==Survey Results==
==Survey Results==

Revision as of 20:56, 28 August 2013


Open Source Initiative

Introduction

Previous Standards: As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering emerged, arguments for the standardizing the assembly methods involved in constructing plasmids also emerged...


Why standards are awesome...


Drawbacks...


[updated probability chart with GC content-inserted here]

[because of this] We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:

Survey Results