Team:Macquarie Australia/Safety

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 31: Line 31:
<font size = 3><b>3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?</font size></b><br><br>
<font size = 3><b>3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?</font size></b><br><br>
-
 
-
 
-
<b>1.</b> Does your university have a Biosafety Committee or equivalent? Please provide a link to regulations and local requirements.<br>
 
-
<b>2.</b> Is your project in compliance with national regulations and university requirements?<br>
 
-
<b>3.</b> If you are working with any organisms or parts requiring containment arrangements above BSL 1 or equivalent, have you consulted with your Institutional Biosafety Committee regarding your project?</font><br><br>
 
<font size = 2>Macquarie University Ryde, NSW Australia does have a Biosafety Committee; information on the committee can be accessed by the links below</font><br><br>
<font size = 2>Macquarie University Ryde, NSW Australia does have a Biosafety Committee; information on the committee can be accessed by the links below</font><br><br>

Revision as of 01:18, 29 August 2013



Use this page to answer the questions on the safety page.

iGEM Safety Questions



1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues?


Project Safety concerns-


To minimise risk of contamination or harm to researchers participating in the study or the environment, all students involved in the iGEM Macquarie University 2013 team received safety information according to the Macquarie University’s safety guidelines. The team also experienced an induction on how to operate specific machines within the lab, for example how to safely use the electroporator when dealing with chemicals and containers. We were supervised at all times by a senior member, or professor when working within the labs. A few examples of safe practices we employed to avoid biological material contamination include; disposal of biological waste in biohazard bins, correct labelling of materials, disinfect (with ethanol) the benches both before and after use and adhere to safe laboratory practices (including wearing lab coats, glasses and enclosed shoes etc.). Also to protect personnel and the environment, the chemicals involved in the lab work were used according to MSDS standards.

The host cells we used were Escherichia coli Star, which is categorised as a Biosafety Level 1 according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). Thus this E. coli strain has a low health risk to humans, the community and the environment. The plasmid pSB1S3 was provided by iGEM and is identified as a low safety risk (BSL1). The gBlocks, vector DNA and chlorophyll genes (which originated form Chalymodmonas reinhardtii) and were meticulously handled according to the gene regulations of the Australian Government’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, whom abide by the Gene Technology Act 2000.

Pathogenic sequences? Search GenBank.

2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise safety issues?

Potential BioBrick safety concerns:

We are not aware of any dangers with any of the biobrick parts that we are using in the project. We will continue to monitor for any issues with the parts as the project progresses.


3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

Macquarie University Ryde, NSW Australia does have a Biosafety Committee; information on the committee can be accessed by the links below

Macquarie University - Bioethics approval
Macquarie University - Biosafety


The committee complies with the Australian Government regulations and strongly urges researchers to be familiar with the Gene Technology Regulation Act (2000) and the Gene Technology Regulations (2001) as well as the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) which hold regulations and requirements to keep notifiable risks to a minimum. Experiments involving cloning or transformation of organisms must pass approval by the Biosafety committee in which we were granted (approval number REF: 5201001087EX) for the expression of genes involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis in-vitro Escherichia coli.

4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?


Guidance:
This is an open-ended space for you to consider and suggest ways of improving safety or safety awareness at iGEM and beyond. Some iGEM teams have offered ideas (and sometimes full projects) to limit gene flow, to create software for screening pathogens, and to reduce reliance on antibiotic resistant markers. Other iGEM projects have discussed concerns that might arise if the project succeeded and became widely used, as commercial product or other means of distribution. Some iGEM projects have discussed risks that might materialize if the knowledge generated or methods developed were to become more widely available.
[Coming Soon]
  1. Text
  2. More text