"
Team:Greensboro-Austin/Standard Proposal
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Introduction) |
(→RFC_95 9.2.13) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
==RFC_95 9.2.13== | ==RFC_95 9.2.13== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Igem standard1.png]] | ||
==Survey Results== | ==Survey Results== | ||
Revision as of 06:07, 3 September 2013
Contents |
Open Source Initiative
Introduction
Previous Standards:
As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering emerged, arguments for the standardizing the assembly methods involved in constructing plasmids also emerged...
Why standards are awesome...
Drawbacks...
[updated probability chart with GC content-inserted here]
[because of this] We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:
RFC_95 9.2.13
Survey Results
Introduction
Previous Standards: As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering emerged, arguments for the standardizing the assembly methods involved in constructing plasmids also emerged...
Why standards are awesome...
Drawbacks...
[updated probability chart with GC content-inserted here]
[because of this] We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:
RFC_95 9.2.13
Survey Results
