Team:Wageningen UR/pH biosensor
From 2013.igem.org
(→pH biosensor) |
(→pH biosensor) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
- | < | + | <h4>pHRed</h4> |
<p>A novel approach in measuring intracellular pH in a non-invasive way has been developed by Mathew Tantama et. al. 2011, by using a recombinant red fluorescent protein (RFP), termed mKeima, had been genetically engineered into a S213A mutant, called pHRed. This will allow it to exhibit dual excitation peaks at 440 nm and 585 nm and an emission peak at 610 nm that respond ratiometrically well to pH changes [<a href="#ref5">5</a>]. The advantages of using a ratiometric method is that the estimation of pH is not affected by photobleaching, changes in focus of the microscope, variations in laser intensity, optical path length and illumination intensity. The excitation peak at 585 nm is caused by the anionic chromophore in an acidic condition whereas the excitation peak at 440 nm is caused by the protonated neutral chromophore in an alkaline condition. The pH can be calculated by measuring the fluorescence intensity ratio between F585 and F440 (F585/ F440); and compare it with a calibration curve, see FIG. pH responses to ratio intensity of F585/ F440 are not affected in different buffer concentration such as Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl−, Ca2+, HCO3−, H2O2, DTT, and temperature (21°C to 37°C). Based on these findings, pHRed had proven to be useful in monitoring and analyzing the dynamic changes in pH. | <p>A novel approach in measuring intracellular pH in a non-invasive way has been developed by Mathew Tantama et. al. 2011, by using a recombinant red fluorescent protein (RFP), termed mKeima, had been genetically engineered into a S213A mutant, called pHRed. This will allow it to exhibit dual excitation peaks at 440 nm and 585 nm and an emission peak at 610 nm that respond ratiometrically well to pH changes [<a href="#ref5">5</a>]. The advantages of using a ratiometric method is that the estimation of pH is not affected by photobleaching, changes in focus of the microscope, variations in laser intensity, optical path length and illumination intensity. The excitation peak at 585 nm is caused by the anionic chromophore in an acidic condition whereas the excitation peak at 440 nm is caused by the protonated neutral chromophore in an alkaline condition. The pH can be calculated by measuring the fluorescence intensity ratio between F585 and F440 (F585/ F440); and compare it with a calibration curve, see FIG. pH responses to ratio intensity of F585/ F440 are not affected in different buffer concentration such as Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl−, Ca2+, HCO3−, H2O2, DTT, and temperature (21°C to 37°C). Based on these findings, pHRed had proven to be useful in monitoring and analyzing the dynamic changes in pH. | ||
</p> | </p> |
Revision as of 10:51, 27 September 2013
- Safety introduction
- General safety
- Fungi-related safety
- Biosafety Regulation
- Safety Improvement Suggestions
- Safety of the Application
Biosensor
ATP equals H ^+^
Introduction
In the growing field of synthetic biology, especially in the case of iGEM, a great array of existing and new biological devices and systems have been designed and streamlined for useful purposes. However, there are currently not enough emphases in how these biological devices behaved in their physiological surroundings, such as the effect of difference in pH and the availability of ATP. It would be ideal to develop a method that can monitor the dynamic changes in vivo of different concentrations and temporal levels of pH and ATP, which will allow us to determine how effective and efficient a biological device perform and how it can be further improved. This has led us in introducing two biosensors, ATP and pH biosensors, which involved two different mechanisms, with one being fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) based biosensor and the other being recombinant red fluorescence protein (pHRed) based biosensor. Furthermore, measurements using both biosensors are based in ratiometric methods, which eliminate the influence of photobleaching, laser intensity and etc. By combining multicolour, pHRed (red fluorescence) and FRET (green fluorescence), we are able to simultaneously image intracellular pH and ATP, as changes in metabolism and ATP availability often correlates with the changes in pH. These biosensors are useful to non-invasively quantify specific measurements in living cells.
pH biosensor
Regulation of intracellular pH is important for the metabolism of a functional cell as it is tightly regulated by the complex interactions between the consumption, production, transportation and buffering of H+ [3][4]. To maintain protein stability, enzyme and ion channel activity, growth and division, it is essential to retain pH within their physiological range of pH 7.5 [1]. In addition, it is important to maintain a proton gradient between the cytoplasm and mitochondria, which allow the formation of ATP to sustain their metabolism. Aspergillus niger is a GRAS organism that is among the favourites in producing organic acid as it can tolerate acidic environment. Since Aspergillus niger can produce high amount of organic acid, it would be interesting to investigate the fluctuation and difference in pH between the cytoplasm and mitochondria during the production of citric acid. This would be interesting to determine whether the pH, at a certain position in a filamentous fungi, is optimal for a certain reaction. This will allow us to direct and target a metabolic pathway into its appropriate compartments for optimal production. This will also allow us to elucidating the mechanism in how fast the homeostatic pH is being regulated when acid is production with extracellular acidic environment.
pHRed
A novel approach in measuring intracellular pH in a non-invasive way has been developed by Mathew Tantama et. al. 2011, by using a recombinant red fluorescent protein (RFP), termed mKeima, had been genetically engineered into a S213A mutant, called pHRed. This will allow it to exhibit dual excitation peaks at 440 nm and 585 nm and an emission peak at 610 nm that respond ratiometrically well to pH changes [5]. The advantages of using a ratiometric method is that the estimation of pH is not affected by photobleaching, changes in focus of the microscope, variations in laser intensity, optical path length and illumination intensity. The excitation peak at 585 nm is caused by the anionic chromophore in an acidic condition whereas the excitation peak at 440 nm is caused by the protonated neutral chromophore in an alkaline condition. The pH can be calculated by measuring the fluorescence intensity ratio between F585 and F440 (F585/ F440); and compare it with a calibration curve, see FIG. pH responses to ratio intensity of F585/ F440 are not affected in different buffer concentration such as Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl−, Ca2+, HCO3−, H2O2, DTT, and temperature (21°C to 37°C). Based on these findings, pHRed had proven to be useful in monitoring and analyzing the dynamic changes in pH.
Strategy and Approach
To utilize pHRed for in vivo measurements of pH inside a filamentous fungi during citric acid production, two constructs were made. With one targeting into the cytoplasm and the other targeting into the mitochondrial by transforming fungi with a naked pHRed sensor and pHRed sensor fused with mitochondrial signal peptide, respectively. The mitochondrial signal peptide has been proven to target into the mitochondria of Asp. Niger [2] . To measure pH, a calibration curve is established by purifying streptagII fused at N-terminus of pHRed proteins from sonificated E. coli, and is observed under a fluorescence microscope.
Research Aims
1.Make 2 contructs for targeting pHRed to cytoplasmic and mitochondrial compartments.
2.Purify strepTagII-pHRed from sonificated E. coli. and make a calibration curve.
3.Transform Aspergilllus niger with cytoplasmic pHRed and mitochondrial pHRed
4.Measure in vivo pH during citric acid production by Asp. Niger in time lapse using a fluorescence microscope
Results
After transformation of DH5α with 1µl of mixture (gibson assembly with pJet1.2 blunt vector), 7 colonies were picked and were cultured in 5 ml LB medium with ampicillin. Afterwards, plasmids were isolated using a miniprep kit (thermo scientific) according to their protocol using a homemade silicon column. Culture #1 till #3 were digested with pstI and notI; culture #4 till #7 were digested with nsiI and notI, see Figure 1.
References
1.Bagar, T., K. Altenbach, et al. (2009). "Live-Cell imaging and measurement of intracellular pH in filamentous fungi using a genetically encoded ratiometric probe." Eukaryot Cell 8(5): 703-712.
2.Blumhoff, M. L., M. G. Steiger, et al. (2013). "Targeting enzymes to the right compartment: Metabolic engineering for itaconic acid production by Aspergillus niger." Metabolic Engineering 19(0): 26-32.
3.Felle, H. H. (1996). "Control of cytoplasmic pH under anoxic conditions and its implication for plasma membrane proton transport in Medicago sativa root hairs." Journal of Experimental Botany 47(7): 967-973.
4.Madshus, I. H. (1988). "Regulation of intracellular pH in eukaryotic cells." Biochem J 250(1): 1-8.
5.Tantama, M., Y. P. Hung, et al. (2011). "Imaging intracellular pH in live cells with a genetically encoded red fluorescent protein sensor." J Am Chem Soc 133(26): 10034-10037.
1)Introduction
-Rationale
-Aim
-Approach
-Research Methods
2)Results
3)Discussion
-Future perspective