Team:Minnesota/Outreach/ECORI
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
Finally, we concluded the session with a Q and A in which students could ask us whatever they wanted about synthetic biology. We addressed questions proposed by students concerning human trials, or potential environment issues. We answered these questions by engaging students in an ethical conversation. We had originally developed a discussion session exclusively regarding bioethics, but deemed it inappropriate for the level of philosophy taught in middle schools.<br> | Finally, we concluded the session with a Q and A in which students could ask us whatever they wanted about synthetic biology. We addressed questions proposed by students concerning human trials, or potential environment issues. We answered these questions by engaging students in an ethical conversation. We had originally developed a discussion session exclusively regarding bioethics, but deemed it inappropriate for the level of philosophy taught in middle schools.<br> | ||
In order for this curriculum to suit an older age group, the ethics portion would contain discussion about what we can innovate using synthetic biology, and what would be better left alone. We would engage students with the following questions:<br><br> | In order for this curriculum to suit an older age group, the ethics portion would contain discussion about what we can innovate using synthetic biology, and what would be better left alone. We would engage students with the following questions:<br><br> | ||
- | + | <ul> | |
- | + | <li>Where should we draw the line concerning manipulating human genetics? | |
- | + | <li>How would modified organisms be responsibly controlled? | |
+ | <li>What would be the impact of introducing genetically altered organisms into a preexisting ecosystem? | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 17:39, 27 September 2013
Like us on FB and follow us on Twitter!