pBAD synthetic promoter library

As a tool for expressing lethal proteins in E. coli we made a synthetic promoter library (SPL, [http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/60080 RFC 63]) with the pBAD arabinose inducible promoter. The concept was taken from the DTU iGEM team from 2010.

Methods

Experimental procedure

1. Random promoter sequences were ordered matching the sequence CTGACGNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTAWWATNNNNA.
2. USER cloning to add RFP downstream of promoter.
3. Colonies were plated.
4. Plates were induced by spraying them with an aqueous arabinose solution.
5. Colonies that were not red prior to induction with arabinose but that did turn red after induction with arabinose were selected and re-innoculated as liquid cultures.
6. Biolector: Wells were inoculated from overnight cultures of each of the selected colonies. All wells were run in duplicate.
7. All duplicate colonies were run twice -- once with arabinose added at t=0, and again without arabinose.
8. The constitutive promoter TODO:which was used as a reference.

Data analysis

1. Data was collected from the Biolector, and analyzed using a series of R scripts written by Chris Workman (unpublished).
   • The maturation and degradation times for mCherry were both assumed to be 40 min. TODOref
   • The growth rate, mu, was estimated to be 1.28 (from an average of all wells on all plates) since we expect each strain to grow at the same rate.
   • A time window representing exponential growth was selected (between 1 and 4.5 hours).
2. The RFP measurement for a constitutively expressed strain was used as a standard measure of growth. This is plotted on the x-axis in the detailed plots per colony below.
3. Figures were plotted using R.

Results

Summary

Promoter activity when induced (with arabinose added) plotted vs basal activity (without arabinose; ie leakiness of the promoter). The colonies that we selected all show less activity than the the constitutive promoter, and when induced, show higher activity than the constitutive promoter.

Details

Promoter strengths for two trials of each colony with and without arabinose.

Example of use

The tight inducible pBAD promoter was used in our "Hello World project" to regulate the expression of GFP SF, which was tagged with a signal peptide to direct it into the periplasm. Production and folding of GFP SF is faster than the transport system of E. coli, which leads to undesired accumulation of GFP SF in the cytoplasm. Only when using a promoter with low leakiness it is possible to translocate a significant fraction of GFP SF after its production has been switched off. Thereby we get a clear signal from the periplasm with low interference from the cytoplasm.

Overview microscopic pciture showing "Hello World" transformants.

High resolution picture of "Hello World" transformants, showing a clear seperation of green and red fluorescence. GFP is primarily located in the periplasm while RFP is located in the cytoplasm. Fluorescence intensity measurements are taken along the cross-section indicated by the white line. Picture taken with a confocal microscope and ??? filter.

Graph of flourescence measurement (or is this the model???) on green and red channel. It can be seen that the intensity of the red flourescence is restricted to the cytoplasm while green flourescence has it's peaks on the egdes. A weak green signal is measured for the cytoplasmic region because the periplasm envelopes the cytoplasm.