Template:Team:Bonn:NetworkData
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 471: | Line 471: | ||
content.text= "<div class='content-image'><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/thumb/4/42/Bonn_OutlookCCSspB1_Version2.png/726px-Bonn_OutlookCCSspB1_Version2.png'>sspB structure and its conservation among C. crescentus, E. coli and H. influenzae [42.1]</div>The sspBα dimeric structure is stabilized by two α-helices in interaction, as part B of the figure above shows, each of them located at the N-terminus of either sspBα molecule. The subsequent parts of the protein form a domain consisting of two β-sheet structures, together building up the ssrA binding site. An unstructured area at the C-terminus being referred to as the XB module forms the ClpX binding part of the protein. It is connected to the rest of the molecule via a linker domain. [42.2]Chien et al. [42.1] compared crystal structures of C. crescentus sspBα and its E. coli and H. influenzae sspB orthologs, discovering that in sspBα the α-helices are significantly longer, more twisted and cover a larger cross section area than the other two sspB orthologs. Also considering that β-sheets are rotated by around 20° in comparison to E. coli and H. influenzae orthologs, this leads to an antiparallel orientation of the two ssrA tagged protein bound to the ssrA binding sites of an sspBα dimer in C. crescentus, while they are parallel in γ-protobacterial sspB. </br></br> <div class='content-image'><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/6c/Bonn_OutlookCCSspB2.png' align=left>By measuring GFP fluorescence intensity, decrease of GFP-<sup>CC</sup>ssrA concentration (1) without sspBα added, (2) with mutated sspBα(Q74A) added , (3) with wildtype sspBα added can be visualized. [42.1]</div> Chien et al. point out that although there are the remarkable differences in protein structure between sspBα and its γ-protobacterial ortholog, they show up with similar effectiveness in binding proteins tagged with the related ssrA peptide. But it turned out in their research that effectiveness of sspBα binding to the protein which needs to be tethered to the ClpXP protease strongly depends on which ssrA ortholog the protein is tagged with. sspBα binds firmly to <sup>CC</sup>ssrA, with an affinity being 175 times as large as for binding to <sup>EC</sup>ssrA (i.e. the E. coli ortholog). By comparing the crystal structures of both sspBα and the compound of sspBα and <sup>CC</sup>ssrA, Chien et al. further proved that binding of sspBα to <sup>CC</sup>ssrA does not lead to significant changes of its 3D conformation. </br></br> <h2>References</h2> </br>[42.1] Structure and substrate specificity of an SspB ortholog: design implications for AAA+ adaptors, Chien et al., Cell Press, 2007, PMID: 17937918 </br> [42.2] Bivalent tethering of sspB to ClpXP is required for efficient substrate delivery: a protein design study, Bolon DN et al., Mol Cell, 2004, PMID: 14967151"; <!-- References-Ueberschrift muss an Format des Bildes angepasst werden --> | content.text= "<div class='content-image'><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/thumb/4/42/Bonn_OutlookCCSspB1_Version2.png/726px-Bonn_OutlookCCSspB1_Version2.png'>sspB structure and its conservation among C. crescentus, E. coli and H. influenzae [42.1]</div>The sspBα dimeric structure is stabilized by two α-helices in interaction, as part B of the figure above shows, each of them located at the N-terminus of either sspBα molecule. The subsequent parts of the protein form a domain consisting of two β-sheet structures, together building up the ssrA binding site. An unstructured area at the C-terminus being referred to as the XB module forms the ClpX binding part of the protein. It is connected to the rest of the molecule via a linker domain. [42.2]Chien et al. [42.1] compared crystal structures of C. crescentus sspBα and its E. coli and H. influenzae sspB orthologs, discovering that in sspBα the α-helices are significantly longer, more twisted and cover a larger cross section area than the other two sspB orthologs. Also considering that β-sheets are rotated by around 20° in comparison to E. coli and H. influenzae orthologs, this leads to an antiparallel orientation of the two ssrA tagged protein bound to the ssrA binding sites of an sspBα dimer in C. crescentus, while they are parallel in γ-protobacterial sspB. </br></br> <div class='content-image'><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/6c/Bonn_OutlookCCSspB2.png' align=left>By measuring GFP fluorescence intensity, decrease of GFP-<sup>CC</sup>ssrA concentration (1) without sspBα added, (2) with mutated sspBα(Q74A) added , (3) with wildtype sspBα added can be visualized. [42.1]</div> Chien et al. point out that although there are the remarkable differences in protein structure between sspBα and its γ-protobacterial ortholog, they show up with similar effectiveness in binding proteins tagged with the related ssrA peptide. But it turned out in their research that effectiveness of sspBα binding to the protein which needs to be tethered to the ClpXP protease strongly depends on which ssrA ortholog the protein is tagged with. sspBα binds firmly to <sup>CC</sup>ssrA, with an affinity being 175 times as large as for binding to <sup>EC</sup>ssrA (i.e. the E. coli ortholog). By comparing the crystal structures of both sspBα and the compound of sspBα and <sup>CC</sup>ssrA, Chien et al. further proved that binding of sspBα to <sup>CC</sup>ssrA does not lead to significant changes of its 3D conformation. </br></br> <h2>References</h2> </br>[42.1] Structure and substrate specificity of an SspB ortholog: design implications for AAA+ adaptors, Chien et al., Cell Press, 2007, PMID: 17937918 </br> [42.2] Bivalent tethering of sspB to ClpXP is required for efficient substrate delivery: a protein design study, Bolon DN et al., Mol Cell, 2004, PMID: 14967151"; <!-- References-Ueberschrift muss an Format des Bildes angepasst werden --> | ||
content.type="Outlook"; | content.type="Outlook"; | ||
+ | break; | ||
+ | |||
+ | case 68: | ||
+ | content.i = 68; | ||
+ | content.parents=[54]; | ||
+ | content.childs=[]; | ||
+ | content.titleShort = "ccdA/ssdB"; | ||
+ | content.titleLong = "the ccd toxin-antitoxin system"; | ||
+ | content.summary= "this is a summary6"; | ||
+ | content.text= "The ccd module is a toxin-antitoxin (TA) system similar to the mazE/mazF system. The module is located on the F Plasmid in Escherichia coli bacteria and essential for their survival. Normally the toxin ccdB is inactivated by the presence of the antitoxin ccdA in the form of a ccdAB complex. If ccdA is no longer available, ccdB inhibits DNA gyrase which leads to cell death. Gyrase is a type IIA topoisomerase and is able to produce negative DNA supercoiling by making a double-strand break in the DNA and religating it. The gyrase enzyme consists of two subunits: the C-terminal GyrA domain that wraps around the DNA strand and the N-terminal GyrB domain that catalyses the ATP-dependant supercoiling of the DNA. CcdB stabilizes the gyrase cleavage complex by binding to the GyrA domain and thus blocks the catalytic function of the gyrase. That means that the gyrase remains bound to the DNA and the cleaved DNA is not religated. DNA- and RNA polymerases can’t copy the DNA anymore and cell proliferation as well as protein biosynthesis is stopped. The double-stranded breaks in the DNA initiate cell death.<p>Because gyrases are specific to bacteria such as E. coli it is also a target for some anti-bacterial medications e.g. ciprofloxacin (CFX). As can be seen in the data below, CcdB proves to be as effective as CFX at inducing DNA cleavage <sup><a href=#1>[1]</a></sup><sup><a href=#2>[2]</a></sup></p><div class='content-image'align='center'><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/2f/Sspb_CFX_compared.jpg' width='300'>Comparison of the effect of CcdB and CFX on gyrase activity. N: negatively supercoiled DNA, L: linear DNA, SC: supercoiled DNA. A higher concentration of CcdB/CFX leads to more cleaved (linear) DNA<sup><a href= http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635281/figure/fig2/>[source]</a></sup></div><div class='content-image' align='center'><img src='https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e4/Bonn_Ccdb_and_ccda.jpg' width='300'> A higher concentration of ccdB leads to blocking of gyrase and positively supercoiled DNA is cleaved to linear DNA instead of being processed to negatively supercoiled DNA. <sup><a href=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460896/figure/pone-0046499-g003/>[source]</a></sup></div><p>We used this system to build a light-induced kill-switch. Therefore we added the ssrA tag to the antitoxin ccdA. When the bacteria a emitted to light, ccdA is degraded and ccdB is set free and can bind to the gyrase. and cell death is initiated. Like in most TA systems, the toxin ccdB is relatively stable, while the antitoxin ccdA is vulnerable to degradation.</p><h2>References</h2><p><a name='1'>1.</a> <a href='http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635281/'>A strand-passage conformation of DNA gyrase is required to allow the bacterial toxin, CcdB, to access its binding site, Andrew B. Smith and Anthony Maxwell, Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 October; 34(17): 4667–4676, PMC 1635281</a></p><p><a name='2'>2.</a> <a href='http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3460896/'> A Common Origin for the Bacterial Toxin-Antitoxin Systems parD and ccd, Suggested by Analyses of Toxin/Target and Toxin/Antitoxin Interactions, Andew B. Smith et al, PLoS One. 2012; 7(9): e46499, | ||
+ | PMCID: PMC3460896 | ||
+ | </a></p>; | ||
+ | content.type="Background"; | ||
break; | break; | ||
Line 547: | Line 560: | ||
case 109: | case 109: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
content.i = 109; | content.i = 109; | ||
- | content.parents=[ | + | content.parents=[105]; |
content.childs=[]; | content.childs=[]; | ||
content.titleShort = "Comic"; | content.titleShort = "Comic"; | ||
content.titleLong = "Comic"; | content.titleLong = "Comic"; | ||
- | content.summary | + | content.summary= "On the mission to find new and interesting means to bring across the concepts of synthetic biology, we introduced a comic series consisting of three episodes in the style of the well known Star Wars movies. The readers will find themselves in a world where Galaxies are petri dishes and all the characters are bacteria. Alongside the action-filled story we step by step introduce basic concepts of synthetic biology. The use of light sabers and laser guns also offered a great opportunity to embed our system of light-degradable proteins in the plot. At our presentations at schools and at our information booth it proved to be an ideal eye-catcher for passers-by and led to them wanting to know more about the subject. |
- | + | During the episodes the reader accompanies the hero Obi-Wan E. Coli and his Padawan Plasmida on their journey through the Galaxy of Petri. They are fighting the villain Darth Cherry and his companions, the clones. But we don’t want to spoil the story for you, just read the comic yourself below. | |
+ | "; | ||
content.type="Human Practice"; | content.type="Human Practice"; | ||
break; | break; |
Revision as of 13:16, 3 October 2013