Team:Buenos Aires/ hybrid
From 2013.igem.org
(→Hybrid promoter induction) |
(→Hybrid promoter induction) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
A greater RFP fluorescence production can be seen in the culture induced with AHL, compared with the negative control. Besides, the culture of "Chromobacterium violaceum" turned violet 6 hours after "Rhizobium leguminosarum" conditioned medium was added. | A greater RFP fluorescence production can be seen in the culture induced with AHL, compared with the negative control. Besides, the culture of "Chromobacterium violaceum" turned violet 6 hours after "Rhizobium leguminosarum" conditioned medium was added. | ||
- | [[File: | + | [[File:IGEMBsAs2013PhibridoNico.JPG|center|400px]] |
'''Conclusions''' | '''Conclusions''' |
Revision as of 23:05, 27 October 2013
Hybrid promoter induction and repression
Hybrid promoter induction
Objective
Characterize the response of the hybrid promoter to the HSL/LuxR inducer complex.
Method
A culture of Rhizobium leguminosarum was grown overnight (ON), in TY medium, at 30°C. Besides, a culture of E. coli carrying a plasmid that encodes mRFP under a hybrid promoter inducible by the Lux system of Vibrio fischeri , and repressible by the phage repressor P22 C2 (Bba_K1106000) was also grown ON, at 37°C, in LB with the appropriate antibiotic. As a positive control, a Chromobacterium violaceum culture was grown at 30°C in LB medium.
Afterwards, the three cultures were centrifuged. E. coli (DH5α strain) and Chromobacterium violaceum culture’s supernatants were discarded and the pellets were resuspended in Rhizobium leguminosarum culture’s supernatant, containing AHL, which would induce mRFP expression in E. coli, and violacein expression in Chromobacterium violaceum. As a negative control, an "E. coli" culture containing the hybrid promoter was kept in the same medium at which it was previously grown.
Cultures were then grown for 70 hours in this conditions, taking aliquots after 0, 7, 24 and 70 hours of induction. Finally, bacteria were sonicated and fluorescence measured, normalized by cell growth (OD 600nm).
Results
A greater RFP fluorescence production can be seen in the culture induced with AHL, compared with the negative control. Besides, the culture of "Chromobacterium violaceum" turned violet 6 hours after "Rhizobium leguminosarum" conditioned medium was added.
Conclusions
According to the results, the hybrid promoter (Bba_K145150) can be induced by AHL-LuxR. However, fresh medium mRFP curve suggests a high basal transcription from this promoter.
Future experiment: Hybrid promoter repression
Objective
Characterize the repression of the hybrid promoter by c2 repressor.
Method
A culture of Rhizobium leguminosarum will be grown overnight (ON), in TY medium, at 30°C. Besides, a culture of E. coli co-transformed with BBa_K1106000 and the P22 C2 phage repressor under control of an arsenite inducible promoter (Bba_K1106012) will also be grown ON, at 37°C, in LB with the appropriate antibiotic. As a positive control, a Chromobacterium violaceum culture will be grown at 30°C in LB medium.
Afterwards, the three cultures will be centrifuged. E. coli and Chromobacterium violaceum culture’s supernatants will be discarded and the pellets resuspended in Rhizobium leguminosarum culture’s supernatant, containing HSL, which would induce mRFP expression in E. coli, and violacein expression in Chromobacterium violaceum. Moreover, E. coli culture will be split in two tubes with different arsenite concentrations (0 ppb and 1000 ppb). Cultures will then be grown for 72 hours, and aliquots will be taken at 0, 24 and 72 hours of induction. Finally, bacteria will be sonicated and fluorescence measured, normalized by cell growth (OD 600nm).