Highlights
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
- | + | <table align="center"> | |
- | + | ||
- | <table | + | |
- | + | ||
<tr><td> | <tr><td> | ||
+ | <iframe src="//player.vimeo.com/video/78937471" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <!-- picture row --> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <table border="0" align ="center" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"> | ||
+ | |||
<tr> | <tr> |
Revision as of 21:05, 8 November 2013
Europe |
Re- live |
North |
||
Latin |
World Championship |
Asia |
iGEM 2013 in Numbers |
Europe | North America | World Championship | Latin America | Asia |
58 Teams 711 participants 713 parts Undergrad Winner: Dundee Overgrad Winner: Bielefeld-Germany |
56 Teams 414 participants 457 parts Undergrad Winner: Penn Overgrad Winner: Lethbridge |
85 Teams 946 participants 1848 parts Undergrad Winner: Heidelberg Overgrad Winner: Paris Bettencourt |
11 Teams 66 participants 46 parts Regional Winner: TecMonterrey 1st Runner Up Buenos Aires |
65 Teams 573 participants 632 parts Undergrad Winner: NCTU Formosa Overgrad Winner: Hong Kong HKUST |
Come back soon to see more iGEM 2013 Highlights, including Project Highlights! |