Team:Groningen/Labwork/15 August 2013
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<Br>Did a miniprep on the other backbone with GFP and digested it with XbaI and PstI. Digested the hyperspank <br>backbone with XbaI and PstI and did a ligation O/N in a beaker with RT water in the fridge. | <Br>Did a miniprep on the other backbone with GFP and digested it with XbaI and PstI. Digested the hyperspank <br>backbone with XbaI and PstI and did a ligation O/N in a beaker with RT water in the fridge. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br>There where ~10 colonies on the negative control, ~30 on the 100µl plate and ~300 on the extra concentrated. <Br>plate. Picked 3 colonies and grew them O/N | ||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 11:57, 20 August 2013
Inne
Plates that were made yesterday showed no difference betweeen the supposed motile and no motile bacteria.New plates are made with agar concentration of 0.4%, 0.2% and 0.1% to see if the concentration of agar could be the problem.
Plates are to dry overnight.
Sebas
Did a colony PCR op deltaDES/CheY tet with primers HM07&HM10 (Fw tet with Rev downstream des) colony 2 had the rightinsert. Inoculated 3ml LB with colonie 2.
Did a miniprep on the other backbone with GFP and digested it with XbaI and PstI. Digested the hyperspank
backbone with XbaI and PstI and did a ligation O/N in a beaker with RT water in the fridge.
There where ~10 colonies on the negative control, ~30 on the 100µl plate and ~300 on the extra concentrated.
plate. Picked 3 colonies and grew them O/N