"
Team:Greensboro-Austin/Standard Proposal
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Survey Results) |
(→Introduction) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
| - | + | Previous Standards: | |
| - | + | As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering | |
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| + | Why the Idea of standards is good: | ||
| + | Drawbacks | ||
| + | We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here: | ||
==Survey Results== | ==Survey Results== | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 28 August 2013
Open Source Initiative
Introduction
Previous Standards:
As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering
Why the Idea of standards is good:
Drawbacks
We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:
Survey Results
Introduction
Previous Standards: As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering
Why the Idea of standards is good:
Drawbacks
We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:
Survey Results
