"
Team:Greensboro-Austin/Standard Proposal
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Introduction) |
(→Introduction) |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Drawbacks | Drawbacks | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [updated probability chart with GC content-inserted here] | ||
We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here: | We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here: | ||
Revision as of 20:54, 28 August 2013
Open Source Initiative
Introduction
Previous Standards:
As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering emerged, arguments for the standardizing the assembly methods involved in constructing plasmids also emerged.
Why the Idea of standards is good:
Drawbacks
[updated probability chart with GC content-inserted here]
We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:
Survey Results
Introduction
Previous Standards: As the fields of Synthetic Biology and genetic engineering emerged, arguments for the standardizing the assembly methods involved in constructing plasmids also emerged.
Why the Idea of standards is good:
Drawbacks
[updated probability chart with GC content-inserted here]
We speculated that other teams might be having the same issues with regards to part submission and illegal restriction sites. To find out we made a survey asking other teams if they ever come across the same sorts of problems as we do- an analysis of their responses has been shown here:
Survey Results
