Team:Groningen/Safety
From 2013.igem.org
Safety
Introduction
In 1983 the World Health Organization (WHO) published the first edition of the laboratory biosafety manual. This manual was composed for countries over the world to accept and implement the concepts of biological safety. This gave countries a scaffold to develop their national regulations in handeling pathogenic microorganisms.
The revised version of this manual in 2004, also addresses the current biosafety issues we are facing today, e.g. the use of genetic modified organisms (GMOs)[1]. Also a more recent development is the upcoming field of synthetic biology, which brings along more biosafety and ethical issues (discussed below).
In here, we will address the biological safety issues directly on our project with detailed information described by various organisations such as the WHO and the Commission on Genetic Modification (COGEM).
Infective microorganisms are classified, for laboratory work, by four risk groups. In this iGEM project we are working with Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. For E. coli it is known that it can cause irritation to skin, eyes, and respiratory tract, and could affect kidneys,
however this is a low individual and community risk[2]. B. subtilis is
unlikey to cause any harm to individual and community, and is also Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) [3].
In this case, the only relevant risk group for our project is Risk Group 1 (no or low individual and community risk). Microorganisms classified in this
group are unlikely to cause human or animal diseases are classified in this group. For Risk Group 1 a Basic Biosafety Level 1 (BSL1) laboratory is
required.
For our project we work on a BSL1 lab and all persons that do laboratory related work have a Good Microbiological Techniques (GMT) certificate. With this
certificate we are approved to work with Risk Group 2 organisms in a BSL2 laboratory according to the advice of the Royal Dutch Society of Microbiology.
GMT commitments: |
|
|
Synthetic Biology
The synthetic biology is an emerging discipline in biology with possible great potential, however it brings along new biosafety and ethical questions. Nowadays, the risk assessment framework is still applicable of the developments in synthetic biology, however, eventually when new developments in synthetic biology will arise the current risk assessments will not be adequate anymore (COGEN).The IRSC stated risks that arose from reports of various organisations:
- Insufficient basic knowledge about the potential risks posed by designed and synthetic organisms.
- Uncontrolled release of novel genetically modified organisms with potential environmental or human health implications, either arising from accidental release into the environment or from applications entailing deliberate release.
- Bio-terrorism, biological warfare and the construction of novel organisms designed to be hostile to human interests.
- The possible emergence of a ‘bio-hacker’ culture in which lone individuals develop dangerous organisms much as they currently create computer viruses.
- Patenting and the creation of monopolies, inhibiting basic research and restricting product development to large companies.
Many of those safety and ethical questions have been discussed in Schmidt, M. 2009.