Judging

From 2013.igem.org

Revision as of 21:29, 14 June 2013 by Kim (Talk | contribs)

Please note the medal criteria are still under review. You can use the existing criteria, but check back to make sure you meet all the requirements before the Jamborees!

The following is a list of Awards given by the iGEM Judges and some general information about how Award decisions are made. For examples of award-winning work, see the 2012 Jamboree Results.

REGIONAL JAMBOREES

I. iGEM Medals: All teams can earn medals. Teams must nominate themselves using the Judging Form, which will be available later.
The three levels of medals, from lowest to highest are Bronze, Silver, and Gold. Requirements for each medal are:

Bronze. The following 5 goals must be achieved:
  1. Team registration
  2. Complete Judging form
  3. Team Wiki
  4. Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
  5. Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines). A new application of and outstanding documentation (quantitative data showing the Part’s/ Device’s function) of a previously existing BioBrick part in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry also counts.
Silver: In addition to the Bronze Medal requirements, the following 3 goals must be achieved:
  1. Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected
  2. Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
  3. Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).
Gold: In addition to the Bronze and Silver Medal requirements, any one or more of the following:
  1. Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), create a new registry page for the improved part, and submit this part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).
    The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended.
  2. Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
  3. Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.
II. Software Track Medals: Special medals are awarded to teams in the Software Tools track. Teams must nominate themselves using the Judging Form.
See the Software page for details on Software Judging.

Retrieved from "http://2013.igem.org/Judging"