Team:Peking/Project/BioSensors

From 2013.igem.org

Revision as of 08:55, 25 September 2013 by Flora2013 (Talk | contribs)

Biosensor Introduction

One advantage of biosensors is that the detection profile of a particular biosensor is usually limited to a few specific signals, thus to make the output of biosensors highly informative. Another advantage is the responding procedure of a biosensor: it usually involves no more than transcription and translation, both of which are automatically operated by the living cells themselves; so it is more convenient to use, compared with conventional chemical methods that rely heavily on complicated measuring devices. Additionally, originating from functional elements of natural biological systems, biosensors are subject to various tuning methods such as directed evolution, point mutagenesis or other genetic manipulations.

A biosensor typically consists of a detector and a reporter; the input signal activates the detector, through which the reporter is stimulated to emit the output signal. In our project, the input signal for biosensor is aromatic compounds and the output is the expression of a reporter gene; the aromatics are supposed to be sensed by transcriptional regulators from the bacteria living in aromatics-rich environment.

Through the bioinformatic mining, we obtained 19 aromatics-sensing transcriptional regulators (see Sensor Mining). Noting the fact that their expected aromatics-sensing profiles overlap a lot, we finally determined 8 transcriptional regulators whose profiles could combine to cover the overall spectrum of aromatic compound species (Table 1).

Sensors Expected Aromatics-sensing Profiles Sources
XylS BzO; 2-MeBzO; 3-MeBzO; 2,3-MeBzO; 3,4-MeBzO Pseudomonas putida
XylR Toluene; m-Xylene; 3-ClTOL; 3-MePhl Pseudomonas putida
HbpR o-Phenylphenol; 2,6'-DiHydroxybiphenol Pseudomonas azelaica
HcaR PPA; 3-HPPA; 3,4-DHPPA Escherichia coli
HpaR 3-HPAA; 4-HPAA; 3,4-DHPAA Escherichia coli
PaaX PAASCoA Escherichia coli
DmpR Phl; 2-MePhl; 3-MePhl; 4-MePhl; 2-ClPhl Pseudomonas putida
NahR 4-MeSaA; 4-ClSaA; 5-ClSaA; SaA 3-IBzO Pseudomonas putida

Next we focused on constructing biosensors with low basal level, high induction ratio, and robust detection profiles. The coding sequences of these 8 transcriptional regulators were obtained by either chemical synthesis or PCR amplification. They were then incorporated into our biosensor circuit design (Fig. 1):

It can be expected that the primary construction of a biosensor circuit might not work. For the fine-tuning, a library of constitutive promoters and a library of RBS sequences, both of different strength, were exploited to genetically tailor the expression of transcriptional regulators and sfGFP, respectively (Fig. 2).

After sparing no efforts to fine-tune the circuits, we have successfully constructed a comprehensive collection of high-performance aromatics-sening biosensors, including XylS, XylR, HbpR, HcaR, DmpR. and NahR. Results showed that a large variety of aromatic compounds have been taken into our toolkit’s detection profiles (Fig. 3). See the detailed information about the performance of Individual Biosensors.

To allow the combination of these biosensors to analyze aromatics profiles of practical samples, the synergistic and antagonistic effects between inducers, in another word, the orthogonality, should be carefully assessed. The results showed that, within a general range of inducer concentration, the orthogonality of our biosensors are quite satisfactory to meet the requirements of aromatics profiling on practical samples (Fig. 4).

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the biosensor circuit
A constitutive promoter (Pc) constitutively expresses the transcriptional regulator protein on the low-copy backbone pSB4K5; the cognate promoter of the transcriptional regulator controls the expression of the reporter gene, super-fold green fluorescent protein (sfGFP, a novel and robust GFP variant designed for in vivo measurement of protein expression levels); its backbone is high-copy pUC57. Blue arrow, Pc promoter; red arrow, the promoter regulated by the aromatics-sensing transcriptional regulator; dark green ovals, Ribosome Binding Sites (RBS); red hexagons, transcriptional terminators; orange squares, gene coding sequences.

Figure 2. Libraries of promoters and RBS sequences used for the fine-tuning of biosensor circuits.
Pc promoter library was exploited to fine-tune the expression level of transcriptional regulator: J23106, J23105, J23114, J23117, J23109 and J23113. The RBS library is composed of B0031, B0032, and B0034 to tailor the expression level of reporter gene sfGFP. Blue arrow, Pc promoter; red arrow, the promoter regulated by the aromatics-sensing transcriptional regulator; dark green ovals, Ribosome Binding Sites (RBS); red hexagons, transcriptional terminators; orange squares, gene coding sequences.

Figure 3. The aromatics spectrum showing the individual aromatics-sensing profile of our biosensors.
Each color segment in the central ring represents the detection profile of a biosensor. Structural formula with color background stands for the aromatic compounds that can be detected by our biosensors.┝ stand for Adaptors, enzymes that convert undetectable compounds into detectable aromatics, thus to expand the detection capacity of some biosensors.

Figure 4. Summary of the orthogonality between the sensing-profiles of 4 representative biosensors.
The transcriptional regulator-specific inducer(s) of XylS, NahR, HbpR, and DmpR are all highly orthogonal to each other (e.g., although the sensing profiles of NahR and XylS overlap to some extent, in the orthogonality test we used NahR-specific and XylS-specific inducers and they proved to be really orthogonal), which is consistent with our expectation. Click Here to see the detailed information about the orthogonality tests.