Index.reference

From 2013.igem.org

1.Axelrod, Robert: The Evolution of Cooperation, 1985.
2.Axelrod, Robert: The Complexity of Cooperation - Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration, 1997.
3.Axelrod R Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma 1980(03)
4.Grim Patrick Spatialization and Greater Generosity in The Stochastic Prisoner's Dilemma . 1996(1-2) doi:10.1016/0303-2647(95)01541-8
5.Nowak M A;Sigmund K Oscillations in the Evolution of Reciprocity . 1989(11) doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80146-8
6.Maynard Smith J. Evolution and the Theory Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1982
7.Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press. 1989
8.Fudenberg D, Eric Maskin. Evolution and Cooperation in Noisy Repeated Games. American Economic Review. 1990, May, 80, pp. 274-279
9.Harsanyi John C, Rein Selten. A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge:MIT Press, 1998.

10.Selten R. Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games. International Journal of Game Theory, 1975, 4:25-55.

11.Crowley P H. Hawks, doves, and mixed-symmetry games. J. Theor. Biol. 2000, 204:543-563.

12.Enquist M, Leimar 0. Evolution of fighting behaviour: the effect of variation in resource value，J. theor. Biol. 1987, 127, 187-205.

13.Mesterton-Gibbons M, Dugatkin L A. Toward a theory of dominance hierarchies:effects of assessment, group size, and variation in fighting ability. Behav. Ecol. 1995, 6, 416-423.

14.Grafen A. The logic of divisively asymmetric contests:respect for ownership and desperado effect. Anim. Behav. 1987, 35, 462-467.

15.Dixit, Avinash K./ Skeath, Susan: Games of Strategy, 1999.

16. Axelrod R The complexity of cooperation:agent-based models of competition and collaboration,princeton 1997.

17. Boyd R;Lorberbaum J P No pure strategy is evolutionary stable in the repeated prisoner's dilemma . 1987 doi:10.1038/327058a0

18.Fogel D Evolving behaviours in the iterated prisoners dilemma 1993(01) doi:10.1162/evco.1993.1.1.77

19. Palomino F;Vega-edondo F Convergence of aspirations and(partial) cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma .1999(04) doi:10.1007/s001820050120

20.Janssen M A Evolution of cooperation in a one-shot prisoner' s dilemma based on recognition of trustworthy and untrustworthy agents . 2008 doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.02.004