Introduction

Motivation

細胞間の相互作用のシミュレーションは、細胞内の条件だけでなく位置関係などさらに複雑な条件を考慮しなければならないため、かなり複雑で手におえない そこで1細胞内でのシミュレーションにおいて、dryとwetの解離の対策を考えてみた。合成生物学のある研究（a fast robustなんとかかんとか）[citation*]では、オシレーションの形成をdryでもwetでも確認している。この実験系では、細胞分裂という、オシレーションの形成に強く影響を与えるであろう要素をゼロに近似できるようなロバストな回路がコンストラクトされている。このことから、dryでwetの系を考慮しきるのが難しいことの１つの解決法として、適切な近似計算によって複雑性を無視できるロバストネスを持った回路を構築することが考えられる。しかしそのような構成要素はそう多くなく、適応する系は限られている。そこで私たちは押しレーションの構築を他のアプローチによって実現し、dryに歩み寄るwetの系を考えてみた。私たちはrnaを構成要素とする押しレーションの構築をゴールとした。

Oscillation

その回路として、ncRNA-mRNAの相互作用を抑制機構に持ち、RNA アプタマーとtetR Proteinを促進機構に用いた以下の様な回路を提案する。アウトプット機構としては、Spinachを想定する。

This circuit oscillates in the following way: First, tet promoter is repressed by tetR at the downstream of constitutive promotor. Then, the oscillator is turned on by IPTG. IPTG activates Plac and tetRaptamer, Spinarch, and Antisense at the downstream of Ptet which are transcribed. Because tetRaptamer activates tet promotor, positive feedback occurs and more and more tetRaptamer, Spinarch, and Antisense are accumulated. Then, this circuit gets fluorescence. After Antisense is accumulated to some extent, tetRaptamer, at the downstream of Attenuator region, is repressed. Then, because new tetRaptamer is not created, the amount of tetRaptamer decreases quickly. So, tet promotor is repressed by tetR protein and the amount of Antisense and Spinarch falls, too. Then, this circuit loses fluorescence. After the amount of Antisense decreases sufficiently, this circuit recovers first condition. Through this cycle, this circuit acts as an oscillator.

促進、抑制の各機構と、この回路のアウトプットとしてのSpinachの機能は以下に述べる。

Repressor

We took up non-coding RNA (ncRNA) complementarily binding mRNA as an example of functional RNA which repress transcription. ncRNA in pT181 plasmid (pT181 attenuator) controls the fate of transcriptional elongation in response to an input by complementary antisense RNA. Attenuator region, which lies in 5' untranslated region of a transcript, folds into two different RNA structure. By an interaction with complementary antisense RNA, attenuator region forms Rho-independent terminator and the transcription of the downstream is stopped. Without antisense RNA, attenuator region RNA folds into an alternative structure which allow transcription of the downstream (Novick, 1989). The uniqueness of this mechanism is that it is constructed with only RNA without other small molecules. Synthetic biologists variant of it by means of nucleotide substitution etc. (Takahashi et al, 2013). In this paper, many variants ofpT181 attenuator/antisense is constructed and the attenuation rate of each variants is different. We chose this mechanism in gene repression.

Activator

We took up TetR aptamer as an example of functional RNA which activates a transcription. TetR aptamer induces tetracycline promoter (Ptet) by binding to tetracycline repressor (TetR), which represses Ptet. When TetR aptamer binds to TetR, induces conformational change of TetR. As a result, TetR cannot come to bind to tetracycline operator (tetO). We ordered MBL=IDT gene synthesis of pT181 attenuator region DNA, antisense DNA and TetR aptamer with prefix and suffix. We transferred these parts to pSB1C3 and constructed device for antisense and attenuator assay (Fig. ).

Reporter

我々は、RNAでできたレポーターとなりうる分子として、Spinachを挙げる。これはJeremy S. Paige, Karen Y. Wu, Samie R. Jaffrey, によって設計されたアプタマーの一種で、GFPを模倣している。SpinachはGFPの蛍光部位によく似た合成物であるDMHBIに特異的に結合するアプタマーから設計された。GFPのfluorophoreはdenatured GFPでは蛍光を示すことがなく、分子の奥に折りたたまれて初めて蛍光を発するようになる。DMHBIもこれと似た性質を持っており、単体ではほぼ蛍光を示すことはなく、GFPの構造の持つ機能を真似たSpinachの高次構造の奥に取り込まれて初めて蛍光するようになる。そのため、サンプルにDMHBIを加えた後に蛍光を確認すると、サンプル内にSpinachが存在するかどうかがわかる。もし存在すればSpinachはDMHBIと結合して蛍光を発するだろうし、存在しなければ蛍光は発しえない。Spinachを用いることで、RNAを直接イメージングできる他、安定なタンパク質では確認できない、大きく変化するRNAの発現量を正確に反映することが出来る。

Spinach is an example of a reporter molecular， which is a kind of aptamer designed by Jeremy S. Paige, Karen Y. Wu and Samie R. Jaffrey imitating GFP. It is designed from aptamer combining with the complex--DMHBI which is considerably similar to the fluorescence site of GFP. The fluorescence of GFP show as long as the molecular is folded in the back of the molecule, instead in denatured GFP. DMHBI also shows almost the same property--the simple substance produces little fluorescence， compared with when captured by higher-order constructions. That is to say, if fluorescence is conformed after DMHBI is added, it is manifest that Spinach exists. If Spinach exists, it combines with DMHBI to produce fluorescence, vice versa. Hence, by using Spinach, it’s possible not only to image RNA directly, but also accurately reflect the expression level which vary intensely, which can’t be confirmed via stable protein.

We suggest Spinach as a molecule which can be a reporter made of RNA. It is an aptamer designed by Jeremy S. Paige, Karen Y. Wu, Samie R. Jaffrey and imitates GFP. Spinach was designed from the aptamer which binds specifically to DMHBI, which is similar to fluorophore of GFP.

Fusion

これらを使って遺伝子回路を組み立てるとき、複数のmoduleを同じ機能要素に組みこまなければならないときも十分あり得る。例えば転写抑制の様子をレポートするとき、異なる因子で促進と抑制を行うような系を作るときである。このとき、複数のモジュールを連結したことによる相互作用や立体構造の問題により機能が阻害される可能性がある。タンパク質ではその問題を予測するのは難しいが、RNAであれば配列情報から比較的簡単に二次構造を予測することができ、これらの問題を回避出来る。われわれは、機能を確認したtetR aptamer, Antisense-Attenuator RNA, をそれぞれつなぎあわせ、二次構造を予測し、実際に働いていることを確認した。tetRタンパク質存在下でtetR aptamerとAttenuator antisense RNAを組み合わせたRNAがPtetプロモーター下流のGFPの転写量を増加させるかを確認した。 並びにAttenuator antisense RNAとSpinarchを連結したRNAを発現させ、Attenuator Region下流のGFP遺伝子の発現量が減少していることとSpinarchがDFHBI存在下で蛍光するかどうかを確認した。 Intending to check the process of transcriptional repression system and the system which promotes and represses processes of transcription by using different factors, we have to join some modules into a single RNA strand. When we combine plural modules, the function of the modules may be inhibited by interactions and steric structures between each other. in the case of RNA,it is easier to predict and avoid the steric problems than that of proteins because we can predict the secondary structure of RNA from its primary structure. We combined tetR aptamer and Antisense-Attenuator RNA, whose functions are confirmed, and predicted secondary structures, as a result it actually worked. We also observed tetR aptamer-Attenuator antisense fusion RNA increased expression level of downstream GFP of tet promoter in the presence of tetR proteins.

-----const-------

experimental group
a. Pcon-atte-tetRaptamer-DT Ptet-GFP-DT Pcon-tetR-DT
positive control
b. Pcon-tetRaptamer-DT Ptet-GFP-DT Pcon-tetR-DT
-Fusionする前とのtetRaptamerの働きの比較
negative control
c. Ptet-GFP-DT Pcon-tetR-DT

Positive Control
A. Pcon-tetRaptamer Ptet-GFP Pcon-tetR

Through this E.coli, we can confirm that separated tetRaptamer restricts the function of tetR protein.

Negative Control
B. Ptet-GFP Pcon-tetR

This E.coli shows that tetR protein represses the expression of genes at the downstream of tet promotor.

Experimental Group
C. Pcon-atte-tetRaptamer Ptet-GFP Pcon-tetR

------const-------

We used centroid fold (URL) and mfold (URL) to predict the secondary structure of RNA(a). As the picture shown below, the structure of tetR aptamer is not affected by attenuator stem loop. This suggests that the efficiency of tetR aptamer is not affected by the existence of attenuator stem loop.

Centroid fold, mfoldのfig-tetR aptamer only----tetR aptamer-antisense

tetRが常時発現されている状態では、AttenuatorとtetRaptamerを連結したRNAを転写する大腸菌(figC)のGFP発現量は、tetRaptamerを転写しない大腸菌(figB)よりも多く、ほかのRNAと連結していないtetRaptamerを転写する大腸菌(figA)と比較して{ほぼ同等 or 小さい}であることから、AttenuatorとtetRaptamerを連結すると、tetRaptamerは{全く干渉せずに機能する or 効果は下がるが機能する}ことがわかる。

If tetR is expressed, E.coli in which the united RNA(figC) was introduced expresses more GFP than E.coli which didn’t have the tetRaptamer sequence(figB). By comparing E.coli expressing independent tetRaptamer(figA) and E.coli expressing the united RNA(figC), it is convinced that tetRaptamer next door to Attenuator { works as well as independent one / works more weakly than a independent one. However, it certainly works.}

Experiment

(・Construction) ・転写確認 ・構造予測

Future work

To solve simultaneous differential equations meaning oscilation model numerically, we will try to found exact values of some constants. For example, to determine binding constant between tetR and tetR aptamer, we will try to build up assay method and to get quantitative data.
After that, we will substitute the values for oscilation model and try to solve simulate. And we will continue assaying of our parts.
Then, after finishing construction of gene circuits that makes oscilation, we assay the oscilation circuit in wet lab.
Finaly, we compair results of wet lab and dry lab and discuss a point in common/difference between the results.

Parts List

<groupparts>iGEM013 Kyoto</groupparts>

Reference

[1][http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v456/n7221/abs/nature07389.html Jesse Stricker et al.(2008)"A fast, robust and tunable synthetic gene oscillator" Nature 456, 516-519]
[2][http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23761434 Melissa K. Takahashi and Julius B. Lucks.(2013)"A modular strategy for engineering orthogonal chimeric RNA transcription regulators"Nucleic Acids Research 41(15),7577-88]
[3][http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19246008 Anke Hunsicker et al.(2009)"An RNA aptamer that induces transcription"Chem Biol,16(2),173-180]
[4][http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6042/642.abstract Jeremy S. Paige et al.(2011)"RNA Mimics of Green Fluorescent Protein"Science Vol. 333 no. 6042 pp. 642-646]

[http://www.ncrna.org/ Functional RNA Project provided by Computational Biology Research Center (CBRC)]