"
The aim of our project is to control the density of a living bacterial population with light-transmitted signals:
$\bullet$From cells to computer : fluorescence and backscattered light as measurable signals from the cell suspension.
$\bullet$From the computer to the cells : white illumination to kill cells expressing KillerRed proteins. Its intensity needs to be adjusted.
The density of living cells cannot be measured instantaneously: it is determined by plating the cells on LB-agar plates and counting the colonies.
In order to validate our system, we first tried to have a constant population of living bacteria. This situation is characterized by an $OD_{600}$ growing up in a linear way (see below). Our model was necessary to find the best time profile of the illumination $I(t)$ to reach as quickly as possible a stable level of the amount of living bacteria
In ourinitial model we showed that it was theoretically possible to stabilize the amount of living bacteria with a constant light intensity. With the complete model, this still holds true, as shown by the following simulations. In addition, numerical simulation shows that the light intensity is a very sensitive parameter. Below are displayed three simulated 16 hours long kinetics, for a cell suspension illuminated at a power of $1UL$ for the first (red), $0.327UL$ for the second (blue) and $0.25UL$ for the last one (green).
Here the predictions of the amount of living cells (in $OD_{600}$). If the light intensity is too strong, all the bacteria die, if it is too weak, they grow. And there is a value of light intensity in the middle that permits to get a constant value of living cells.
Here is the prediction of the global $OD_{600}$, with both living and dead bacteria. When the light intensity is too strong, the $OD_{600}$ turns constant, when light is too weak, it growths exponentially. But on the right value of light, it growths in a linear way.
A Model Predictive Control is a Process Control able to deal with complex systems like ours. As our system cannot be stabilized with a simple closed-loop control, it is therefore required to a control more advanced like this one. The aim is to drive our system to a setpoint by predicting the evolution of the system, and adapting the answer to these predictions. To do so, the control will use different kinds of variables:
$\bullet$ Some variables defines the setpoint, here, we want to drive our living bacteria concentration to a determinate value, called $C_{target}.
$\bullet$ Some variables are measurable durong the experiment. Here, the fluorescence. They are the only ones that will enable us to see if the system behaves according to plans.
$\bullet$ Other cannont be measured and have to be estimated with the model. Precisely, the living bacteria concentration cannot be measured. This is a reason why the model has to be precise : we will not be able to measure our setpoint, it shall be estimated.
$\bullet$ And variables are the ones used to act on the system. The light intensity will affect the system by decreasing the amount of living bacteria and the concentration of KillerRed.
This is how it works:
$1$. For the first point, we have all the datas : the fluorescence $I(0)$and the amount of living cells $C(0)$(no bacteria has died, so $C(0)=OD_{600}$).
$2$. A illumination $I_1(t)$ is created, it is supposed, according to the model, drive $C(t)$ to its setpoint $C_{target}$. The fluorescence $F_1(t)$ and the amount of cells $C_1(t)$ are also estimated.
$3$. For a determinate time $\tau$, around 10 minutes to have a start of effect, the experiment will be run with the illumination $I_1(t)$
$4$. At time $t=\tau$, the real fluorescence, $F(\tau)$, is measured and compared to the estimated one, $F_1(\tau)$.
$5$. The others parameters like $C(\tau)$ are estimated according to the difference between $F(\tau)$ and $F_1(\tau)$. If $F(\tau)< F_1(\tau)$, it means that we had overestimated the growth of cells, and so now : $C_{real}(\tau)< C_1(\tau)$.
$6$. From these estimated and measured values, it goes back to $2$ and $I_2(t)$, $F_2(t)$ and $C_2(t)$ are created.
It will not drive perfectly $C(t)$ to its setpoint $C_{target}$, the imperfections of the model will create a gap between them. But we have shown the gap is not too big compared to the value of $C_{target}$.
When the model's parameters were calculated, it appeared that some of them ($b$, $k$ and $l$) were very variable, their value depended a lot on the preparation of the experiment. Sadly, it is important that they are the more accurate possible, the quality of the predictions depend greatly on them. That is the reason why those 3 parameters shall be slightly modified for each experiment.
$1$ A first period of approximately 100 minutes without illumination to let the bacteria grow and produce KillerRed.
$2$ A second one with an illumination at maximal intensity. As the effects of light appear, it becomes possible to improve the fit of the volatile parameters ($b$, $k$ and $l$). The length of this period depends on the precision wanted for the parameters: the more it lasts, the more the effects of ligth are obvious, and the more the improvement of the fit is efficient.
These two first steps are also essential, according to the model, to accelerate the apparition of the level of the amount of living bacteria. If the light of stabilization is switched on from the beginning, the level will appear after 8 hours. But if bacteria are exposed to an important intensity, they will stabilized quicker.
$3$ Once the parameters are chosen, the model is used to determinate the light intensity that will stabilised our system.
$4$ The third step passed, the model and its parameters are fixed. But the light intensity still can be modified to control the system if its measured values are drifting away from the trajectory calculated.
It is not already the model predictive control, it is the first way to stabilize safely and quickly the population of living bacteria. This experimement is the one used as a proof of concept.
